This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-27420100
The article has changed 12 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 1 | Version 2 |
---|---|
Journal's statin articles to be investigated | Journal's statin articles to be investigated |
(about 4 hours later) | |
Articles published by the British Medical Journal suggesting that statins may be harmful are to be investigated. | Articles published by the British Medical Journal suggesting that statins may be harmful are to be investigated. |
The journal will set up an expert panel to decide if it should retract two articles saying the cholesterol-reducing drugs had harmful side-effects. | The journal will set up an expert panel to decide if it should retract two articles saying the cholesterol-reducing drugs had harmful side-effects. |
The papers were criticised when they were published in October. | The papers were criticised when they were published in October. |
Statins are offered to seven million people in the UK who have a 20% chance of heart disease in the next decade. | Statins are offered to seven million people in the UK who have a 20% chance of heart disease in the next decade. |
The BMJ said Dr John Abramson from Harvard Medical School and UK cardiologist Dr Aseem Malhotra had already withdrawn statements from the articles after some figures proved to be incorrect. | The BMJ said Dr John Abramson from Harvard Medical School and UK cardiologist Dr Aseem Malhotra had already withdrawn statements from the articles after some figures proved to be incorrect. |
Its expert panel will decide whether to completely retract the articles. | Its expert panel will decide whether to completely retract the articles. |
Errors were not picked up at the time by the journal's editors or the experts who peer-reviewed the work, the BMJ said. | Errors were not picked up at the time by the journal's editors or the experts who peer-reviewed the work, the BMJ said. |
The journal said Dr Abramson's paper cited data from an "uncontrolled observational study" and "incorrectly concluded" that statin side-effects occur in 18-20% of patients. | The journal said Dr Abramson's paper cited data from an "uncontrolled observational study" and "incorrectly concluded" that statin side-effects occur in 18-20% of patients. |
The same mistake was made by Dr Malhotra in the same edition of the BMJ and it is these statements that have been withdrawn, the journal said. | The same mistake was made by Dr Malhotra in the same edition of the BMJ and it is these statements that have been withdrawn, the journal said. |
BMJ editor Dr Fiona Godlee added: "The BMJ and the authors of both these articles have now been made aware that this figure is incorrect, and corrections have been published withdrawing these statements." | BMJ editor Dr Fiona Godlee added: "The BMJ and the authors of both these articles have now been made aware that this figure is incorrect, and corrections have been published withdrawing these statements." |
'Exaggerated concern' | 'Exaggerated concern' |
Dr Godlee said she did not want patients who could benefit from statins to be "wrongly deterred from starting or continuing treatment because of exaggerated concern over side-effects". | Dr Godlee said she did not want patients who could benefit from statins to be "wrongly deterred from starting or continuing treatment because of exaggerated concern over side-effects". |
She said she had established the panel because as editor she had an interest in not immediately retracting the work unless the case against them was clear. | She said she had established the panel because as editor she had an interest in not immediately retracting the work unless the case against them was clear. |
The BMJ would continue to debate "whether the use of statins should be extended to a vastly wider population of people at low risk of cardiovascular disease; and the role of saturated fat in heart disease," she added. | The BMJ would continue to debate "whether the use of statins should be extended to a vastly wider population of people at low risk of cardiovascular disease; and the role of saturated fat in heart disease," she added. |
The independent panel will be chaired by Dr Iona Heath, a former chairwoman of the Royal College of General Practitioners and a member of the BMJ's ethics committee. | The independent panel will be chaired by Dr Iona Heath, a former chairwoman of the Royal College of General Practitioners and a member of the BMJ's ethics committee. |
Have you been prescribed statins? Did you choose to stop taking them due to the research? If you are willing to be interviewed, please email haveyoursay@bbc.co.uk with your experiences using the subject line 'statins'. Please include your contact details, and if you are happy to feature on the BBC News website, a photograph of yourself. |