This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/01/world/asia/civilian-casualties-in-afghanistan-rise-23-percent.html
The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 1 | Version 2 |
|---|---|
| Civilian Casualties in Afghanistan Rise as U.S. Prepares Pullout | |
| (about 1 hour later) | |
| KABUL, Afghanistan — The number of civilians killed or injured in Afghanistan rose by 23 percent in the first six months of 2013, according to a United Nations report on civilian casualties, reversing a decline last year and signaling the challenge Afghan forces face as they take over all combat duties from American soldiers. | |
| The Taliban continued to cause the majority of casualties as it stepped up attacks this year through the indiscriminate use of roadside bombs and suicide attacks in major population centers, according to the report, released on Wednesday by the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan. | |
| With the American pullout planned for the end of 2014, responsibility for the fighting is increasingly falling to the Afghans. Aware of the security transition in place, the insurgency has stepped up its efforts to strike the Afghan forces, hoping to undermine confidence in the government institutions. That effort has included a focus on complex and daring attacks in major cities like Kabul, where Afghans often find themselves in harm’s way. | |
| In many areas where the international soldiers have shut down bases or reduced their footprint, the fight for control between the Afghan forces and the insurgency has intensified — with women and children often bearing the brunt of the violence. Fighting between the two groups over the abandoned swaths of the country was the second biggest cause of civilian deaths and injuries. | In many areas where the international soldiers have shut down bases or reduced their footprint, the fight for control between the Afghan forces and the insurgency has intensified — with women and children often bearing the brunt of the violence. Fighting between the two groups over the abandoned swaths of the country was the second biggest cause of civilian deaths and injuries. |
| From January to June, the number of civilians killed in war-related violence rose to 1,319 from 1,158 a year earlier. In the same period, 2,533 civilians were injured, compared with 1,976 in 2012. | From January to June, the number of civilians killed in war-related violence rose to 1,319 from 1,158 a year earlier. In the same period, 2,533 civilians were injured, compared with 1,976 in 2012. |
| Throughout the first half of the year, reports of women and children being killed by roadside bombs seemed at times an almost daily occurrence, particularly in the south Afghanistan, where the so-called improvised explosive devices have been sown through much of the terrain by antigovernment forces. The United Nations report found that improvised explosive devices accounted for more than a third of the civilian casualties in the first half of 2013, helping drive a 30 percent increase in injuries and deaths of children. | |
| Meanwhile, the intensifying ground battles helped propel a 60 percent jump in casualties among women. | Meanwhile, the intensifying ground battles helped propel a 60 percent jump in casualties among women. |
| The Taliban has been under pressure in recent years to reduce civilian casualties. The group’s leaders have issued edicts demanding more caution from fighters and have set up a committee to prevent the loss of innocent lives. And yet the data from the United Nations reflect a trend heading in the opposite direction. | The Taliban has been under pressure in recent years to reduce civilian casualties. The group’s leaders have issued edicts demanding more caution from fighters and have set up a committee to prevent the loss of innocent lives. And yet the data from the United Nations reflect a trend heading in the opposite direction. |
| “Unfortunately the reality has not been borne out and we have not seen a great reduction in civilian casualties by them,” said Georgette Gagnon, the United Nations director of human rights for Afghanistan. | “Unfortunately the reality has not been borne out and we have not seen a great reduction in civilian casualties by them,” said Georgette Gagnon, the United Nations director of human rights for Afghanistan. |
| The Taliban, for its part, rejected the report as little more than a tool of the American strategy. In addition to decrying the coalition’s responsibility for innocent Afghan deaths, the group took issue with what it viewed as the U.N.'s use of the word civilian to describe government employees, like judicial workers. | The Taliban, for its part, rejected the report as little more than a tool of the American strategy. In addition to decrying the coalition’s responsibility for innocent Afghan deaths, the group took issue with what it viewed as the U.N.'s use of the word civilian to describe government employees, like judicial workers. |
| “Calling them civilians is Unama’s own judgment,” according to the statement. “We don’t consider people civilians who are directly involved in our country’s occupation.” | |
| But there is little doubt the numbers will put greater pressure on the Taliban, from communities and its own ranks, to reduce the carnage among civilians. | But there is little doubt the numbers will put greater pressure on the Taliban, from communities and its own ranks, to reduce the carnage among civilians. |
| In the last several months, the Taliban have condemned attacks that killed civilians, blaming the Afghan and coalition troops for using excessive force. In May, the group denied responsibility for — and condemned — an attack in Jalalabad on the International Committee of the Red Cross, an organization it sees as impartial. | In the last several months, the Taliban have condemned attacks that killed civilians, blaming the Afghan and coalition troops for using excessive force. In May, the group denied responsibility for — and condemned — an attack in Jalalabad on the International Committee of the Red Cross, an organization it sees as impartial. |
| Another hallmark of the transition as the Americans end their combat role is the rising percentage of civilian casualties caused by the Afghan security forces. Though the number of deaths caused by all pro-government forces, including NATO soldiers, is lower than last year, civilian casualties caused by the Afghan forces jumped substantially, the report showed. That could be a worrisome trend as the Afghan forces take a greater role in security operations going forward. | Another hallmark of the transition as the Americans end their combat role is the rising percentage of civilian casualties caused by the Afghan security forces. Though the number of deaths caused by all pro-government forces, including NATO soldiers, is lower than last year, civilian casualties caused by the Afghan forces jumped substantially, the report showed. That could be a worrisome trend as the Afghan forces take a greater role in security operations going forward. |