This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/17/world/middleeast/iran-nuclear-talks.html
The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 1 | Version 2 |
|---|---|
| Nuclear Talks With Iran Fail To Yield Pact, Officials Say | Nuclear Talks With Iran Fail To Yield Pact, Officials Say |
| (35 minutes later) | |
| LONDON — The latest round of nuclear talks between Iran and six world powers ended on Friday in Vienna, with Iranian and American officials saying that progress was slow and difficult, with serious gaps between the two sides on basic issues like the size of any nuclear enrichment capability Iran would be permitted to retain. | LONDON — The latest round of nuclear talks between Iran and six world powers ended on Friday in Vienna, with Iranian and American officials saying that progress was slow and difficult, with serious gaps between the two sides on basic issues like the size of any nuclear enrichment capability Iran would be permitted to retain. |
| A senior American official, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss diplomatic negotiations, said that Iran needed to be more realistic in the talks. Iran’s deputy foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, told Iranian news media that “there was no tangible progress in this round of the talks” and that differences were too large to begin drafting an accord. But he said that the talks would continue next month. | A senior American official, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss diplomatic negotiations, said that Iran needed to be more realistic in the talks. Iran’s deputy foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, told Iranian news media that “there was no tangible progress in this round of the talks” and that differences were too large to begin drafting an accord. But he said that the talks would continue next month. |
| The American official agreed with Mr. Araghchi that “significant gaps” remained after three days of talks. “Iran still has to make some hard choices,” the official said. “We are concerned that progress is not being made and that time is short.” | |
| A senior European diplomat said that “we had expected a little more flexibility on their side.” Iranian officials, for their part, told the IRNA news agency that “the West has to abandon its excessive demands,” and that “we had expected the Western side to become more realistic, but this doesn’t appear to be the case yet.” | |
| The two sides had set a July 20 deadline to resolve their differences, although a temporary agreement late last year incorporated the possibility of another six-month extension, which seems likely. The five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council, plus Germany, want a deal that would ensure that Iran’s enrichment capability was so constrained that it could not “break out” quickly to produce enough fissile material for a bomb, whether made from uranium or plutonium. They want intensive inspections and tough restrictions on enrichment to ensure that Iran cannot secretly build a nuclear bomb. | The two sides had set a July 20 deadline to resolve their differences, although a temporary agreement late last year incorporated the possibility of another six-month extension, which seems likely. The five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council, plus Germany, want a deal that would ensure that Iran’s enrichment capability was so constrained that it could not “break out” quickly to produce enough fissile material for a bomb, whether made from uranium or plutonium. They want intensive inspections and tough restrictions on enrichment to ensure that Iran cannot secretly build a nuclear bomb. |
| Iran, which has regularly denied that it desires a nuclear weapon, wants economic sanctions against it lifted and recognition that it can continue to enrich uranium for what it asserts are peaceful uses: medicine and electricity. But the six powers want severe restrictions on the number and type of centrifuges Iran can possess — an issue that one American official characterized before this round of talks as “the sticker-shock conversation.” | Iran, which has regularly denied that it desires a nuclear weapon, wants economic sanctions against it lifted and recognition that it can continue to enrich uranium for what it asserts are peaceful uses: medicine and electricity. But the six powers want severe restrictions on the number and type of centrifuges Iran can possess — an issue that one American official characterized before this round of talks as “the sticker-shock conversation.” |
| Mr. Araghchi said that the two sides would have “one or two more rounds of talks in June,” but no date for another round was set in Vienna. | |
| Negotiators have characterized the talks, which have included separate discussions among technical experts, as cordial and workmanlike, with little rhetorical speechmaking. They are carried out in English, so there is no time wasted on translation. But the cordiality of the discussions has not made an agreement that restores the Security Council’s trust in Iran’s peaceful intentions and Iran’s trust in Western aims any easier. | |
| Both sides say they want to reach a deal, so negotiations are expected to intensify as the July deadline approaches. Senior Western diplomats familiar with the talks, speaking anonymously in accordance with diplomatic practice, have said that they are skeptical of success by the deadline, but that neither side wants a breakdown in negotiations — Iran because it is being hit hard by the sanctions, and the six powers because a failure of the talks might lead to a military strike on Iran by Israel or the United States, which have vowed never to allow Iran to obtain a nuclear weapon. | |
| Iranian officials have spoken of their desire to expand their enrichment capacity to 50,000 centrifuges of the most modern type, compared with the 19,000 currently installed, some of them outmoded, of which 10,000 are operating. | Iranian officials have spoken of their desire to expand their enrichment capacity to 50,000 centrifuges of the most modern type, compared with the 19,000 currently installed, some of them outmoded, of which 10,000 are operating. |
| Washington has said that an enrichment capacity “greater than a few thousand first-generation centrifuges would give Iran an unacceptably rapid breakout capability,” according to Robert Einhorn, a former United States negotiator, writing in The National Interest last week. Iran’s desire for 50,000 modern centrifuges, he wrote, “is a showstopper, and Iran must know that.” Breakout capability means the ability to quickly and quietly produce a bomb. | Washington has said that an enrichment capacity “greater than a few thousand first-generation centrifuges would give Iran an unacceptably rapid breakout capability,” according to Robert Einhorn, a former United States negotiator, writing in The National Interest last week. Iran’s desire for 50,000 modern centrifuges, he wrote, “is a showstopper, and Iran must know that.” Breakout capability means the ability to quickly and quietly produce a bomb. |
| These talks began in February after a deal late last year that suspended some sanctions and freed some assets in return for Tehran’s agreement to sharply reduce its stockpile of more highly enriched uranium that could be more quickly turned into a weapon. That deal was meant to create space for these talks to produce a final agreement. | These talks began in February after a deal late last year that suspended some sanctions and freed some assets in return for Tehran’s agreement to sharply reduce its stockpile of more highly enriched uranium that could be more quickly turned into a weapon. That deal was meant to create space for these talks to produce a final agreement. |