This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2013/sep/03/andrew-lansley-lobbying-bill-criticism

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Andrew Lansley hints at concessions as MPs criticise 'sinister' lobbying bill Andrew Lansley hints at concessions as MPs criticise 'sinister' lobbying bill
(14 days later)
Andrew Lansley, the leader of the house, hinted at a partial retreat over new anti-lobbying laws as MPs condemned what they described as a "sinister" attempt to gag charities.Andrew Lansley, the leader of the house, hinted at a partial retreat over new anti-lobbying laws as MPs condemned what they described as a "sinister" attempt to gag charities.
MPs variously described the proposed laws as a "dog's breakfast" and a "mess" over concerns that it could stop charities taking part in national debate in the year before an election. They also said it could prevent MPs from lobbying ministers about national issues such as fracking or HS2.MPs variously described the proposed laws as a "dog's breakfast" and a "mess" over concerns that it could stop charities taking part in national debate in the year before an election. They also said it could prevent MPs from lobbying ministers about national issues such as fracking or HS2.
In a fiery debate, Lansley was accused of having his fingerprints on another piece of "badly-drafted" legislation – two years after he faced similar criticisms over the controversial health reforms.In a fiery debate, Lansley was accused of having his fingerprints on another piece of "badly-drafted" legislation – two years after he faced similar criticisms over the controversial health reforms.
Lansley insisted there was no need for alarm over the bill, but hinted there could be a climbdown on some parts of its wording. "If there is any doubt about whether MPs might in any form, in relation to their activities in this house, be included or compromised in relation to this, we will put a specific provision into the bill to make sure that this doesn't happen," he said.Lansley insisted there was no need for alarm over the bill, but hinted there could be a climbdown on some parts of its wording. "If there is any doubt about whether MPs might in any form, in relation to their activities in this house, be included or compromised in relation to this, we will put a specific provision into the bill to make sure that this doesn't happen," he said.
Whitehall sources also suggested the government could be open to changes. "We've always said we're happy to listen, we've always said what's important is making sure we've got a system that works," one said.Whitehall sources also suggested the government could be open to changes. "We've always said we're happy to listen, we've always said what's important is making sure we've got a system that works," one said.
However, Lansley appeared unwilling to move over new restrictions on election campaigning, saying they were necessary to stop vested interests distorting results. Under the new laws third parties will be able to spend £390,000 on campaigning, rather than the current limit of £989,000, in the year before an election. On top of this, the bill widens the definition of what counts as political campaigning to anything that would influence a result, regardless of its purpose. Items such as staff costs, advertising, and rallies will also be included in regulated campaign expenditure for the first time.However, Lansley appeared unwilling to move over new restrictions on election campaigning, saying they were necessary to stop vested interests distorting results. Under the new laws third parties will be able to spend £390,000 on campaigning, rather than the current limit of £989,000, in the year before an election. On top of this, the bill widens the definition of what counts as political campaigning to anything that would influence a result, regardless of its purpose. Items such as staff costs, advertising, and rallies will also be included in regulated campaign expenditure for the first time.
Lansley said: "All the bill does, which is the right thing to do, is to make sure that the limit is a more appropriate limit for the future and doesn't allow those third parties to engage in distorting activity in relation to elections."Lansley said: "All the bill does, which is the right thing to do, is to make sure that the limit is a more appropriate limit for the future and doesn't allow those third parties to engage in distorting activity in relation to elections."
Angela Eagle, Labour's shadow leader of the house, branded the bill "inadequate, sinister and partisan", describing it as "one of the worst pieces of legislation I've seen any government produce in a very long time".Angela Eagle, Labour's shadow leader of the house, branded the bill "inadequate, sinister and partisan", describing it as "one of the worst pieces of legislation I've seen any government produce in a very long time".
The former Conservative minister David Davis said the bill appeared to have been drawn up in excessive haste, while Tracey Crouch, Tory MP for Chatham and Aylesford, asked for an explanation of "how or why this bill will not gag charities as many would fear".The former Conservative minister David Davis said the bill appeared to have been drawn up in excessive haste, while Tracey Crouch, Tory MP for Chatham and Aylesford, asked for an explanation of "how or why this bill will not gag charities as many would fear".
However, others agreed with its aims of restricting lobbying by campaign groups, with Tory MP Jacob Rees-Mogg calling it "an excellent, measured, balanced bill".However, others agreed with its aims of restricting lobbying by campaign groups, with Tory MP Jacob Rees-Mogg calling it "an excellent, measured, balanced bill".
The Electoral Commission warned the new spending limits could mean it would have to ask groups in breach of the law to take down blogs or stop political rallies. The watchdog said the bill would create a high degree of uncertainty.The Electoral Commission warned the new spending limits could mean it would have to ask groups in breach of the law to take down blogs or stop political rallies. The watchdog said the bill would create a high degree of uncertainty.
Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning.