This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.guardian.co.uk/global-development/poverty-matters/2013/jul/10/china-development-banks-environment

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
China's development banks need to clean up their act China's development banks need to clean up their act
(2 months later)
China is redefining the global development agenda. While the west preaches trade liberalisation and financial deregulation, China orchestrates massive infrastructure and industrial policies under regulated trade and financial markets. China transformed its economy and brought more than 600 million people out of poverty. Western policies led to financial crises, slow growth and relatively less poverty alleviation across the globe.China is redefining the global development agenda. While the west preaches trade liberalisation and financial deregulation, China orchestrates massive infrastructure and industrial policies under regulated trade and financial markets. China transformed its economy and brought more than 600 million people out of poverty. Western policies led to financial crises, slow growth and relatively less poverty alleviation across the globe.
China is now exporting its model across the world. The China Development Bank (CDB) and the Export-Import Bank of China (EIBC) now provide more financing to developing countries than the World Bank does. What is more, China's finance doesn't come with the harsh conditions – such as trade liberalisation and fiscal austerity – that western-backed finance has. China's development banks are not only doing good across the world, they are helping China's bottom line as they make a strong profit and often provide opportunities for Chinese firms.China is now exporting its model across the world. The China Development Bank (CDB) and the Export-Import Bank of China (EIBC) now provide more financing to developing countries than the World Bank does. What is more, China's finance doesn't come with the harsh conditions – such as trade liberalisation and fiscal austerity – that western-backed finance has. China's development banks are not only doing good across the world, they are helping China's bottom line as they make a strong profit and often provide opportunities for Chinese firms.
However, China's global stride may be jeopardised unless it begins to incorporate environmental and social safeguards into its overseas operations. In a policy memorandum (pdf) for the Paulson Institute, I note how there is a growing backlash against China's development banks on these grounds. By remedying these concerns China can become the global leader in development finance.However, China's global stride may be jeopardised unless it begins to incorporate environmental and social safeguards into its overseas operations. In a policy memorandum (pdf) for the Paulson Institute, I note how there is a growing backlash against China's development banks on these grounds. By remedying these concerns China can become the global leader in development finance.
There are a growing number of cases where Chinese financial institutions may be losing ground over social and environmental concerns. The Belinga iron ore deposit in Gabon was contracted in 2007 between the government in Libreville and the China Machinery Energy Corporation, with financing from EIBC. The project sparked significant local protest over its environmental impact, and, as a result, has been perpetually renegotiated and delayed, and may ultimately be denied.There are a growing number of cases where Chinese financial institutions may be losing ground over social and environmental concerns. The Belinga iron ore deposit in Gabon was contracted in 2007 between the government in Libreville and the China Machinery Energy Corporation, with financing from EIBC. The project sparked significant local protest over its environmental impact, and, as a result, has been perpetually renegotiated and delayed, and may ultimately be denied.
Another example is CDB's multibillion-dollar China-Burma oil and gas pipeline projects, which have received similar local scrutiny. The "Shwe" gas project is co-ordinated by China National Petroleum Corporation, which has contracted some operations to Sinohydro. Local civil society organisations have mounted campaigns against land confiscation with limited compensation, loss of livelihood, the role of Burmese security forces in protecting the project, and environmental degradation: deforestation, river dredging and chemical pollution.Another example is CDB's multibillion-dollar China-Burma oil and gas pipeline projects, which have received similar local scrutiny. The "Shwe" gas project is co-ordinated by China National Petroleum Corporation, which has contracted some operations to Sinohydro. Local civil society organisations have mounted campaigns against land confiscation with limited compensation, loss of livelihood, the role of Burmese security forces in protecting the project, and environmental degradation: deforestation, river dredging and chemical pollution.
A third example is the Patuca hydroelectric project in Honduras, supported by EIBC and operated by Sinohydro. Approved by the Honduran government in 2011, one of the projects is said to entail flooding 42km of rainforest slated to be part of Patuca national park and the Tawahka Asangni biosphere reserve. The project was denounced by local civil society organisations, which cited the shaky foundations of the project's environmental impact assessment. NGOs, including International Rivers and The Nature Conservancy, have also sought to re-evaluate the project. Such campaigns, uniting locally affected communities with globally recognised NGOs that have access to media worldwide, have slowed projects and tainted investor image.A third example is the Patuca hydroelectric project in Honduras, supported by EIBC and operated by Sinohydro. Approved by the Honduran government in 2011, one of the projects is said to entail flooding 42km of rainforest slated to be part of Patuca national park and the Tawahka Asangni biosphere reserve. The project was denounced by local civil society organisations, which cited the shaky foundations of the project's environmental impact assessment. NGOs, including International Rivers and The Nature Conservancy, have also sought to re-evaluate the project. Such campaigns, uniting locally affected communities with globally recognised NGOs that have access to media worldwide, have slowed projects and tainted investor image.
Environment-related political risk can severely affect the bottom line of the major Chinese development banks to the extent that local scepticism and protests result in delays or even loss of projects. Doing the right thing on the environment and human rights would help maintain China's market access and help mitigate risks to China's development banks.Environment-related political risk can severely affect the bottom line of the major Chinese development banks to the extent that local scepticism and protests result in delays or even loss of projects. Doing the right thing on the environment and human rights would help maintain China's market access and help mitigate risks to China's development banks.
Adopting established international norms may help China's banks to secure markets in more developed countries. Chinese banks clearly seek to further penetrate markets such as the US and Europe, where an even higher level of environmental and social standards exists. Establishing a track record of good practice in emerging markets and developing countries could help Chinese banks assimilate, adapt and ultimately incorporate such practices into their daily operations, an experience that could prove essential as they also seek to navigate markets in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries.Adopting established international norms may help China's banks to secure markets in more developed countries. Chinese banks clearly seek to further penetrate markets such as the US and Europe, where an even higher level of environmental and social standards exists. Establishing a track record of good practice in emerging markets and developing countries could help Chinese banks assimilate, adapt and ultimately incorporate such practices into their daily operations, an experience that could prove essential as they also seek to navigate markets in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries.
For decades, developing countries have pined for a development bank that provides finance for inclusive growth and sustainable development – without draconian conditions. If China's development banks can add substantial social and environmental safeguards, they can become the beacon of 21st century development finance.For decades, developing countries have pined for a development bank that provides finance for inclusive growth and sustainable development – without draconian conditions. If China's development banks can add substantial social and environmental safeguards, they can become the beacon of 21st century development finance.
Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning.