This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk/6982884.stm

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Groups pull out of nuclear debate Groups pull out of nuclear debate
(about 4 hours later)
Green groups have pulled out of the debate over whether the UK should build new nuclear power stations. Environmental groups have pulled out of a consultation on whether the UK should build nuclear power stations, saying it is not a "fair and full debate".
Organisations such as Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth are unhappy with the way the government has presented the arguments to the public. Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth are among those unhappy with the way the government has presented the arguments.
As a result the groups are withdrawing from the process, which includes public meetings across the UK on Saturday. They had already won a High Court ruling that a previous consultation was "seriously flawed" and "misleading".
Business and Enterprise Secretary John Hutton said he would be "extremely disappointed" if the groups pulled out.Business and Enterprise Secretary John Hutton said he would be "extremely disappointed" if the groups pulled out.
'Very critical' Public meetings are being held across the UK on Saturday, on the principle of including nuclear power as part of Britain's energy mix, but a coalition of groups has withdrawn its support.
It is up to the government to decide, is it going to carry out a proper public consultation or not? John SauvenGreenpeace
Most existing nuclear power stations are due to close by 2023 and the government has said its "preliminary view" is that new stations should be built - to reduce carbon emissions and Britain's reliance on foreign oil and gas imports.
Environmental groups say that the consultation, rather than presenting a "fair and full public debate", was more about promoting nuclear power.
John Sauven, from Greenpeace, told BBC News: "It is up to the government to decide, is it going to carry out a proper public consultation or not?John Sauven, from Greenpeace, told BBC News: "It is up to the government to decide, is it going to carry out a proper public consultation or not?
"Their own advisers have told them that this consultation should last for nine months, it should put all the information before the public, and they have been very critical of the way it is currently being carried out.""Their own advisers have told them that this consultation should last for nine months, it should put all the information before the public, and they have been very critical of the way it is currently being carried out."
'Stitch-up'
The environmental organisations have formed a coalition, and branded the consultation process a "public relations stitch-up".The environmental organisations have formed a coalition, and branded the consultation process a "public relations stitch-up".
A spokesman for Friends of the Earth said: "We do not feel it was a fair and full public debate, it was much more about promoting the arguments for nuclear power. Friends of the Earth said it would not be sending representatives to the meetings, and that it would make its case officially to the government.
"What we want to do is signal to the wider public and the government that we don't think this was a proper consultation." Earlier this year Greenpeace successfully challenged a previous consultation on the issue at the High Court arguing it had been "a sham".
The organisation said it would not be sending representatives to the meetings, and that it would make its case officially to the government. It is possible that the government might change its view John HuttonBusiness and Enterprise Secretary
'Unprecedented consultation' The judge granted a quashing order and the government began the new consultation.
Mr Hutton said: "We are doing all we possibly can to involve the public in coming to a view with government about what is in the long-term best interests of our country and our society and our environment.
"I think the length of time we are putting into the consultation, the effort of trying to involve organisations like Greenpeace and others, has been unprecedented.
"The issue about the quality of the consultation can't be judged simply by looking at the period of time that elapses from the beginning of it to the end of it. What matters is the input into it."
Mr Hutton said the government had made a preliminary view about the nuclear issue but did not have a "closed mind".Mr Hutton said the government had made a preliminary view about the nuclear issue but did not have a "closed mind".
The government's Energy White Paper on the future of power supplies in the UK has backed renewable energy and efficiency measures. "It is possible that the government might change its view," he said, but told the BBC it would take a "very, very strong" argument to persuade them to reduce the "nuclear element in the energy mix".
However, it said the preliminary view supports more nuclear plants to help reduce carbon emissions and to ensure supplies are secure. 'Long-term interests'
Critics have called the consultation process a "farce". He said: "We are doing all we possibly can to involve the public in coming to a view with government about what is in the long-term best interests of our country and our society and our environment."
He said the effort put into the consultation had been "unprecedented".
"The issue about the quality of the consultation can't be judged simply by looking at the period of time that elapses from the beginning of it to the end of it. What matters is the input into it."
Liberal Democrat leader Sir Menzies Campbell said he understood concerns about the "deeply flawed consultation".
"The government has failed to observe the spirit of the High Court ruling, by making up its mind on nuclear power long before this latest consultation had even begun," he said.
The government's Energy White Paper on the future of power supplies in the UK also backs renewable energy and efficiency measures.