This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-27238201

The article has changed 8 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 4 Version 5
Serious fraud trial halted amid legal row Legal aid row leads to halting of serious fraud trial
(35 minutes later)
A judge has halted a serious fraud trial after defendants claimed they could not get adequate representation because of cuts to legal aid.A judge has halted a serious fraud trial after defendants claimed they could not get adequate representation because of cuts to legal aid.
Alex Cameron QC - the prime minister's brother, working free of charge on the bid to halt the case - said the defendants would not get a fair trial.Alex Cameron QC - the prime minister's brother, working free of charge on the bid to halt the case - said the defendants would not get a fair trial.
The Ministry of Justice said there were "suitably qualified" lawyers available.The Ministry of Justice said there were "suitably qualified" lawyers available.
Many barristers are refusing to take on long or complex cases because their fees have been cut by 30%.Many barristers are refusing to take on long or complex cases because their fees have been cut by 30%.
Judge Anthony Leonard told Southwark Crown Court that the defence had made "very substantial... but unsuccessful" efforts to find barristers to fight the defendants' case.Judge Anthony Leonard told Southwark Crown Court that the defence had made "very substantial... but unsuccessful" efforts to find barristers to fight the defendants' case.
It would be a "violation" of the legal process to allow the case to proceed, he added.It would be a "violation" of the legal process to allow the case to proceed, he added.
Contracts terminatedContracts terminated
The case was brought last year by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) against Scott Crawley and seven other men.The case was brought last year by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) against Scott Crawley and seven other men.
It concerned the activities of Plott UK Ltd, European Property Investments Ltd and Stirling Alexander Ltd.It concerned the activities of Plott UK Ltd, European Property Investments Ltd and Stirling Alexander Ltd.
The companies are believed to have taken more than £5m from UK investors between 2008 and 2011, the FCA said at the time.The companies are believed to have taken more than £5m from UK investors between 2008 and 2011, the FCA said at the time.
Outside court, one of the defendant's lawyers said the collapse of the trial should be a "wake-up call" to ministers.Outside court, one of the defendant's lawyers said the collapse of the trial should be a "wake-up call" to ministers.
"It is in the interests of justice for both sides that serious and complex cases of this sort should be properly prosecuted and properly tried," said solicitor Philip Smith."It is in the interests of justice for both sides that serious and complex cases of this sort should be properly prosecuted and properly tried," said solicitor Philip Smith.
"That means with equality of arms whereby you have the best barristers on both sides.""That means with equality of arms whereby you have the best barristers on both sides."
He said the involvement of the prime minister's brother had been "absolutely pivotal" in persuading the judge he could stop the trial.He said the involvement of the prime minister's brother had been "absolutely pivotal" in persuading the judge he could stop the trial.
Arguing on Monday that the case against five defendants should not go ahead, Mr Cameron said: "A stay is exceptional, but so is lack of representation in this country. We are worried about a fair trial.Arguing on Monday that the case against five defendants should not go ahead, Mr Cameron said: "A stay is exceptional, but so is lack of representation in this country. We are worried about a fair trial.
"It's not the fault of the FCA but we do [blame] the state more widely.""It's not the fault of the FCA but we do [blame] the state more widely."
The government has cut the fees for complex, high-cost cases by 30%, and in other Crown Court work by up to 18%.The government has cut the fees for complex, high-cost cases by 30%, and in other Crown Court work by up to 18%.
'Beyond question''Beyond question'
Nigel Lithman QC, chairman of the Criminal Bar Association which has been opposing government cuts to legal aid, said skilled and experienced advocates were essential in very high-cost cases (VHCCs).Nigel Lithman QC, chairman of the Criminal Bar Association which has been opposing government cuts to legal aid, said skilled and experienced advocates were essential in very high-cost cases (VHCCs).
"Each advocate who had signed a contract to undertake a VHCC case was presented by the government with a choice - either to accept a 30% cut in their fees or to terminate their contract. They chose to terminate their contracts," he said."Each advocate who had signed a contract to undertake a VHCC case was presented by the government with a choice - either to accept a 30% cut in their fees or to terminate their contract. They chose to terminate their contracts," he said.
"Since then, we understand that no barrister has signed a new contract to undertake a VHCC at the reduced rates.""Since then, we understand that no barrister has signed a new contract to undertake a VHCC at the reduced rates."
Legal aid costs about £2bn a year - half goes on criminal defence and the rest on civil cases including mental health, asylum and family law involving domestic violence, forced marriage or child abduction.Legal aid costs about £2bn a year - half goes on criminal defence and the rest on civil cases including mental health, asylum and family law involving domestic violence, forced marriage or child abduction.
The Ministry of Justice said in a statement: "Barristers have refused to work on this case - and a number of other very high-cost court cases - because they do not agree with savings the government is making to legal aid.The Ministry of Justice said in a statement: "Barristers have refused to work on this case - and a number of other very high-cost court cases - because they do not agree with savings the government is making to legal aid.
"Even after the savings, if a QC picked up a case like this one, they could expect to receive around £100,000 for working on it, with a junior barrister receiving around £60,000."Even after the savings, if a QC picked up a case like this one, they could expect to receive around £100,000 for working on it, with a junior barrister receiving around £60,000.
"The government has made sure that the Public Defender Service (PDS) has a number of suitably qualified advocates who could act in this case.""The government has made sure that the Public Defender Service (PDS) has a number of suitably qualified advocates who could act in this case."
However, in his ruling Judge Leonard said it was "beyond question" that the PDS was "not in a position to provide sufficient representation".However, in his ruling Judge Leonard said it was "beyond question" that the PDS was "not in a position to provide sufficient representation".
The case against the men was "complex and substantial", the court heard, involving 46,030 pages of evidence and 864,000 lines of spreadsheet data.The case against the men was "complex and substantial", the court heard, involving 46,030 pages of evidence and 864,000 lines of spreadsheet data.
In their search for suitable representation, the defence team contacted 70 barrister chambers with the only one who put himself forward withdrawing in January.In their search for suitable representation, the defence team contacted 70 barrister chambers with the only one who put himself forward withdrawing in January.
It had been feared the defendants would have to defend themselves - but prosecutors agreed this would have been a breach of their human rights.It had been feared the defendants would have to defend themselves - but prosecutors agreed this would have been a breach of their human rights.
Shadow justice secretary Sadiq Khan said: "Time and again ministers have been warned their changes to legal aid could lead to miscarriages of justice and trials collapsing. Today, these warnings have come true."
Speaking just before case was halted, Lord Neuberger, the President of the Supreme Court, told BBC Radio 5 Live he feared there was "a serious risk of people being denied access to justice" as a result of legal aid cuts.Speaking just before case was halted, Lord Neuberger, the President of the Supreme Court, told BBC Radio 5 Live he feared there was "a serious risk of people being denied access to justice" as a result of legal aid cuts.
The FCA said it was considering the decision and would not comment further.The FCA said it was considering the decision and would not comment further.