This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/oct/01/nurse-whistleblower-facebook-poor-care

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Nurse who used Facebook to blow the whistle about poor care escapes being struck off Nurse who used Facebook to blow the whistle about poor care escapes being struck off
(about 5 hours later)
A nurse who used Facebook to raise concerns about standards at the hospital where he worked has escaped being struck off after a disciplinary panel acknowledged he was passionate about his job and capable. A nurse who used Facebook to raise concerns about standards at his hospital has escaped being struck off after a disciplinary panel acknowledged he was passionate about his job and capable.
Colin Toseland complained on the social networking site about the state of wards, surgical theatres and the level of support offered to nursing staff. Colin Toseland complained on the social networking site about the state of wards, surgical theatres and the level of support offered to nursing staff. Toseland had earlier written an article in Nursing Times exposing the stresses he and other medical workers were under.
Toseland had earlier written a warts-and-all article in Nursing Times exposing the stresses he and other medical workers were under. At a Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) fitness to practise hearing, a panel said he overstepped the mark with his Facebook comments and should have used other mechanisms to raise his concerns.
At a Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) fitness to practise hearing, a panel said he had overstepped the mark with his Facebook comments and he should have used other mechanisms to raise his concerns.
The panel could have struck him off or suspended him but decided that a formal caution was sufficient as a penalty.The panel could have struck him off or suspended him but decided that a formal caution was sufficient as a penalty.
Tessa King, the panel's chairwoman, said: "The purpose of sanctions is not to be punitive, but to maintain high standards and public confidence in the nursing profession.Tessa King, the panel's chairwoman, said: "The purpose of sanctions is not to be punitive, but to maintain high standards and public confidence in the nursing profession.
"Taking no action would have been inappropriate given the registrant's mistakes were deliberate and repeated."Taking no action would have been inappropriate given the registrant's mistakes were deliberate and repeated.
"However, a caution order is sufficient. While his remarks had the potential for public harm there was no evidence any actual harm taking place."However, a caution order is sufficient. While his remarks had the potential for public harm there was no evidence any actual harm taking place.
"Mr Toseland has a passion for the nursing profession, and clinically he is very good at his job, but on these occasions he overstepped the mark.""Mr Toseland has a passion for the nursing profession, and clinically he is very good at his job, but on these occasions he overstepped the mark."
Miranda Stotesbury, the case presenter, said the NMC had clear guidelines on whistleblowing – and that Facebook was not an appropriate way of raising concerns.Miranda Stotesbury, the case presenter, said the NMC had clear guidelines on whistleblowing – and that Facebook was not an appropriate way of raising concerns.
She said: "The issue of whistleblowing has been well-documented in the media but there were plenty of mechanisms in place for the registrant to raise any concerns he had. She said: "The issue of whistleblowing has been well-documented in the media but there were plenty of mechanisms in place for the registrant to raise any concerns he had.
"As a senior nurse he would have known this. He did not escalate his concerns through the proper and appropriate channels. By not raising his concerns in the proper way the registrant has damaged the reputation of the profession.""As a senior nurse he would have known this. He did not escalate his concerns through the proper and appropriate channels. By not raising his concerns in the proper way the registrant has damaged the reputation of the profession."
Toseland was not present at the hearing in Cardiff, although he had previously written to the panel expressing regret about his online posts. A previous panel took no action over his Nursing Times article.Toseland was not present at the hearing in Cardiff, although he had previously written to the panel expressing regret about his online posts. A previous panel took no action over his Nursing Times article.
He made his comments about the Ysbyty Glan Clwyd Hospital, Denbighshire, north Wales. He made his comments about the Glan Clwyd hospital, Denbighshire, north Wales.
Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning.Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning.