This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/may/01/abolish-low-interest-farm-loans-and-scale-back-disaster-relief-audit-recommends
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 1 | Version 2 |
---|---|
Abolish low-interest farm loans and scale back disaster relief, says audit | Abolish low-interest farm loans and scale back disaster relief, says audit |
(4 months later) | |
The government should abolish low interest loans for farmers except in the case of drought relief and should pare back disaster relief payments, according to the Commission of Audit. | |
It would also cut funding for the Rural Research and Development Corporation, which is jointly funded by government and industry. | It would also cut funding for the Rural Research and Development Corporation, which is jointly funded by government and industry. |
The Farm Finance Concessional Loans Scheme was introduced under Labor to help farmers improve their productivity and restructure business. Interest is currently charged at 4.5%. | |
This is separate to the recently announced – and yet to start – drought concessional loans, which will be offered at an interest rate of 4%. | |
The commission also recommends a restructure of disaster relief which if implemented would see the end of a Newstart-style payment to employees, small business and farmers for loss of income for up to 13 weeks. The Disaster Recovery Allowance is designed to provide short-term income support. | |
The commission says the payment provides “poor signals to employers to undertake better business and risk planning”. | |
The commission would also abolish the commonwealth’s Natural Disaster Relief and Recovery Arrangements on the grounds that it duplicates state responsibilities. | |
They recommend instead one-off grant payments on per-disaster basis. Due to recent disasters, the commission says “large and volatile expenditure poses significant and on-going risks to the budget”. | |
It suggests the disaster grants based on each disaster paid at between 25-33% of estimated reconstruction costs. | |