This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk/7070396.stm
The article has changed 11 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 8 | Version 9 |
---|---|
Lords want control order rethink | Lords want control order rethink |
(about 1 hour later) | |
The Law Lords have ordered the government to reconsider control orders imposed on eight terrorism suspects. | The Law Lords have ordered the government to reconsider control orders imposed on eight terrorism suspects. |
But they did not declare the controversial anti-terrorism measure to be completely unlawful. | But they did not declare the controversial anti-terrorism measure to be completely unlawful. |
In rulings on six individuals, the Lords said control orders which included 18-hour curfews, restricting someone to their homes, were too long. | In rulings on six individuals, the Lords said control orders which included 18-hour curfews, restricting someone to their homes, were too long. |
The Lords ordered the courts to rethink two other cases because the proceedings had breached a right to a fair hearing. | The Lords ordered the courts to rethink two other cases because the proceedings had breached a right to a fair hearing. |
Under the control order system, the Home Office can impose daily curfews, restrictions on whom a subject can meet and where they are allowed to go. | Under the control order system, the Home Office can impose daily curfews, restrictions on whom a subject can meet and where they are allowed to go. |
Subjects must also report daily to police and are banned from using mobile phones, email or the internet. | Subjects must also report daily to police and are banned from using mobile phones, email or the internet. |
Ministers say the system is necessary for people where there is intelligence they are involved in terrorism - but not enough evidence for a prosecution. | Ministers say the system is necessary for people where there is intelligence they are involved in terrorism - but not enough evidence for a prosecution. |
Key challenge | Key challenge |
In the key challenge of four before the Lords, six Iraqi men, two of whom later absconded, had argued 18-hour home curfews had breached their fundamental right to liberty. | In the key challenge of four before the Lords, six Iraqi men, two of whom later absconded, had argued 18-hour home curfews had breached their fundamental right to liberty. |
WHAT THE LAW LORDS SAID 18-hour curfews: Unfair Some evidence procedures: Unfair Shorter curfews: legalWider regime: legal Q and A: Control orders | WHAT THE LAW LORDS SAID 18-hour curfews: Unfair Some evidence procedures: Unfair Shorter curfews: legalWider regime: legal Q and A: Control orders |
Three of the five Lords agreed and said the home secretary should only be able to order shorter curfews. | Three of the five Lords agreed and said the home secretary should only be able to order shorter curfews. |
The ruling has no practical effect on the subjects because the home secretary had already issued less restrictive curfews. | The ruling has no practical effect on the subjects because the home secretary had already issued less restrictive curfews. |
But in a crucial victory for the government, all five Law Lords agreed the regime did not amount to a criminal punishment - and therefore did not need to abide by ordinary court procedures. | But in a crucial victory for the government, all five Law Lords agreed the regime did not amount to a criminal punishment - and therefore did not need to abide by ordinary court procedures. |
Fair trial | Fair trial |
Lord Bingham, the lead Law Lord issuing opinions, said he agreed two of the control orders had a devastating effect on the subjects and their families. | Lord Bingham, the lead Law Lord issuing opinions, said he agreed two of the control orders had a devastating effect on the subjects and their families. |
THE KEY CASES MB: British man in South YorkshireJJ and others: IraqisAF: UK/LibyanE: Tunisian Key cases profiled | THE KEY CASES MB: British man in South YorkshireJJ and others: IraqisAF: UK/LibyanE: Tunisian Key cases profiled |
In the case of MB, a Kuwaiti-born British national, and AF, a UK-Libyan, Lord Bingham said claims that they had been denied a fair trial were credible. | In the case of MB, a Kuwaiti-born British national, and AF, a UK-Libyan, Lord Bingham said claims that they had been denied a fair trial were credible. |
"I have difficulty in accepting that MB has enjoyed a substantial measure of procedural justice, or that the very essence of the right to fair hearing has not been impaired," said the Lord. | "I have difficulty in accepting that MB has enjoyed a substantial measure of procedural justice, or that the very essence of the right to fair hearing has not been impaired," said the Lord. |
"The right to a fair hearing is fundamental. In the absence of derogation [opting out of human rights law] it must be protected. It seems to me that it was not." | "The right to a fair hearing is fundamental. In the absence of derogation [opting out of human rights law] it must be protected. It seems to me that it was not." |
However, stopping short of ruling the system incompatible with human rights, he said the cases needed to be referred back to the courts for a rethink. | However, stopping short of ruling the system incompatible with human rights, he said the cases needed to be referred back to the courts for a rethink. |
The lords dismissed the ninth appeal of a Tunisian man known only as E. | The lords dismissed the ninth appeal of a Tunisian man known only as E. |
Ruling welcomed | Ruling welcomed |
Home Secretary Jacqui Smith said she welcomed the broad thrust of the rulings. | Home Secretary Jacqui Smith said she welcomed the broad thrust of the rulings. |
She said that control orders were not the "first choice" to deal with terrorism suspects - but there were cases where it was appropriate. | She said that control orders were not the "first choice" to deal with terrorism suspects - but there were cases where it was appropriate. |
"I'm very pleased that the Law Lords have upheld the regime," she told the BBC. "My top priority is national security and protection of the British people." | "I'm very pleased that the Law Lords have upheld the regime," she told the BBC. "My top priority is national security and protection of the British people." |
Ms Smith said she was disappointed that 18-hour curfews had been ruled out, but added no order would have to be "weakened" because of the rulings. | Ms Smith said she was disappointed that 18-hour curfews had been ruled out, but added no order would have to be "weakened" because of the rulings. |
But Shami Chakrabarti, of human rights group Liberty which was involved in the cases, said the judgements did not solve fundamental problems with the system. | But Shami Chakrabarti, of human rights group Liberty which was involved in the cases, said the judgements did not solve fundamental problems with the system. |
"These decisions will cause few celebrations at Liberty or the Home Office, and fully satisfy neither fairness nor security," said Ms Chakrabarti. | "These decisions will cause few celebrations at Liberty or the Home Office, and fully satisfy neither fairness nor security," said Ms Chakrabarti. |
"The authorities have rightly lost their most draconian 18-hour curfews without trial. Whilst that is a body blow to Blairite policy, it is now left to the Strasbourg Court or Westminster to restore the age-old right to a fair trial." | "The authorities have rightly lost their most draconian 18-hour curfews without trial. Whilst that is a body blow to Blairite policy, it is now left to the Strasbourg Court or Westminster to restore the age-old right to a fair trial." |
Shadow Home Secretary David Davis said ministers called for a review of control orders, saying ministers had been warned of inevitable challenges. | |
"They failed to heed that warning and today's judgment is the unfortunate, but predictable, consequence," he said. | |
Nick Clegg for the Liberal Democrats said the ruling represented a "further unravelling of a system which is wrong in principle and flawed in practice." |