This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/7068647.stm
The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Previous version
1
Next version
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
Bali trio lose execution dispute | Bali trio lose execution dispute |
(about 1 hour later) | |
Three Australians sentenced to death in Indonesia for drug smuggling have lost a legal challenge to the country's capital punishment laws. | Three Australians sentenced to death in Indonesia for drug smuggling have lost a legal challenge to the country's capital punishment laws. |
Lawyers for the men - members of the so-called Bali Nine group - had argued that Indonesia's constitution guaranteed their right to life. | Lawyers for the men - members of the so-called Bali Nine group - had argued that Indonesia's constitution guaranteed their right to life. |
A favourable ruling could have helped in an appeal against their sentences. | |
But the Constitutional Court in Jakarta ruled that the death penalty was allowable for drug trafficking. | But the Constitutional Court in Jakarta ruled that the death penalty was allowable for drug trafficking. |
Genocide comparison | |
The nine - eight men and one woman - were arrested in April 2005 after trying to take more than 8.3kg (18lb) of heroin from Bali to Australia. | |
Some were detained at Bali's airport with the drug strapped to their bodies while others were arrested in a nearby hotel room. | Some were detained at Bali's airport with the drug strapped to their bodies while others were arrested in a nearby hotel room. |
Six of the group were sentenced to death under the country's stringent drug laws - the others received lengthy jail terms. | |
Lawyers for three of those sentenced to death - Scott Rush, and the reputed ringleaders of the gang, Andrew Chan and Myuran Sukumaran - argued the punishment infringed their rights. | |
Two convicted Indonesian drug dealers also put their names to the legal petition. | |
But the nine-judge panel ruled against them, saying there was "no substantive difference" between drugs crimes and other serious crimes such as genocide. | |
They said there were limits on the right to life, and that it was important not to uphold rights of criminals at the expense of their victims. |
Previous version
1
Next version