This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/may/02/big-pharma-my-cancer-patient-and-me

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Big Pharma, my cancer patient and me Big Pharma, my cancer patient and me
(about 1 hour later)
After failing twoAfter failing two
types of chemotherapy for advanced cancer, my patient knew that her lease ontypes of chemotherapy for advanced cancer, my patient knew that her lease on
life was short, but a cherished family event stood in the way. "My son is goinglife was short, but a cherished family event stood in the way. "My son is going
to propose at the Christmas table, I just want to make it there." Her son hasto propose at the Christmas table, I just want to make it there." Her son has
been her anchor throughout her challenge; I could see why his engagement mattered so much. But Christmas wasbeen her anchor throughout her challenge; I could see why his engagement mattered so much. But Christmas was
still some months away, and I feared the feat will be difficult.still some months away, and I feared the feat will be difficult.
"I am not afraid"I am not afraid
to die but I just want to know that I gave it my all." This is an all tooto die but I just want to know that I gave it my all." This is an all too
frequent exchange, unfailingly poignant, often heart-wrenching. An entirelyfrequent exchange, unfailingly poignant, often heart-wrenching. An entirely
reasonable answer would be to gently reiterate the lack of meaningfulreasonable answer would be to gently reiterate the lack of meaningful
chemotherapy, broach the benefit of good palliative care, and allow for regretchemotherapy, broach the benefit of good palliative care, and allow for regret
at both our ends. Contrary to popular belief that mythologizes every patientat both our ends. Contrary to popular belief that mythologizes every patient
raging against cancer to the very end, for many this discussion eases theraging against cancer to the very end, for many this discussion eases the
burden of expectation and allows for a peaceful end.burden of expectation and allows for a peaceful end.
But thisBut this
relatively young mother was simply not ready yet. "I would happily die rightrelatively young mother was simply not ready yet. "I would happily die right
after he proposed" she smileed, reminding me that her goalpost had never after he proposed" she smiled, reminding me that her goalposts had never
changed. When a patient like that looks you in the eye, it isn’t easy tochanged. When a patient like that looks you in the eye, it isn’t easy to
separate foreboding statistics and human longing into two neat piles and denyseparate foreboding statistics and human longing into two neat piles and deny
hope.hope.
My head said thatMy head said that
another chemotherapy drug wouldn't make a significant survival difference. But myanother chemotherapy drug wouldn't make a significant survival difference. But my
heart urged me to try, if not to boost survival, then merely to reassure herheart urged me to try, if not to boost survival, then merely to reassure her
that she gave it her best shot. Put simply, we both knew that the gesture willthat she gave it her best shot. Put simply, we both knew that the gesture will
be more therapeutic than the drug itself, hardly a rare observation inbe more therapeutic than the drug itself, hardly a rare observation in
medicine.medicine.
I wrote to a largeI wrote to a large
pharmaceutical company for compassionate access to a common chemotherapy that’spharmaceutical company for compassionate access to a common chemotherapy that’s
not government subsidised for her precise type of cancer (most likely becausenot government subsidised for her precise type of cancer (most likely because
patients typically don’t live long enough to need it). It is a relatively oldpatients typically don’t live long enough to need it). It is a relatively old
and cheap drug, importantly with manageable toxicity, and I requested a month’sand cheap drug, importantly with manageable toxicity, and I requested a month’s
supply to gauge response. I added that the patient does not expect recurrentsupply to gauge response. I added that the patient does not expect recurrent
funding in case she responds to the drug, addressing a legitimate concern. In afunding in case she responds to the drug, addressing a legitimate concern. In a
world where we frequently push the boundaries or prescribe chemotherapy in moreworld where we frequently push the boundaries or prescribe chemotherapy in more
questionable circumstances, I feel comfortable that what I am really doing isquestionable circumstances, I feel comfortable that what I am really doing is
asking the company to be my partner in nurturing hope. Which is after all whatasking the company to be my partner in nurturing hope. Which is after all what
every pharmaceutical representative has told me for as long as I have known.every pharmaceutical representative has told me for as long as I have known.
