This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-beds-bucks-herts-24156511

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Man told to demolish home after building "inappropriate" extension Barton-Le-Clay house with 'inappropriate extension' must go
(about 7 hours later)
A man could be forced to tear down his seven-bedroom home after he built an "inappropriate" extension. A man is told he must demolish his seven-bedroom home after he built an "inappropriate" extension.
Syeed Raza Shah was given planning permission to increase the floor space of his house in Barton-Le-Clay, Bedfordshire, by about 45% in 2011.Syeed Raza Shah was given planning permission to increase the floor space of his house in Barton-Le-Clay, Bedfordshire, by about 45% in 2011.
But Central Bedfordshire Council says the work equated to more like a 200% increase and has refused retrospective planning permission.But Central Bedfordshire Council says the work equated to more like a 200% increase and has refused retrospective planning permission.
Mr Shah said he would appeal against the decision to demolish the house.Mr Shah said he would appeal against the decision to demolish the house.
The five-bedroom bungalow cost £750,000 in 2008, when Mr Shah said it looked an "eyesore".The five-bedroom bungalow cost £750,000 in 2008, when Mr Shah said it looked an "eyesore".
Soon after he started work on an extension, as agreed by local planners. He would not say how much the work cost.Soon after he started work on an extension, as agreed by local planners. He would not say how much the work cost.
'New building''New building'
"I have kept within the parameters, I haven't increased on length or width of the house," Mr Shah said."I have kept within the parameters, I haven't increased on length or width of the house," Mr Shah said.
"Yes, we have made some minor adjustments, but I don't see the decision that has been made justifies demolishing the house."Yes, we have made some minor adjustments, but I don't see the decision that has been made justifies demolishing the house.
"The house would always look different, it was a flat roof bungalow, a dilapidated building.""The house would always look different, it was a flat roof bungalow, a dilapidated building."
Mr Shah also said the council's claim that he had increased the floor space by 200% was "absolutely absurd".Mr Shah also said the council's claim that he had increased the floor space by 200% was "absolutely absurd".
"If anything I have exceeded [the original plan] by about 20%," he said."If anything I have exceeded [the original plan] by about 20%," he said.
The council said the alterations amounted to a new building and served Mr Shah with an enforcement order.The council said the alterations amounted to a new building and served Mr Shah with an enforcement order.
It said retrospective planning permission could not be granted as the house is in an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty.It said retrospective planning permission could not be granted as the house is in an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty.
Councillor Nigel Young said the council had been working with Mr Shah for a "considerable amount of time" to try and have him stick to the original planning permission.Councillor Nigel Young said the council had been working with Mr Shah for a "considerable amount of time" to try and have him stick to the original planning permission.
"We told Mr Shah during construction that [the new building] was inappropriate," he said."We told Mr Shah during construction that [the new building] was inappropriate," he said.
"Councils must follow planning law and planning regulation, this is well outside planning regulation."Councils must follow planning law and planning regulation, this is well outside planning regulation.
"We're obliged, as we are in all cases of unlawful development, to act on behalf of all of our residents and issue enforcement notices.""We're obliged, as we are in all cases of unlawful development, to act on behalf of all of our residents and issue enforcement notices."
There have been 11 formal complaints from neighbours, Mr Young said.There have been 11 formal complaints from neighbours, Mr Young said.