This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/scotland/tayside_and_central/7026362.stm
The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Previous version
1
Next version
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
Advice sought over quarry plans | Advice sought over quarry plans |
(about 16 hours later) | |
Stirling Council is to seek legal advice over plans to resume quarrying on a historic piece of land. | |
Permission to quarry the area at Gillies Hill in Cambusbarron was secured by contractors in 1982. | Permission to quarry the area at Gillies Hill in Cambusbarron was secured by contractors in 1982. |
Two companies now want to start work again after a 10-year lull but concerns have been raised by locals. | Two companies now want to start work again after a 10-year lull but concerns have been raised by locals. |
They argue that the site, which played a significant part in the Battle of Bannockburn and is home to endangered animals, would be damaged by the work. | They argue that the site, which played a significant part in the Battle of Bannockburn and is home to endangered animals, would be damaged by the work. |
The local authority is now reviewing the terms of the original planning consent. | The local authority is now reviewing the terms of the original planning consent. |
Tarmac and Hanson Aggregates, now owned by Germany's Heidelberg Cement, put forward proposals to resume quarrying work on the site earlier this year. | Tarmac and Hanson Aggregates, now owned by Germany's Heidelberg Cement, put forward proposals to resume quarrying work on the site earlier this year. |
The news prompted local residents to set up the Save Gillies Hill Campaign group, which has vociferously lobbied for consent for future quarrying to be revoked. | The news prompted local residents to set up the Save Gillies Hill Campaign group, which has vociferously lobbied for consent for future quarrying to be revoked. |
'Important matter' | |
Stirling Council has previously argued that the original decision to grant planning permission could not be reversed. | Stirling Council has previously argued that the original decision to grant planning permission could not be reversed. |
However, during the summer the local authority carried out a review of the planning consent and in particular whether adequate environmental assessments were done in previous years into the impact of future quarrying activity. | |
Campaigners have argued that an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) should have been done but was not. | |
In response to the call, the local authority has now decided to seek legal advice on the matter. | |
A spokeswoman for Stirling Council said: "The review has raised a number of complex issues that will be difficult to resolve, including the need for an Environmental Impact Assessment. | |
"In view of the importance of this matter, it is considered that counsel's opinion is now sought on the issue of whether an EIA is required and what options are available." | "In view of the importance of this matter, it is considered that counsel's opinion is now sought on the issue of whether an EIA is required and what options are available." |
Campaigners hope if it is found an EIA should have been done, it may help prevent future quarrying activity on the site. |
Previous version
1
Next version