So I simply don’tSo I simply don’t
believe it when my request is declined. Thinking this to be a mistake, Ibelieve it when my request is declined. Thinking this to be a mistake, I
protest further up the chain, pointing out to a senior executive that onlyprotest further up the chain, pointing out to a senior executive that only
recently the company had offered me conference sponsorship worth thousands morerecently the company had offered me conference sponsorship worth thousands more
than the small cost of the chemotherapy. The apologies come fast, but thethan the small cost of the chemotherapy. The apologies come fast, but the
explanations are notably absent.explanations are notably absent.
My naive puzzlementMy naive puzzlement
slowly turns into the realisation that almost every instance where a companyslowly turns into the realisation that almost every instance where a company
has facilitated compassionate access to a product, it has been as a form ofhas facilitated compassionate access to a product, it has been as a form of
marketing as a means of gaining lucrative, government-subsidised listing. Inmarketing as a means of gaining lucrative, government-subsidised listing. In
the era of astonishingly expensive blockbuster drugs, government subsidisationthe era of astonishingly expensive blockbuster drugs, government subsidisation
is the holy grail of big pharma. The cost of treating a few hundred or even ais the holy grail of big pharma. The cost of treating a few hundred or even a
few thousand patients for free (and in the process, securing the backing offew thousand patients for free (and in the process, securing the backing of
doctors), is negligible when the ultimate prize is full government subsidy. Indeed,doctors), is negligible when the ultimate prize is full government subsidy. Indeed,
individuals and organisations including the UK’s NICE and Australia’s PBS areindividuals and organisations including the UK’s NICE and Australia’s PBS are
now questioning the feasibility of subsidising drugs that can cost as much as AU$200,000 a year for ambiguous benefit.now questioning the feasibility of subsidising drugs that can cost as much as AU$200,000 a year for ambiguous benefit.
CompassionateCompassionate
access schemes for these incredibly expensive drugs might facilitate access foraccess schemes for these incredibly expensive drugs might facilitate access for
selected patients but they are not truly compassionate in the way that theselected patients but they are not truly compassionate in the way that the
average person understands. Pharmaceutical companies sell an ethically murkyaverage person understands. Pharmaceutical companies sell an ethically murky
kind of hope than what doctors and their patients might understand. The benefitkind of hope than what doctors and their patients might understand. The benefit
to the company must ultimately outweigh the benefit to the individual patient.to the company must ultimately outweigh the benefit to the individual patient.
If subsidy looks unlikely, access schemes are retired, sometimes abruptly. WhenIf subsidy looks unlikely, access schemes are retired, sometimes abruptly. When
a commonplace drug is neither vying for market recognition nor fighting fora commonplace drug is neither vying for market recognition nor fighting for
subsidisation, there is no incentive to provide it to a patient like mine,subsidisation, there is no incentive to provide it to a patient like mine,
whose story would anyway never be the stuff of headlines.whose story would anyway never be the stuff of headlines.
You might ask theYou might ask the
obvious question as to why it would take so long for an oncologist to figureobvious question as to why it would take so long for an oncologist to figure
out that a pharmaceutical company is not a charity. The common argument is thatout that a pharmaceutical company is not a charity. The common argument is that
companies must necessarily recoup the cost of drug development, as only a smallcompanies must necessarily recoup the cost of drug development, as only a small
minority succeed in the marketplace.minority succeed in the marketplace.
But for every dollar spent on research,But for every dollar spent on research,
nearly twice is spent on lobbying and marketing – and it is also this expensenearly twice is spent on lobbying and marketing – and it is also this expense
that companies want to recover. From the time they are students, doctors arethat companies want to recover. From the time they are students, doctors are
exposed to relentless advertising that big pharma is their companion inexposed to relentless advertising that big pharma is their companion in
healthcare. The glory days of advertising saw doctors offered egregious formshealthcare. The glory days of advertising saw doctors offered egregious forms
of largesse, from conferences hosted in ancient castles and on cruises toof largesse, from conferences hosted in ancient castles and on cruises to
lavish dining and entertainment. Then there were the rivers of pens post-itlavish dining and entertainment. Then there were the rivers of pens post-it
notes, stress balls and cute toys to influence prescribing. Regulation is much tighternotes, stress balls and cute toys to influence prescribing. Regulation is much tighter
today, but there is still plenty of money in sponsorships, paid speaking tours,today, but there is still plenty of money in sponsorships, paid speaking tours,
adding one’s credible name to journal articles, and just promoting a drug toadding one’s credible name to journal articles, and just promoting a drug to
one’s peers, especially if you are anointed a key opinion leader.one’s peers, especially if you are anointed a key opinion leader.
