This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/jonathanjonesblog/2013/jul/29/nypd-censorship-park-avenue-art-project

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
NYPD attempts to censor anticipated Park Avenue art project NYPD attempts to censor anticipated Park Avenue art project
(about 2 months later)
How free should free speech be? This question currently bedevils the internet, as misogynist comments, even rape threats, pollute Twitter. Yet a work of art about to go public in New York praises complete liberty of expression.How free should free speech be? This question currently bedevils the internet, as misogynist comments, even rape threats, pollute Twitter. Yet a work of art about to go public in New York praises complete liberty of expression.
Rafael Lozano-Hemmer is turning the Park Avenue tunnel in New York into a reverberating sound and light installation that celebrates free speech. From 3 to 17 August, this tunnel will be closed to traffic and open to visitors for Voice Tunnel, part of New York's Summer Streets festival. You walk into the middle of the tunnel, where a silver intercom awaits your remarks. Speak a short message and it will pulse through the tunnel in waves of sound and light.Rafael Lozano-Hemmer is turning the Park Avenue tunnel in New York into a reverberating sound and light installation that celebrates free speech. From 3 to 17 August, this tunnel will be closed to traffic and open to visitors for Voice Tunnel, part of New York's Summer Streets festival. You walk into the middle of the tunnel, where a silver intercom awaits your remarks. Speak a short message and it will pulse through the tunnel in waves of sound and light.
If you've ever sat in a cinema in Manhattan and enjoyed the continual stream of jokes and comments with which New Yorkers give a film instant feedback, it's easy to imagine some salty, witty and creative words shaking the Park Avenue tunnel. In fact, the New York Police Department had serious anxieties about what kind of words might be spoken. The NYPD asked the artist to install a time delay so messages could be regulated. Lozano-Hemmer refused, telling the New York Times: "This is the place for people to express their views. That's what this project is about. And if you want to censor it – I've never in my life censored a work, and I won't do it."If you've ever sat in a cinema in Manhattan and enjoyed the continual stream of jokes and comments with which New Yorkers give a film instant feedback, it's easy to imagine some salty, witty and creative words shaking the Park Avenue tunnel. In fact, the New York Police Department had serious anxieties about what kind of words might be spoken. The NYPD asked the artist to install a time delay so messages could be regulated. Lozano-Hemmer refused, telling the New York Times: "This is the place for people to express their views. That's what this project is about. And if you want to censor it – I've never in my life censored a work, and I won't do it."
I'm sure the free speech that echoes through the tunnel will be vivid, but it is unlikely anything the police department will need to fret about. For one thing, New Yorkers seem to say what they want where they want – it's unlikely anyone will walk into the centre of a tunnel just to say the unsayable. And the art audience that gathers will likely create its own civil context.I'm sure the free speech that echoes through the tunnel will be vivid, but it is unlikely anything the police department will need to fret about. For one thing, New Yorkers seem to say what they want where they want – it's unlikely anyone will walk into the centre of a tunnel just to say the unsayable. And the art audience that gathers will likely create its own civil context.
Ideally, free speech is supposed to regulate itself. In a healthy public space, people can argue, debate, joke and even criticise each other without the air turning thick with threat. Call this politeness, call it civilisation, call it a necessary veneer of hypocrisy – we need it and when it breaks down, things get ugly.Ideally, free speech is supposed to regulate itself. In a healthy public space, people can argue, debate, joke and even criticise each other without the air turning thick with threat. Call this politeness, call it civilisation, call it a necessary veneer of hypocrisy – we need it and when it breaks down, things get ugly.
The other night, I took a train from Edinburgh to London. At York, a group of noisy, boozed-up people got on and sat behind me. After a while a man pointed out this was the "Quiet Coach". The York group responded furiously to his complaint. A woman supported him, again stressing that they were in the Quiet Coach. What happened next was hideous.The other night, I took a train from Edinburgh to London. At York, a group of noisy, boozed-up people got on and sat behind me. After a while a man pointed out this was the "Quiet Coach". The York group responded furiously to his complaint. A woman supported him, again stressing that they were in the Quiet Coach. What happened next was hideous.
Several men in the party of drinking companions rounded viciously on the woman, insulting her, deconstructing what they imagined to be her personality and, in short, subjecting her to sustained misogynist remarks.Several men in the party of drinking companions rounded viciously on the woman, insulting her, deconstructing what they imagined to be her personality and, in short, subjecting her to sustained misogynist remarks.
Such verbal attacks do not only happen online – they can happen face-to-face in a railway carriage. After telling these men what I thought of them, I found the station guard, who had to threaten to involve the police just to modulate the tone of the "conversation".Such verbal attacks do not only happen online – they can happen face-to-face in a railway carriage. After telling these men what I thought of them, I found the station guard, who had to threaten to involve the police just to modulate the tone of the "conversation".
This explosion revealed how free speech can be noxious, after all.This explosion revealed how free speech can be noxious, after all.
Raphael Lozano-Hemmer is right to glorify the human voice. But without civility the loudest and most aggressive voices win.Raphael Lozano-Hemmer is right to glorify the human voice. But without civility the loudest and most aggressive voices win.
Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning.