This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/apr/02/third-gender-must-be-recognised-by-nsw-after-norrie-wins-legal-battle

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Third gender must be recognised by NSW after Norrie wins legal battle Third gender must be recognised by NSW after Norrie wins legal battle
(about 3 hours later)
The high court has ruled that New South Wales must recognise a third gender after handing down its decision in the long-running case of Norrie, who has been fighting since 2010 to have a sex change recognised as non-specific. The Australian high court has ruled that New South Wales must recognise a third gender after handing down its decision in the long-running case of Norrie, who has been fighting since 2010 to have a sex change recognised as non-specific.
Norrie had applied for a name change and non-recognition of gender in 2010, having never identified as either sex since gender reassignment surgery in Scotland in 1989. Norrie had applied for a name change and “non-specific” gender in 2010, having not identified as either sex since gender reassignment surgery in Scotland in 1989.
The NSW Registry of Births, Deaths and Marriages revoked its earlier decision in support of Norrie’s application, and Norrie took it to the court of appeal in 2012. The court found in Norrie’s favour but the registrar appealed to the high court.The NSW Registry of Births, Deaths and Marriages revoked its earlier decision in support of Norrie’s application, and Norrie took it to the court of appeal in 2012. The court found in Norrie’s favour but the registrar appealed to the high court.
Norrie’s legal team argued that to force Norrie to identify as either male or female when Norrie belonged in neither specification would maintain a fiction, the ABC reported. Norrie’s legal team argued that to force Norrie to identify as either male or female when Norrie belonged in neither specification would maintain a fiction.
The ACT is currently the only jurisdiction to recognise a third category of gender, although commonwealth-issued passports do. Among the arguments of the registrar was that it would cause “unacceptable confusion” if state legislation, the Births, Deaths and Marriages Registration Act 1995 (NSW), were to recognise more than two genders. The high court rejected the argument.
“The question in this appeal is whether it was within the registrar's power to record in the register that the sex of the respondent, Norrie, was, as she said in her application, 'not specific',” the high court said. The Australian Classified Territory is currently the only Australian jurisdiction to recognise a third category of gender, although commonwealth-issued passports do.
“That question should be answered in the affirmative.” The five-judge panel of the high court ruled unanimously, in what Norrie’s lawyer, Scott McDonald of DLA Piper, said was a rare fast turnaround.
“The question in this appeal is whether it was within the registrar's power to record in the register that the sex of the respondent, Norrie, was, as she said in her application, 'not specific',” the high court said. “That question should be answered in the affirmative.”
Norrie said it was a “great outcome” particularly that it happened so quickly and applies Australia-wide, not just in NSW.
“Maybe people will understand there’s more options than the binary,” Norrie told reporters in Sydney on Wednesday. “Even if an individual might be male or female their friends might not be.”
Of the personal toll the four-year fight had taken, Norrie joked: “It was swings and roundabouts, but I’m on Wikipedia now. And these people have done the hard work. I didn’t have to stand up in court.”
Norrie added: “It’s important for people to have equal rights in society. Why should people be left out because they’re seen as not male or female? They should be recognised wherever they are and allowed to participate in society at an equal level.”
The ruling will affect some states that have similarly worded legislation to NSW. “A couple of states have similar legislation – Victoria and Queensland. WA has quite different legislation,” McDonald said. “It won’t be binding [there]. It will have persuasive authority.
“To the extent it sent a message of what the high court expects, and that sex is not binary, I think that’s a message that can be felt through the states’ legislation on this issue.”
There are a number of countries around the world which recognise a third or non-specific gender beyond passports, including Germany and Nepal.
The court found the act does not require a person who has undergone a sex affirmation procedure and remains “of indeterminate sex” has to be registered as either male or female.
“The act itself recognises that a person may be other than male or female and therefore may be taken to permit the registration sought, as ‘non-specific’,” read the judgment.
The court also ordered the registrar to pay Norrie’s court costs.