This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/27/world/middleeast/syria-assad.html

The article has changed 25 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Assad Warns U.S. Against Military Intervention, Reports Say Assad Warns U.S. Against Military Intervention, Reports Say
(35 minutes later)
LONDON — As United Nations inspectors prepared on Monday to examine the site of a claimed chemical attack in Syria, President Bashar al-Assad was quoted as denying that his forces used poison gas against his own citizens, while divisions between outside powers over how to handle the crisis seemed showed no signs of easing. LONDON — As United Nations inspectors headed Monday toward the site of a claimed chemical attack in Syria, President Bashar al-Assad was quoted as denying that his forces used poison gas against his own citizens, while divisions between outside powers over how to handle the crisis showed no signs of easing.
In an interview with the Russian newspaper Izvestia, Mr. Assad said accusations that his forces used chemical weapons were illogical and an “insult to common sense,” news reports said. He warned the United States that military intervention in his country would bring “failure just like in all the previous wars they waged, starting with Vietnam and up to our days.” In an interview with the Russian newspaper Izvestia, Mr. Assad said accusations that his forces used chemical weapons were illogical and an “insult to common sense,” warning the United States that military intervention in his country would bring “failure just like in all the previous wars they waged, starting with Vietnam and up to our days.”
Mr. Assad’s choice of a Russian newspaper to air his views seemed to reflect Moscow’s strong support for the Syrian leader after last week’s attack on the outskirts of Damascus, which claimed hundreds of lives. News agencies reported that the United Nations inspectors had left central Damascus and were apparently traveling to the area on Monday in a convoy of six or seven vehicles escorted by Syrian security forces. Mr. Assad’s choice of a Russian newspaper to air his views seemed to reflect Moscow’s strong support for the Syrian leader after last week’s attack on the outskirts of Damascus, which claimed hundreds of lives. News agencies reported that the United Nations inspectors had left central Damascus and were traveling to the area on Monday in a convoy of six or seven vehicles escorted by Syrian security forces.
On Sunday, a spokesman for Russia’s Foreign Ministry, Aleksandr K. Lukashevich, said that those who advocated an armed response to any chemical weapons attack — without citing the United States or other countries — were prejudging the results of the United Nations inspections.On Sunday, a spokesman for Russia’s Foreign Ministry, Aleksandr K. Lukashevich, said that those who advocated an armed response to any chemical weapons attack — without citing the United States or other countries — were prejudging the results of the United Nations inspections.
“In these conditions, we again resolutely call on all those who are trying to impose the results of the U.N. investigations and who say that armed actions against Syria is possible to show common sense and avoid tragic mistakes,” Mr. Lukashevich said in a statement released on the ministry’s Web site.“In these conditions, we again resolutely call on all those who are trying to impose the results of the U.N. investigations and who say that armed actions against Syria is possible to show common sense and avoid tragic mistakes,” Mr. Lukashevich said in a statement released on the ministry’s Web site.
While Mr. Assad has reportedly given weapons inspectors access to the site of the attack, his gesture has been greeted with widespread skepticism in the West, with critics saying that the offer came too late for inspectors to make an accurate assessment of what happened. While Mr. Assad has given weapons inspectors access to the site, his gesture has been greeted with widespread skepticism in the West, with critics saying that the offer came too late for inspectors to make an accurate assessment of what happened. British Foreign Secretary William Hague complained on Monday, moreover, that access was not “unimpeded” since it was limited to a “certain number of hours.”
In an interview Monday with Europe 1, a French radio station, Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius of France , said “all options” were still open, but “the only option I do not envisage is to do nothing.” France has been a close ally of the rebels seeking Mr. Assad’s ouster in the country’s civil war. In an interview Monday with Europe 1, a French radio station, Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius of France, said “all options” were still open in devizing an international response, but “the only option I do not envisage is to do nothing.” France has been a close ally of the rebels seeking Mr. Assad’s ouster in the country’s civil war.
Mr. Fabius said there was no doubt that chemical weapons had been used and outside powers would negotiate a “proportionate response” in the “days to come.”Mr. Fabius said there was no doubt that chemical weapons had been used and outside powers would negotiate a “proportionate response” in the “days to come.”
In the welter of diplomatic maneuvering, Turkey, which also a strong supporter of the rebels, said it would join an international coalition against Mr. Assad if the United Nations Security Council could not reach a consensus, Reuters reported, quoting Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu in an interview with the Milliyet newspaper. In the welter of diplomatic maneuvering, Turkey, also a strong supporter of the rebels, said it would join an international coalition against Mr. Assad if the United Nations Security Council could not reach a consensus, Reuters reported, quoting Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu in an interview with the Milliyet newspaper.
In London, Foreign Secretary William Hague of Britain told the BBC: “Is it possible to respond to chemical weapons without complete unity on the U.N. Security Council? I would argue yes it is, otherwise it might be impossible to respond to such outrages, such crimes, and I don’t think that’s an acceptable situation.” In London, Foreign Secretary Hague took a similar approach an international response. “Is it possible to respond to chemical weapons without complete unity on the U.N. Security Council?" he told the BBC in a radio interview. “I would argue yes it is, otherwise it might be impossible to respond to such outrages, such crimes, and I don’t think that’s an acceptable situation.”
In the interview with Izvestia, Mr. Assad was quoted as saying, “America has taken part in many wars but could not once achieve its political goals for which the wars were started. Yes, it is true, the great powers can wage wars but can they win them?” In the interview with Izvestia, Mr. Assad said, “America has taken part in many wars but could not once achieve its political goals for which the wars were started. Yes, it is true, the great powers can wage wars but can they win them?”
He said government troops would have risked killing their own forces if they had used chemical weapons. “This contradicts elementary logic,” news reports quoted him as saying. It is “not us but our enemies who are using chemical weapons,” he said, referring to antigovernment rebels as “the terrorists.”He said government troops would have risked killing their own forces if they had used chemical weapons. “This contradicts elementary logic,” news reports quoted him as saying. It is “not us but our enemies who are using chemical weapons,” he said, referring to antigovernment rebels as “the terrorists.”
For his part, President Obama has not decided to take action, officials in Washington said on Sunday. But, moving a step closer to possible American military involvement in Syria, a senior Obama administration official said that there was “very little doubt” that Mr. Assad’s military forces had used chemical weapons against civilians and that a Syrian promise to allow United Nations inspectors access to the site was “too late to be credible.”For his part, President Obama has not decided to take action, officials in Washington said on Sunday. But, moving a step closer to possible American military involvement in Syria, a senior Obama administration official said that there was “very little doubt” that Mr. Assad’s military forces had used chemical weapons against civilians and that a Syrian promise to allow United Nations inspectors access to the site was “too late to be credible.”