This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/sci/tech/6990868.stm

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
UK science head backs ethics code UK science head backs ethics code
(about 23 hours later)
The British government's chief scientific advisor has set out a universal ethical code for scientists.The British government's chief scientific advisor has set out a universal ethical code for scientists.
Professor Sir David King has outlined seven principles aimed at building trust between scientists and society.Professor Sir David King has outlined seven principles aimed at building trust between scientists and society.
Described as the scientific equivalent of doctors' Hippocratic Oath, the code includes clauses on corruption, public consultation and the environment.Described as the scientific equivalent of doctors' Hippocratic Oath, the code includes clauses on corruption, public consultation and the environment.
He launched the code at the British Association for the Advancement of Science's annual festival in York.He launched the code at the British Association for the Advancement of Science's annual festival in York.
The seven points in this code are part of what separates researchers from charlatans Dr Evan Harris The aim, he said, was to outline responsibilities and values in order to encourage researchers to reflect on the impact their work would have on wider society.The seven points in this code are part of what separates researchers from charlatans Dr Evan Harris The aim, he said, was to outline responsibilities and values in order to encourage researchers to reflect on the impact their work would have on wider society.
"We believe if every scientist followed the code, we would improve the quality of science and remove many of the concerns society has about research," Professor King told BBC News."We believe if every scientist followed the code, we would improve the quality of science and remove many of the concerns society has about research," Professor King told BBC News.
Code endorsedCode endorsed
The scientific profession generally has high standards of integrity, and many scientists have a social conscience, according to Professor King. But there is no formal code of ethics.The scientific profession generally has high standards of integrity, and many scientists have a social conscience, according to Professor King. But there is no formal code of ethics.
THE CODE Act with skill and care, keep skills up to datePrevent corrupt practice and declare conflicts of interestRespect and acknowledge the work of other scientistsEnsure that research is justified and lawfulMinimise impacts on people, animals and the environmentDiscuss issues science raises for societyDo not mislead; present evidence honestly "It's important to look at the relationship between science and the public," he said.THE CODE Act with skill and care, keep skills up to datePrevent corrupt practice and declare conflicts of interestRespect and acknowledge the work of other scientistsEnsure that research is justified and lawfulMinimise impacts on people, animals and the environmentDiscuss issues science raises for societyDo not mislead; present evidence honestly "It's important to look at the relationship between science and the public," he said.
"If we have a breakthrough, and society is not accepting of that, then we have a problem; so what we need is for scientists to accept the code and follow it". "If we have a breakthrough, and society is not accepting of that, then we have a problem; so what we need is for scientists to accept the code and follow it."
The code has been adopted by scientists working in the UK government - and Professor King has invited researchers in UK universities and industry to join them. Next year it will be launched internationally.The code has been adopted by scientists working in the UK government - and Professor King has invited researchers in UK universities and industry to join them. Next year it will be launched internationally.
The idea was swiftly backed by Lib Dem science spokesman Dr Evan Harris.The idea was swiftly backed by Lib Dem science spokesman Dr Evan Harris.
"The seven points in this code are part of what separates researchers from charlatans, medicine from quackery and science from supposition," he said."The seven points in this code are part of what separates researchers from charlatans, medicine from quackery and science from supposition," he said.
"It deserves the full support of the science world and policy-makers from the UN down to university governing bodies and company boards.""It deserves the full support of the science world and policy-makers from the UN down to university governing bodies and company boards."
Science after Hwang's fall The Royal Society of Chemistry also approved, issuing a statement saying: "We are proud that all of our 44,000 members across the world, including Sir David King himself, have already signed up to such a code and subject themselves to independent regulation and scrutiny of their professional duties."Science after Hwang's fall The Royal Society of Chemistry also approved, issuing a statement saying: "We are proud that all of our 44,000 members across the world, including Sir David King himself, have already signed up to such a code and subject themselves to independent regulation and scrutiny of their professional duties."
Professor King conceded that the code could create conflicts between employers and indviduals, but suggested it could also help resolve them. Professor King conceded that the code could create conflicts between employers and individuals, but suggested it could also help resolve them.
"Place yourself in the position of a scientist who works for a tobacco company, and the company asks you to counter evidence about the health impacts of tobacco."Place yourself in the position of a scientist who works for a tobacco company, and the company asks you to counter evidence about the health impacts of tobacco.
"That scientist would be able to look at the code and say 'I can't do that'." "That scientist would be able to look at the code and say, 'I can't do that'."