This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/business/7067788.stm

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 4 Version 5
Exxon can appeal $2.5bn oil fine Exxon can contest $2.5bn oil fine
(1 day later)
Exxon Mobil has won the right to appeal against a $2.5bn (£1.21bn) damages bill relating to a 1989 Alaskan oil spill.Exxon Mobil has won the right to appeal against a $2.5bn (£1.21bn) damages bill relating to a 1989 Alaskan oil spill.
The US Supreme Court said it would hear the appeal against record damages due to victims of the Valdez oil spill.The US Supreme Court said it would hear the appeal against record damages due to victims of the Valdez oil spill.
The case has dragged on since 1994 with the US oil giant fighting to reduce the bill, which it has called excessive.The case has dragged on since 1994 with the US oil giant fighting to reduce the bill, which it has called excessive.
In what was one of the biggest ever oil spills, 11 million gallons of crude were released into Alaska's wilderness after the Exxon tanker hit a reef.In what was one of the biggest ever oil spills, 11 million gallons of crude were released into Alaska's wilderness after the Exxon tanker hit a reef.
About 1,300 miles (2,080km) of coastline was contaminated as a result of the oil spill.About 1,300 miles (2,080km) of coastline was contaminated as a result of the oil spill.
Constitutional issuesConstitutional issues
Captain of the Valdez, Joseph Hazelwood, admitted drinking vodka before boarding the vessel, but was subsequently acquitted of operating a ship while intoxicated.Captain of the Valdez, Joseph Hazelwood, admitted drinking vodka before boarding the vessel, but was subsequently acquitted of operating a ship while intoxicated.
This record punitive award unquestionably raises important issues of constitutional dimension Walter Dellinger, Exxon lawyerThis record punitive award unquestionably raises important issues of constitutional dimension Walter Dellinger, Exxon lawyer
Exxon argues that it cannot be held responsible for the actions of Mr Hazelwood and says that the $2.5bn penalty is excessive under marine law and when compared with other federal rulings on punitive damages.Exxon argues that it cannot be held responsible for the actions of Mr Hazelwood and says that the $2.5bn penalty is excessive under marine law and when compared with other federal rulings on punitive damages.
"This record punitive award unquestionably raises important issues of constitutional dimension," said Walter Dellinger, Exxon's lead lawyer on the case."This record punitive award unquestionably raises important issues of constitutional dimension," said Walter Dellinger, Exxon's lead lawyer on the case.
The world's biggest listed oil firm, Exxon added that it had already paid $3.4bn in clean-up costs and other fines related to the oil disaster and damage to the natural environment.The world's biggest listed oil firm, Exxon added that it had already paid $3.4bn in clean-up costs and other fines related to the oil disaster and damage to the natural environment.
But lawyers for the victims dispute the charge that the award is too high and argue that the damages represent "barely more than three weeks of Exxon's net profit".But lawyers for the victims dispute the charge that the award is too high and argue that the damages represent "barely more than three weeks of Exxon's net profit".
In 2006, Exxon reported the highest ever net annual profit for a US business at $39.5bn.In 2006, Exxon reported the highest ever net annual profit for a US business at $39.5bn.
Repeated challengesRepeated challenges
If the ruling is upheld by the Supreme Court the money would be split between 32,000 fishermen, natives, land owners, small businessmen and municipalities in south central Alaska.If the ruling is upheld by the Supreme Court the money would be split between 32,000 fishermen, natives, land owners, small businessmen and municipalities in south central Alaska.
Some of the victims had died while Exxon has repeatedly challenged court verdicts, lawyers said.Some of the victims had died while Exxon has repeatedly challenged court verdicts, lawyers said.
Back in 1994 a jury in Alaska ordered US giant Exxon to pay $5bn in compensation, but the firm successfully appealed the size of the damages. Back in 1994 a jury in Alaska ordered US giant Exxon to pay $5bn in damages, but the firm successfully appealed against the size of the award.
After a number of court cases over the intervening years, this figure was cut by federal judges until a US appeals court set the amount at $2.5bn.After a number of court cases over the intervening years, this figure was cut by federal judges until a US appeals court set the amount at $2.5bn.
The appeal will be go before the Supreme Court next February or March with a ruling expected by the end of June. The appeal will go before the Supreme Court in February or March 2008, with a ruling expected by the end of June.
Exxon shares added 1.5% to $93.61 by close of trade in New York.Exxon shares added 1.5% to $93.61 by close of trade in New York.