This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/may/14/new-york-times-jill-abramson-forced-out

The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Jill Abramson forced out as New York Times executive editor Jill Abramson forced out as New York Times executive editor
(about 2 hours later)
The executive editor of the New York Times, Jill Abramson, has been forced out by the newspaper's publisher, in an unexpected reshuffle at the top of the venerable publication. The most august newspaper in the US, the New York Times, was left reeling on Wednesday after its executive editor, Jill Abramson, was fired and replaced by her deputy less than three years into one of the most exalted jobs in journalism.
In a move that caught even the most senior staff at the paper unawares, Arthur Sulzberger Jr, the publisher and chairman of the New York Times Company, announced that Abramson would be replaced immediately by Dean Baquet, the paper's managing editor. He is the first African American to hold the job. In a move that caught even the most senior staff at the paper unawares, Arthur Sulzberger Jr, the publisher and chairman of the New York Times Company, announced that Abramson would be replaced immediately by Dean Baquet, the paper's managing editor. He is the first African American to hold the job, although that milestone is likely to be overshadowed by the sudden dismissal of the paper's first female top editor in its 162-year history.
“I’ve loved my run at the Times,” Abramson said in a statement published by the Times. “I got to work with the best journalists in the world doing so much stand-up journalism.” When she took the job in September 2011, Abramson, 60, said it was “meaningful” that a woman had been appointed to run newsroom of such an influential organisation, and her removal is now certain to be perceived as an example of the “glass cliff” facing women in high journalistic office.
Abramson, 60, was appointed to the top job in September 2011 and was the first woman to hold the position. In a brief statement released by the New York Times, Abramson pointedly commented that under her watch “our masthead became half female for the first time and so many great women hold important newsroom positions”.
Abramson’s exit was unexpected and almost brutally abrupt. She left without addressing the newsroom, was taken off the paper’s masthead within a few minutes of staff being informed of the change, and reports suggested she will no longer work for the newspaper.
Her stint in the top editorial post lasted only slightly longer than that of Howell Raines, whose own departure in 2003 Abramson paradoxically hastened in the wake of the Jayson Blair plagiarism and fabrication scandal.
Sulzberger addressed the newsroom just after 2.30pm on Wednesday. According to multiple sources, he told staff that he had elevated Baquet to the top job in an effort to improve management. “I choose to appoint a new leader for our newsroom because I believe that new leadership will improve some aspects of the management of the newsroom,” he said in an account published by CNN's senior media correspondent Brian Stelter, a former media reporter at the Times .Sulzberger addressed the newsroom just after 2.30pm on Wednesday. According to multiple sources, he told staff that he had elevated Baquet to the top job in an effort to improve management. “I choose to appoint a new leader for our newsroom because I believe that new leadership will improve some aspects of the management of the newsroom,” he said in an account published by CNN's senior media correspondent Brian Stelter, a former media reporter at the Times .
Baquet also addressed the meeting, and toured the newsroom afterwards. Abramson was absent, and within a few minutes of the end of meeting, the publication had removed her name from the masthead on the website. Though did not elaborate on the reasons for replacing Abramson, a Politico article published in April 2013 described Abramson as “on the verge of losing the support of the newsroom”. It reported tensions with Baquet and Mark Thompson, the former director-general of the BBC who is now CEO of the New York Times Company. It detailed a disagreement with Baquet in which she criticised his news judgment as “boring” and he replied by storming out of her office and slamming his hand against a wall.
Although Sulzberger did not elaborate on the reasons for replacing Abramson, a Politico article published in April 2013 described Abramson as “on the verge of losing the support of the newsroom,” a year and a half into her tenure as executive editor. A month later, Abramson criticized the Politico piece as “ad feminem” attack. Citing the story’s reliance on anonymous sources, Abramson called it “shoddy.”
In a statement to investors, Sulzberger added: “There is no journalist in our newsroom or elsewhere better qualified to take on the responsibilities of executive editor at this time than Dean Baquet. He is an exceptional reporter and editor with impeccable news judgment who enjoys the confidence and support of his colleagues around the world and across the organization.”
