This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2013/oct/02/ed-miliband-daily-mail-regulation-william-hague

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Miliband-Daily Mail row will not affect press regulation, says William Hague Daily Mail has demeaned political process, says Heseltine
(about 1 hour later)
The Daily Mail's attack on Ed Miliband's father has no implications for the future regulation of the press in Britain, William Hague has said as he supported the Labour leader's decision to defend his father. The Daily Mail demeaned the political process with its attack on Ralph Miliband, the former deputy prime minister Lord Heseltine has said.
The foreign secretary said it was understandable that the Labour leader had decided to defend his father after the Mail said that Ralph Miliband's Marxist writings showed he hated Britain. In remarks that went further than the careful response of Tory ministers, Heseltine said there was no justification for the headline on the Miliband piece which said he hated Britain.
But Hague declined to say whether the newspaper had carried out a hatchet job as he said: "These things do happen." Heseltine told The Daily Politics on BBC2: "This is carrying politics to an extent that is just demeaning, frankly. The headline isn't justified. It is completely out of context. As everybody knows the guy fought for this country and we now live in a totally different world to the clash between communism and fascism."
The former deputy prime minister addressed the Mail's claim that Marxists such as Ralph Miliband deserve to be condemned because of the repression of the Soviet Union. He said: "Let us be frank. Stalin did some of the most appalling things but the Russians turned the second world war."
Heseltine also said that the Mail had published "hatchet jobs" on Ed Miliband and Nick Clegg.
William Hague had earlier said the Mail's attack has no implications for the future regulation of the press in Britain. The foreign secretary said it was understandable that the Labour leader had decided to defend his father after the Mail said that Ralph Miliband's Marxist writings showed he hated Britain.
Hague declined to say whether the newspaper had carried out a hatchet job as he said: "These things do happen."
Many ministers believe in private that the Mail made a serious error in saying that Ralph Miliband, who fought for Britain in the second world war after escaping the Holocaust, hated the country. But they are declining to criticise the Mail because they do not want to fuel the row, which has overshadowed the past 48 hours of the Conservative conference, ahead of negotiations over the future of press regulation.Many ministers believe in private that the Mail made a serious error in saying that Ralph Miliband, who fought for Britain in the second world war after escaping the Holocaust, hated the country. But they are declining to criticise the Mail because they do not want to fuel the row, which has overshadowed the past 48 hours of the Conservative conference, ahead of negotiations over the future of press regulation.
But a member of the prime minister's No 10 policy board criticised the Mail. Margot James, MP for Stourbridge, tweeted: "Crass and cruel to condemn Ralph M'band for his Marxist views when they were formed in 40/50s, deeply misguided maybe but not unpatriotic."But a member of the prime minister's No 10 policy board criticised the Mail. Margot James, MP for Stourbridge, tweeted: "Crass and cruel to condemn Ralph M'band for his Marxist views when they were formed in 40/50s, deeply misguided maybe but not unpatriotic."
Hague simply supported Ed Miliband's decision to defend his father, though he acknowledged that the Daily Mail's deputy editor, John Steafel, had said the paper had been wrong to run a picture of Ralph Miliband's gravestone with the words: grave socialist.Hague simply supported Ed Miliband's decision to defend his father, though he acknowledged that the Daily Mail's deputy editor, John Steafel, had said the paper had been wrong to run a picture of Ralph Miliband's gravestone with the words: grave socialist.
The foreign secretary told the Today programme on BBC Radio 4: "I think it is very understandable that a son in any walk of life, not just a politician, comes to the defence of a parent. That is what we would expect to happen and that is clearly what is happening here. We should understand and respect that. I am in no position to judge myself about it and he will have known his father far better than the any of us could have possibly have done."The foreign secretary told the Today programme on BBC Radio 4: "I think it is very understandable that a son in any walk of life, not just a politician, comes to the defence of a parent. That is what we would expect to happen and that is clearly what is happening here. We should understand and respect that. I am in no position to judge myself about it and he will have known his father far better than the any of us could have possibly have done."
Asked whether the Mail had carried out a hatchet job on Ralph Miliband, Hague said: "I am going to leave that for the leader of the opposition and the Daily Mail to argue about. I notice that they have said it was an error of judgment to use a picture of the grave in the way that they did. But I think that is best left to them.Asked whether the Mail had carried out a hatchet job on Ralph Miliband, Hague said: "I am going to leave that for the leader of the opposition and the Daily Mail to argue about. I notice that they have said it was an error of judgment to use a picture of the grave in the way that they did. But I think that is best left to them.
"I don't think we can jump to wider conclusions about the regulation of the press or the wider political argument. These things do happen – arguments between politicians – and I know them well. It is understandable that someone comes to the defence of their parents.""I don't think we can jump to wider conclusions about the regulation of the press or the wider political argument. These things do happen – arguments between politicians – and I know them well. It is understandable that someone comes to the defence of their parents."
The London mayor, Boris Johnson, told LBC 97.3 he understood Ed Miliband's reaction. "What I actually feel, I've got ancestry that doesn't come from this country and I think people do feel very sensitive, particularly if the patriotism of those relatives is impugned," he said.
"I can imagine that being a very, very hurtful thing and I would definitely want to fire back if it was me."
Downing Street is working hard to ensure that ministers keep out of the Labour row with the Mail. Ministers have been told to make a simple argument that any child would rightly want to defend a parent.Downing Street is working hard to ensure that ministers keep out of the Labour row with the Mail. Ministers have been told to make a simple argument that any child would rightly want to defend a parent.
David Cameron said in his interview on the Today programme on Tuesday, which took place at 8.10am, that he had not read the Daily Mail piece. He said the same thing three hours later in separate interviews with the main television news programmes. By early afternoon, by which time he would be facing no more interviews until after the conference, Tory sources let it be known that the prime minister had read the Mail article.David Cameron said in his interview on the Today programme on Tuesday, which took place at 8.10am, that he had not read the Daily Mail piece. He said the same thing three hours later in separate interviews with the main television news programmes. By early afternoon, by which time he would be facing no more interviews until after the conference, Tory sources let it be known that the prime minister had read the Mail article.
Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning.Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning.