This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/08/world/asia/missing-malaysia-flight-370.html
The article has changed 11 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 1 | Version 2 |
---|---|
Jet Search Team Says Signals Are ‘Consistent’ With Black Boxes | Jet Search Team Says Signals Are ‘Consistent’ With Black Boxes |
(about 1 hour later) | |
KUALA LUMPUR, Malaysia — An Australian naval ship searching for the missing Malaysia Airlines plane in the Indian Ocean has twice detected underwater signals in the past two days “consistent with” those of a plane’s data and cockpit voice recorders, possibly from the missing jet, the lead coordinator of the multinational search said Monday. | |
“Clearly, this is a most promising lead,” the official, Angus Houston, said at a news conference in Perth, Australia. He called the signals “probably the best information that we have had” in the search, which in the past week and a half has focused on an area of the Indian Ocean roughly the size of Poland. | |
“I’m much more optimistic than I was a week ago,” he said. | “I’m much more optimistic than I was a week ago,” he said. |
Mr. Houston cautioned that determining the nature and source of the signals might take several days. | |
A discovery of the plane using sonic technology would be particularly extraordinary considering that the batteries in the recorders, commonly known as black boxes, are expected to expire as soon as this week. Once the batteries are dead, the boxes’ sonic beacons will cease to operate, making the discovery of undersea wreckage far more difficult. | |
Search forces began deploying the underwater listening technology only last Friday, in a last-ditch effort to hear the black boxes’ signals before they faded. | |
The two “signal detections,” as Mr. Houston called them, were picked up by Ocean Shield, a Royal Australian Navy vessel, using sensor technology supplied by the United States Navy. They occurred within a 24-hour period over the weekend in the northern part of the current search zone, hundreds of miles off the west coast of Australia. | |
The first detection, which happened sometime overnight between Saturday and Sunday, lasted about 2 hours 20 minutes, he said. The ship lost contact, turned around, and then picked up the signal again for about 13 minutes, he said. | |
He added that it might take officials several days to determine whether the sounds were from the missing plane. | |
“This is not the end of the search,” he said. “We’ve still got a lot of difficult, painstaking work to do.” | “This is not the end of the search,” he said. “We’ve still got a lot of difficult, painstaking work to do.” |
“In deep oceanic water,” he cautioned, “nothing happens fast.” | |
The announcement seemed to offer the best indication so far that after more than four weeks of fruitless searching across vast areas of sea and land in the Eastern Hemisphere, officials might finally be zeroing in on concrete evidence of the plane and its fate. | |
“I would now like to find some wreckage because that will help solve the mystery,” Mr. Houston said. “Fundamentally, without wreckage, we can’t say it is definitely here.” | |
The Malaysia Airlines plane disappeared on March 8 with 239 people on board after it veered off its scheduled route from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing, and vanished from civilian and military radar. Based on analyses of satellite data, officials concluded that the flight ended somewhere in the southern Indian Ocean. | |
Further data analysis has refined the search, and in the past week and a half ships and aircraft from several nations have been combing a broad swath of the Indian Ocean off the coast of Western Australia. | |
Despite these efforts, no confirmed debris from the jet has been found. Since it last detected the signal, on Sunday, Ocean Shield has continued to try to locate it again without success, Mr. Houston said. The vessel is outfitted with a so-called towed pinger locator, a batwing-shaped device that is towed behind the vessel, deep in the water, and can pick up signals from the black boxes’ beacons. | |
Mr. Houston said Ocean Shield would continue to use the locator to try to narrow the location of the signals, a process that could take several days. Once a more precise area is defined, he said, searchers will deploy a remote-controlled submarine to map the seabed. | |
Mr. Houston said the sea at Ocean Shield’s location is about 2.8 miles deep — about the furthest the submarine, a Bluefin-21, can dive. | |
If the search teams are unable to fix the location using the listening equipment, he said, then they might use the Bluefin to “have a look” in the area most likely to be the source of the transmissions. | |
If the plane’s black boxes are found, the effort will become a recovery operation. At such ocean depths, Mr. Houston warned, that could take “a long, long time,” measurable in months. | |
Officials continued to caution against drawing any conclusions about the source of the signals, warning that false alerts could be set off by sea life — including whales — or by noise from ships, among other causes. | |
Mr. Houston said he doubted that the signals detected by Ocean Shield were caused by natural sources. But, he added, “Strange things do happen in the ocean, and I would want more confirmation before we say, ‘This is it.’ ” | |
Over the weekend, searchers’ hopes had shifted to a spot about 375 miles southwest of Ocean Shield, and about 1,000 miles northwest of Perth, where a Chinese ship in the flotilla had reported capturing two signals thought to be from the flight’s black boxes. | |
A ship from the British Navy also equipped with underwater listening technology was diverted from another area in the Indian Ocean to investigate the findings of the Chinese vessel, which reported that its underwater devices had picked up signals on Friday and Saturday that were consistent with the pings emitted by a plane’s black boxes. In all, there were nine military planes, three civilian planes and 14 ships participating in the search effort on Monday. | |
Mr. Houston said that the signals picked up by the Chinese vessel, Haixun 01, would still be pursued. | |
“We have to prosecute both contacts,” he said. “We don’t know at the moment, we don’t have any confirmation, that one or the other is significant enough for us to say, ‘Yes, this is where the aircraft is.’ We have to have further confirmation, and I would put it to you that we cannot confirm until we have found some wreckage.” | “We have to prosecute both contacts,” he said. “We don’t know at the moment, we don’t have any confirmation, that one or the other is significant enough for us to say, ‘Yes, this is where the aircraft is.’ We have to have further confirmation, and I would put it to you that we cannot confirm until we have found some wreckage.” |
Mr. Houston said it was “unlikely” that the signals heard by Haixun 01 came from the same source as the signals heard by the Australian vessel. “But in deep water, funny things happen with acoustic signals,” he said. | |