Baquet said in the statement: “It is an honor to be asked to lead the only newsroom in the country that is actually better than it was a generation ago, one that approaches the world with wonder and ambition every day. The talented journalists of The New York Times make it the greatest news operation in history and I look forward to working with them to deliver the world’s most engaging and enterprising journalism.
In a note to staff, published by the Huffington Post, Sulzberger said Baquet was a “proven manager" who was a "fierce advocate" for his repoters. It added: "And importantly, he is an enthusiastic supporter of our push toward further creativity in how we approach the digital expression of our journalism."
Abramson responded to the Politico piece in October 2013 during a keynote address at the Journalism and Women Symposium in Essex, Vt. Abramson called the piece an, “ad feminem” attack. Citing the story’s reliance on anonymous sources, Abramson called it “shoddy.”
The story described an April 2013 “altercation” between Abramson and Baquet. Abramson reportedly called Baquet into her office to “complain” about coverage. The discussion ended with Baquet storming out of Abramson’s office and slamming his hand against a wall. Baquet then missed the Times’ 4pm. editors’ meeting.
“This story seemed to revolve around this silly fight that Dean Baquet the managing editor of the Times and I had had one day, but like who doesn't occasionally have you know, spats with co-workers, and you know this one blew over in less than a day as most do,” Abramson said.“This story seemed to revolve around this silly fight that Dean Baquet the managing editor of the Times and I had had one day, but like who doesn't occasionally have you know, spats with co-workers, and you know this one blew over in less than a day as most do,” Abramson said.
Reports also suggested that relations between Abramson and Thompson were strained. Thompson raised eyebrows by extending his remit into areas traditionally considered the preserve of the executive editor notably hiring a head of video production under his budget.
A New York magazine article also provoked comment when it reported that Thompson told a colleague that he could do any job at the newspaper: “I could be editor of the New York Times,” he was purported to have said.
In his statement announcing the convulsive changes, Sulzberger emphasised that the paper’s search for a digital future was a top priority. He said the new leadership had been brought in “at a time when the newsroom is about to embark on a significant effort to transition more fully to a digital-first reality”, adding that Baquet was “an enthusiastic supporter of our push toward further creativity in how we approach the digital expression of our journalism”.
A sense that the newspaper was not moving quickly enough to embrace digital reform was given in an internal “innovation report” led by Sulzberger’s son, Arthur Gregg Sulzberger, and revealed last week. The report claimed that “no traditional news organization has been more successful in the transition to digital than The New York Times” but it also concluded that “the pace of change in our industry demands that we move faster”.
Poignantly, given her departure, Abramson circulated the report with a memo to the newsroom saying that “the masthead needs to make further structural changes in the newsroom to achieve a digital first reality”. Her note was co-signed by Baquet.
Abramson has long had a reputation for abrasiveness in her dealings with colleagues. She also earned herself enemies by leveraging the departure of about 30 editors and writers including well-respected senior journalists such as Jonathan Landman now at Bloomberg View, and Jim Roberts now at Mashable.
But she also had strong supporters, and could point to a stream of journalistic successes including eight Pulitzer awards in her three years in office. The paper had notable successes including its investigation into corruption in China and the way big tech companies such as Apple conduct themselves around the world, as well as some significant reporting on the National Security Agency after the Guardian shared some of Edward Snowden’s leaked documents with the newspaper.
Nate Silver, who left the Times last July and took his FiveThirtyEight blog to ESPN, said in a tweet : “I'll always be a huge @JillAbramson fan. She did a hell of a lot more good for the New York Times than the upper management there.”
When the dust settles, attention will swing to Baquet, 57, and to the many challenges he faces in leading the newsroom. A former editor of the Los Angeles Times, he has worked for the New York Times since 2007 following an earlier stint on the paper in the 1990s.
Given one of the criticisms that have been aired against Abramson – that she was at times a little distant from the newsroom – it was notable that Baquet stressed in his first speech as executive editor that he would be a regular presence on the newsroom floor.
In a statement, he said: “It is an honor to be asked to lead the only newsroom in the country that is actually better than it was a generation ago, one that approaches the world with wonder and ambition every day. The talented journalists of The New York Times make it the greatest news operation in history and I look forward to working with them to deliver the world’s most engaging and enterprising journalism.”