This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/may/13/heathrow-third-runway-revised-plan-for-airport-expansion-to-be-unveiled
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
Heathrow third runway: revised plan for airport expansion to be unveiled | Heathrow third runway: revised plan for airport expansion to be unveiled |
(about 2 hours later) | |
Heathrow's bosses are laying out revised plans for | |
expansion that they will submit to the Whitehall-appointed Airports | |
Commission. | |
The proposals could lead to those dropping | |
off passengers at Heathrow by car being subject to a congestion charge | |
once transport improvements around the airport are finished. | |
Heathrow's | |
revised submission also includes an improved compensation plan for | |
those affected by the building of a third runway at Heathrow, should | |
such an expansion get the go-ahead from the commission. | |
Heathrow | |
is allocating £550m for noise insulation and property compensation and | |
will launch a consultation with local people on proposals this summer. | |
About 750 homes would need to be compulsorily purchased to provide space | |
for a third runway. | |
The airport is proposing | |
compensation of 25% above unblighted market value plus stamp duty costs | |
and all legal fees in relation to purchasing a new home. For a £250,000 | |
property homeowners would receive £312,500 compensation, plus £7,500 | |
stamp duty costs and any legal fees. | |
Heathrow's chief | |
executive, Colin Matthews, said: "We are committed to treating those | |
most affected by a third runway fairly. Since the previous runway plan | |
was rejected in 2010 we have listened to ideas for how we could improve | |
our proposals. | |
"People have told us that we should provide more generous compensation and go further in insulating homes against noise. | |
"We | |
recognise that the expansion of Heathrow deserves an exceptional | |
compensation scheme. That's why we're going further than statutory | |
schemes or government guidance. People will receive fair compensation in | |
the event that Heathrow expansion goes ahead." | |
A third | |
runway at Heathrow is one of the options for airport expansion in | |
south-east England that have been shortlisted by the Airports | |
Commission, which is headed by the former Financial Services Authority | |
chief Sir Howard Davies. | |
The plan put forward by Heathrow Airport Ltd is for a 3,500-metre runway to the north-west of the airport. | |
The | |
commission is also considering a rival Heathrow scheme put forward by | |
Heathrow Hub, a group of civil engineers which includes the former | |
Concorde pilot Jon Lowe. Theirs is a proposal to extend the existing | |
northern runway to at least 6,000 metres. | |
A second runway | |
at Gatwick airport in West Sussex is the other shortlisted option. In | |
addition, the commission is having a further look at the option of a new | |
airport in the Thames estuary – the so-called "Boris Island" scheme | |
favoured by London's mayor, Boris Johnson. | |
Bosses | |
at Gatwick are submitting their own detailed expansion plans to the | |
commission this week. Gatwick said on Tuesday that its £7.8bn second | |
runway project was far cheaper and more beneficial than Heathrow's. It | |
said expansion at Gatwick would: | |
• Enable more people to | |
fly to more destinations – 10 million more passengers each year would be | |
able to travel with a second runway at Gatwick than with a third runway | |
at Heathrow. | |
• Generate more competition, keeping fares | |
low, and delivering £40bn more in economic benefits to the UK than | |
expansion at Heathrow. | |
• Be delivered about five years earlier than a third runway at Heathrow at no additional cost or risk to the taxpayer. | |
• Deliver more than 120,000 jobs in London and south-east England, rebalancing the economy away from an overheated M4 corridor. | |
• | |
Affect fewer people with noise – a second runway at Gatwick would | |
impact only 14,000 people compared to the 240,000 people impacted by | |
noise from Heathrow today. | |
Stewart Wingate, Gatwick's | |
chief executive, said: "As we reach this critical point in the aviation | |
debate it is clear that the Airports Commission has a very real choice | |
to make: expand Gatwick and create genuine competition in the market | |
with lower fares for everyone, or move back to a London airport market | |
dominated by a single player and saddle the next generation with higher | |
air fares. | |
"Why would you choose to fly a quarter of a | |
million more planes every year over one of the world's most densely | |
populated cities when instead you can fly them mostly over fields? | |
"Why | |
tunnel part of the busiest motorway in Europe – the M25 – causing | |
serious traffic disruption, when you can build on land already set aside | |
for expansion? The choice is an obvious one. Expand the best and only | |
deliverable option – Gatwick – and create a market that serves | |
everyone." |