This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/10/world/middleeast/egypt-elections.html

The article has changed 17 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Egypt’s Interim Head of State Seeks Quick Elections Egypt’s Interim Head of State Seeks Quick Elections
(about 1 hour later)
CAIRO (Reuters) — Egypt’s interim head of state has set a speedy timetable for elections to drag the Arab world’s biggest country from crisis, after the military ouster of Islamist President Mohamed Mursi last week sparked a wave of bloody protests. CAIRO (Reuters) — Egypt’s interim head of state has set a speedy timetable for elections to drag the Arab world’s biggest country from crisis, after the military ouster of Islamist President Mohamed Morsi last week sparked a wave of bloody protests.
A decree issued Monday by Adli Mansour pointed to a parliamentary ballot within about six months with a presidential vote to follow. However, it was faulted for repeating flaws in the 2011 transition plan that contributed to the current crisis.A decree issued Monday by Adli Mansour pointed to a parliamentary ballot within about six months with a presidential vote to follow. However, it was faulted for repeating flaws in the 2011 transition plan that contributed to the current crisis.
Mansour decreed that Egypt will hold new parliamentary elections once amendments to its suspended constitution are approved in a referendum — a process that could take about six months, less than some people had expected. Mr. Mansour decreed that Egypt will hold new parliamentary elections once amendments to its suspended constitution are approved in a referendum — a process that could take about six months, less than some people had expected.
In what appeared to be an olive branch to Islamists, the decree included controversial language put into the constitution last year that defined the principles of Islamic sharia law.In what appeared to be an olive branch to Islamists, the decree included controversial language put into the constitution last year that defined the principles of Islamic sharia law.
Whether that will be enough to lure back the hardline Islamist Nour Party, which had supported the military-led transition plans until Monday’s attack, remains to be seen. Al Nour, the country’s second-biggest Islamist group after the Muslim Brotherhood, said on Tuesday it would accept the choice of the former finance minister, Samir Radwan, as interim prime minister.
Nader Bakkar, an Al Nour spokesman, said the party would accept Mr. Radwan because he met the party’s criteria that he be a ‘'technocrat'’ economist and have previous experience in government administration.
The military-backed transitional administration is keen to win Al Nour’s support for a new government to show it is acceptable to Islamists after the army toppled Mr. Morsi last week.
Al Nour had said last week it would not accept former United Nations diplomat Mohamed ElBaradei as interim prime minister, deepening the turmoil surrounding the transition.
Al Nour said on Monday it was pulling out of negotiations over the new government in response to the killing of dozens of pro-Morsi protesters.
Nathan Brown, a leading expert on Egypt’s constitution at George Washington University in Washington, said that while Monday’s decree laid out a clear sequence for transition, it repeated many of the mistakes of the post-Mubarak process.Nathan Brown, a leading expert on Egypt’s constitution at George Washington University in Washington, said that while Monday’s decree laid out a clear sequence for transition, it repeated many of the mistakes of the post-Mubarak process.
‘'It was drawn up by an anonymous committee; it was issued by executive fiat; the timetable is rushed; the provisions for consultation are vague; and it promises inclusiveness but gives no clear procedural guidelines for it,'’ he told Reuters.‘'It was drawn up by an anonymous committee; it was issued by executive fiat; the timetable is rushed; the provisions for consultation are vague; and it promises inclusiveness but gives no clear procedural guidelines for it,'’ he told Reuters.