This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/scotland/tayside_and_central/7080649.stm

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Contempt hearing on terror case Contempt hearing on terror case
(30 minutes later)
A lawyer who represented a man convicted of terror offences is to face a contempt of court hearing after criticising the trial.A lawyer who represented a man convicted of terror offences is to face a contempt of court hearing after criticising the trial.
The move follows a statement read by Aamer Anwar outside the High Court in Glasgow in September.The move follows a statement read by Aamer Anwar outside the High Court in Glasgow in September.
He said Mohammed Atif Siddique did not receive a fair trial and it took place in an "atmosphere of hostility".He said Mohammed Atif Siddique did not receive a fair trial and it took place in an "atmosphere of hostility".
Trial judge Lord Carloway said the matter should now be considered by the High Court in Edinburgh.Trial judge Lord Carloway said the matter should now be considered by the High Court in Edinburgh.
Siddique, 21, from Alva, in Clackmannanshire, was convicted of three terror charges and was sentenced to eight years in prison.Siddique, 21, from Alva, in Clackmannanshire, was convicted of three terror charges and was sentenced to eight years in prison.
The Glasgow lawyer described the verdict as a "tragedy for justice".The Glasgow lawyer described the verdict as a "tragedy for justice".
LORD CARLOWAY'S STATEMENT Read the judge's comments [28KB] Most computers will open this document automatically, but you may need Adobe Reader Download the reader hereLORD CARLOWAY'S STATEMENT Read the judge's comments [28KB] Most computers will open this document automatically, but you may need Adobe Reader Download the reader here
Siddique's solicitor also said that the prosecution was "driven by the State".Siddique's solicitor also said that the prosecution was "driven by the State".
Mr Anwar faces a hearing before up to three judges at the High Court.Mr Anwar faces a hearing before up to three judges at the High Court.
In his written note, Lord Carloway said the remarks made by Mr Anwar were his personal views.In his written note, Lord Carloway said the remarks made by Mr Anwar were his personal views.
He described the statement to the media after the verdict as a "multi-faceted tirade".He described the statement to the media after the verdict as a "multi-faceted tirade".
"The remarks appeared to be an unjustified attack on almost every area of the trial process, other than the defence," said Lord Carloway."The remarks appeared to be an unjustified attack on almost every area of the trial process, other than the defence," said Lord Carloway.
The judge said that "the statement seems to be an attack on the fairness of the trial and thus presumably an attack on the court itself".The judge said that "the statement seems to be an attack on the fairness of the trial and thus presumably an attack on the court itself".
He added: "I will remit this matter for determination of the High Court in Edinburgh."He added: "I will remit this matter for determination of the High Court in Edinburgh."
A date has yet to be fixed for any further hearing in the matter.
During a hearing two weeks ago in front of Lord Carloway, Mr Anwar's counsel argued that the contents of the press release were meant to be the words of Siddique.