This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/may/14/theresa-may-investigate-police-request-blogger-tweets

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Theresa May urged to investigate police request for blogger to remove tweets Theresa May urged to investigate police request for blogger to remove tweets
(about 2 hours later)
Jenny Jones, the Green party's sole peer, has asked Theresa May, the home secretary, to investigate Cambridgeshire police after two of its officers visited a blogger who tweeted "fact checks" about Ukip policies.Jenny Jones, the Green party's sole peer, has asked Theresa May, the home secretary, to investigate Cambridgeshire police after two of its officers visited a blogger who tweeted "fact checks" about Ukip policies.
In a letter to May, Jones said the incident raised interesting questions of how to deal with relatively new crimes committed on social media and how police react to them.In a letter to May, Jones said the incident raised interesting questions of how to deal with relatively new crimes committed on social media and how police react to them.
"In this case, the police themselves have admitted that nothing illegal took place, yet they visited the blogger anyway," writes Jones. "For me, this suggests a recklessness in the face of competing police resources, time and energy, not to mention a potential infringement of the blogger's civil liberties.""In this case, the police themselves have admitted that nothing illegal took place, yet they visited the blogger anyway," writes Jones. "For me, this suggests a recklessness in the face of competing police resources, time and energy, not to mention a potential infringement of the blogger's civil liberties."
She urged May to start "a short investigation into the procedures of Cambridgeshire police, that allowed two officers to visit someone after a complaint that did not contain a justifiable reason for the visit".She urged May to start "a short investigation into the procedures of Cambridgeshire police, that allowed two officers to visit someone after a complaint that did not contain a justifiable reason for the visit".
Second, Jones said Home Office advice should be written and circulated as quickly as possible to all forces, outlining what is and what is not illegal on social media.Second, Jones said Home Office advice should be written and circulated as quickly as possible to all forces, outlining what is and what is not illegal on social media.
The chief constable of Cambridgeshire police, Simon Parr, has already admitted that the force should not have become involved, The chief constable of Cambridgeshire police, Simon Parr, has already admitted that the force should not have become involved, and has asked for an internal review into the incident. "I believe in this instance police attendance was not required and I have asked for our approach to this sort of incident to be reviewed to ensure we do not get involved unless there is clear evidence that an offence may have been committed," said Parr.
and has asked for an internal review into the incident. "I believe in this instance police attendance was not required and I have asked for our approach to this sort of incident to be reviewed to ensure we do not get involved unless there is clear evidence that an offence may have been committed," said Parr.
Parr's comments followed a visit last weekend by two police officers to Michael Abberton, a Green party member. He said he was asked to delete some of his tweets, in particular a retweet of a faked poster giving 10 reasons to vote for Ukip, including scrapping paid maternity leave and raising income tax for the poorest 88% of Britons.Parr's comments followed a visit last weekend by two police officers to Michael Abberton, a Green party member. He said he was asked to delete some of his tweets, in particular a retweet of a faked poster giving 10 reasons to vote for Ukip, including scrapping paid maternity leave and raising income tax for the poorest 88% of Britons.
The police visit was prompted by a complaint from a Ukip councillor who was unhappy about the tweets. Police said they made inquiries "as to whether any offences had been committed under the Representation of the People Act but none were revealed and no further action was taken".The police visit was prompted by a complaint from a Ukip councillor who was unhappy about the tweets. Police said they made inquiries "as to whether any offences had been committed under the Representation of the People Act but none were revealed and no further action was taken".
Ukip complained that Abberton was impersonating and misrepresenting the party.Ukip complained that Abberton was impersonating and misrepresenting the party.
Cambridgeshire police confirmed the visit but said they had not told Abberton to delete tweets. Cambridgeshire police accept that Abberton may have been asked to delete the tweets passing on requests from Ukip but that he was not forced to.
Abberton, who writes a blog called Axe of Reason, said the two officers were professional and polite, but he did question why they had visited him.Abberton, who writes a blog called Axe of Reason, said the two officers were professional and polite, but he did question why they had visited him.
He wrote: "It wasn't until after they left that I questioned why they had visited me in the first place. A complaint had been made but with no legal basis. Not a police matter. So why did they come to my home in the middle of a Saturday afternoon? … Why would a political party, so close to an election, seek to stop people finding out what their policies are or their past voting record? And is it not a matter for concern that a political party would seek to silence dissent and debate in such a manner?"He wrote: "It wasn't until after they left that I questioned why they had visited me in the first place. A complaint had been made but with no legal basis. Not a police matter. So why did they come to my home in the middle of a Saturday afternoon? … Why would a political party, so close to an election, seek to stop people finding out what their policies are or their past voting record? And is it not a matter for concern that a political party would seek to silence dissent and debate in such a manner?"
Civil liberties groups have expressed surprise at the involvement of the police in the matter.Civil liberties groups have expressed surprise at the involvement of the police in the matter.
Shami Chakrabarti, the director of Liberty, said: "With all sorts of important ballots pending, the police should learn from this significant gaffe. They should be very slow to become embroiled in political spats and even slower to silence speech without legal authority and clear evidence of serious crime."Shami Chakrabarti, the director of Liberty, said: "With all sorts of important ballots pending, the police should learn from this significant gaffe. They should be very slow to become embroiled in political spats and even slower to silence speech without legal authority and clear evidence of serious crime."