Drug companiesDrug companies
think nothing of sending a representative to wait for three hours in a clinicthink nothing of sending a representative to wait for three hours in a clinic
to spend five minutes with a doctor. Unlike other people, these people neverto spend five minutes with a doctor. Unlike other people, these people never
ever express frustration at the ludicrous wait and are unfailingly courteous. Theyever express frustration at the ludicrous wait and are unfailingly courteous. They
ask subtly about you, your family and your holidays. They probe yourask subtly about you, your family and your holidays. They probe your
prescribing habit and tell you why your peers prefer their drug. They routinelyprescribing habit and tell you why your peers prefer their drug. They routinely
ask what would make it even easier for you to prescribe their drug. It is impossibleask what would make it even easier for you to prescribe their drug. It is impossible
to navigate the discussion towards cost or what makes for the greater societalto navigate the discussion towards cost or what makes for the greater societal
good.good.
And to be honest,And to be honest,
it’s unseemly to be anything but polite towards someone who has waited hours toit’s unseemly to be anything but polite towards someone who has waited hours to
see you, seems genuinely nice, and from whom you might need a favour for yoursee you, seems genuinely nice, and from whom you might need a favour for your
next patient. These favours are rare but the younger you are, the morenext patient. These favours are rare but the younger you are, the more
impressionable. No wonder many medical schools and hospitals have bannedimpressionable. No wonder many medical schools and hospitals have banned
pharmaceutical representative visits, hopefully signalling to doctors that thepharmaceutical representative visits, hopefully signalling to doctors that the
sandwiches have a hidden cost.sandwiches have a hidden cost.
Eventually, I tellEventually, I tell
my patient that my request for compassionate access was denied. Crushed, shemy patient that my request for compassionate access was denied. Crushed, she
asks if she wasn’t important enough. "That’s not true", I say unconvincingly, "it’s just the way it is." She dies, with a few weeks to go before Christmas,asks if she wasn’t important enough. "That’s not true", I say unconvincingly, "it’s just the way it is." She dies, with a few weeks to go before Christmas,
leaving me to wonder whether the drug might just have bridged the small gap. Ileaving me to wonder whether the drug might just have bridged the small gap. I
will never know, but feeling morally compromised by the whole exchange, I tellwill never know, but feeling morally compromised by the whole exchange, I tell
the drug company that I won’t see its representatives in future.the drug company that I won’t see its representatives in future.
I didn’t expect anI didn’t expect an
acknowledgment but when it came, it sounded like a thinly veiled warning thatacknowledgment but when it came, it sounded like a thinly veiled warning that
the visits were an essential prerequisite to receiving favours. An incredulousthe visits were an essential prerequisite to receiving favours. An incredulous
representative exclaims, "you would really do that, stop seeing us due to whatrepresentative exclaims, "you would really do that, stop seeing us due to what
happened with that one patient?"happened with that one patient?"
But "that oneBut "that one
patient" represented the human face of what happens when the interests of apatient" represented the human face of what happens when the interests of a
patient and the pharmaceutical company don’t align. That one patient’s crushedpatient and the pharmaceutical company don’t align. That one patient’s crushed
hope felt no less important than the renewed hopes of another. What happenedhope felt no less important than the renewed hopes of another. What happened
with that one patient finally opened my eyes to what has gone before.with that one patient finally opened my eyes to what has gone before.
It seems only rightIt seems only right
to start by paying tribute to my patient, while acknowledging myto start by paying tribute to my patient, while acknowledging my
complicity in the thorny tangle of doctors, patients and drug companies.complicity in the thorny tangle of doctors, patients and drug companies.