This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/13/act-to-legalise-same-sex-marriage

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Australian Capital Territory to legalise same-sex marriage by end of year Australian Capital Territory to legalise same-sex marriage by end of year
(5 days later)
The Australian Capital Territory government is set to legalise same-sex marriage by the end of the year and chief minister Katy Gallagher told Guardian Australia that she doesn’t expect the federal Coalition government to overturn the legislation.The Australian Capital Territory government is set to legalise same-sex marriage by the end of the year and chief minister Katy Gallagher told Guardian Australia that she doesn’t expect the federal Coalition government to overturn the legislation.
The Labor administration of the territory will put forward a bill that will enable gay marriage, following a decade-long attempt to legislate in the area.The Labor administration of the territory will put forward a bill that will enable gay marriage, following a decade-long attempt to legislate in the area.
Seven years ago, the John Howard-led government used its federal powers to overturn an ACT move to allow same-sex civil unions. The ACT has since reinstated civil unions.Seven years ago, the John Howard-led government used its federal powers to overturn an ACT move to allow same-sex civil unions. The ACT has since reinstated civil unions.
The legislation is set to be an early test for the prime minister elect, Tony Abbott, who has consistently opposed same-sex marriage but has held out the prospect of a vote on the issue at some time in the future.The legislation is set to be an early test for the prime minister elect, Tony Abbott, who has consistently opposed same-sex marriage but has held out the prospect of a vote on the issue at some time in the future.
Gallagher told Guardian Australia that she didn’t expect the Coalition to intervene to prevent gay marriage in the ACT.Gallagher told Guardian Australia that she didn’t expect the Coalition to intervene to prevent gay marriage in the ACT.
“We’ve been pretty clear on this issue for some time now and there’s overwhelming community support for this,” she said.“We’ve been pretty clear on this issue for some time now and there’s overwhelming community support for this,” she said.
“Any intervention won’t be easy and we certainly don’t want to be the first test of the new Senate. I think opposition to this has softened within politics in acknowledgment of the fact that the community has shifted its view in favour.“Any intervention won’t be easy and we certainly don’t want to be the first test of the new Senate. I think opposition to this has softened within politics in acknowledgment of the fact that the community has shifted its view in favour.
“This issue has had a chequered history in the ACT. We had to deal with the Howard government’s opposition and then craft something that prime minister Rudd could live with, due to his opposition. But if this passes the assembly, I see no reason why it won’t be law by the end of the year.”“This issue has had a chequered history in the ACT. We had to deal with the Howard government’s opposition and then craft something that prime minister Rudd could live with, due to his opposition. But if this passes the assembly, I see no reason why it won’t be law by the end of the year.”
The federal government’s power over the territories has changed since Howard used his executive veto. A repeal of ACT marriage equality would have to pass both houses of the federal parliament, presenting a potentially tricky challenge for the Abbott government.The federal government’s power over the territories has changed since Howard used his executive veto. A repeal of ACT marriage equality would have to pass both houses of the federal parliament, presenting a potentially tricky challenge for the Abbott government.
Gallagher said that she expected the ACT’s stance on marriage equality to be replicated across Australia.Gallagher said that she expected the ACT’s stance on marriage equality to be replicated across Australia.
“I can see Tasmania is making a good effort in this area but we will be the first,” she said. “I would expect that something will be put to the federal parliament in this term. The Labor party has led this debate nationally and I expect more and more people to support it. We have waited long enough for this.”“I can see Tasmania is making a good effort in this area but we will be the first,” she said. “I would expect that something will be put to the federal parliament in this term. The Labor party has led this debate nationally and I expect more and more people to support it. We have waited long enough for this.”
On Thursday, the Australian Christian Lobby urged federal Labor not to introduce a private member’s bill to legalise same-sex marriage.On Thursday, the Australian Christian Lobby urged federal Labor not to introduce a private member’s bill to legalise same-sex marriage.
“Any analysis of [the] election must take into account that this issue was front and centre of Labor’s campaign but failed to attract votes amongst the broader Australian community,” said Lyle Shelton, managing director of the ACL.“Any analysis of [the] election must take into account that this issue was front and centre of Labor’s campaign but failed to attract votes amongst the broader Australian community,” said Lyle Shelton, managing director of the ACL.
“Mr Rudd’s bullying of Christian pastor Matt Prater on Q&A [in the week before the election] has caused many people to worry about freedom of speech and freedom of belief should the law on marriage be changed.“Mr Rudd’s bullying of Christian pastor Matt Prater on Q&A [in the week before the election] has caused many people to worry about freedom of speech and freedom of belief should the law on marriage be changed.
“There are many Australians who for reasons of conscience will always believe that marriage is between a man and a woman and will want to teach their children this.“There are many Australians who for reasons of conscience will always believe that marriage is between a man and a woman and will want to teach their children this.
“Mr Rudd’s tone suggested that there was no place in Australia for these beliefs. The far-reaching consequences of changing the definition of marriage mean a conscience vote of the Australian people, not politicians, is what is needed.”“Mr Rudd’s tone suggested that there was no place in Australia for these beliefs. The far-reaching consequences of changing the definition of marriage mean a conscience vote of the Australian people, not politicians, is what is needed.”
Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning.Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning.
Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning. Enter your email address to subscribe.
Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox every weekday.