This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/england/london/6052608.stm

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
'Offence' over BA necklace ruling Woman to sue BA in necklace row
(10 minutes later)
Christian groups have spoken of their offence at a British Airways ruling which prevented a Christian employee from wearing a cross around her neck. A Heathrow Airport employee has said she plans to sue British Airways for religious discrimination in a row over the wearing of a cross necklace.
Heathrow check-in worker Nadia Eweida, 55, said she planned to sue the company for religious discrimination. Check-in worker Nadia Eweida, 55, of Twickenham, said she was effectively "forced" to take unpaid leave after refusing to conceal the symbol.
BA is facing a boycott call from some Christians, but it denied it had banned wearing of crosses. BA denied it had banned the wearing of crosses.
The airline said its uniform policy stated that such items could be worn if concealed underneath the uniform. It said its uniform policy stated that such items could be worn if concealed underneath the uniform.
'Double standards'
It said items such as turbans and bangles could be worn as it was impractical for staff to conceal them.It said items such as turbans and bangles could be worn as it was impractical for staff to conceal them.
BA are being extremely offensive to members of the Christian faith John Andrews, Bath and Wells diocese
BA has been accused of double standards by some Christian groups.BA has been accused of double standards by some Christian groups.
John Andrews, communications officer for the diocese of Bath and Wells, said: "I think BA are being extremely offensive to members of the Christian faith."John Andrews, communications officer for the diocese of Bath and Wells, said: "I think BA are being extremely offensive to members of the Christian faith."
He said: "It would be a great shame if Christians are prevented from demonstrating their own faith. It is a basic human right.He said: "It would be a great shame if Christians are prevented from demonstrating their own faith. It is a basic human right.
"If she is wearing it as a symbol of her Christian faith she should be allowed to do it. It is rather more than an ornament. It is more than an item of jewellery.""If she is wearing it as a symbol of her Christian faith she should be allowed to do it. It is rather more than an ornament. It is more than an item of jewellery."
Unpaid leave 'Bureaucratic'
Anglican Communion press officer Canon James Rosenthal said: "I'm happy to know that BA understands that the cross is more than a piece of jewellery but I'm shocked to think that someone would be asked to remove it from their person." Miss Eweida, who has been with BA for seven years, said she wore the cross because of her deeply-held religious beliefs. She is from an Egyptian background and attends Pentecostal as well as Arabic churches.
Miss Eweida, who has been with BA for seven years, claims she was effectively "forced" to take unpaid leave after refusing to remove or conceal the symbol, about the size of a five pence piece.
Miss Eweida, from Twickenham, west London, said she wore the cross because of her deeply-held religious beliefs. She is from an Egyptian background and attends Pentecostal as well as Arabic churches.
'Very inflexible'
Kent Conservative MP Ann Widdecombe urged a boycott of BA.Kent Conservative MP Ann Widdecombe urged a boycott of BA.
She said: "My view is that Christians do not have to take this. BA is a commercial organisation. It's not as if it's the government."She said: "My view is that Christians do not have to take this. BA is a commercial organisation. It's not as if it's the government."
Liberal Democrat deputy leader Vince Cable, Miss Eweida's MP, said of BA: "They are just being very bureaucratic and very inflexible. For a commercial business this is not good enough."Liberal Democrat deputy leader Vince Cable, Miss Eweida's MP, said of BA: "They are just being very bureaucratic and very inflexible. For a commercial business this is not good enough."
A BA spokeswoman said Miss Eweida had not been suspended. She said the matter remained under investigation and an appeal was due to be heard next week.A BA spokeswoman said Miss Eweida had not been suspended. She said the matter remained under investigation and an appeal was due to be heard next week.
She said BA recognised that uniformed employees may wish to wear jewellery including religious symbols.She said BA recognised that uniformed employees may wish to wear jewellery including religious symbols.
"Our uniform policy states that these items can be worn, underneath the uniform. There is no ban."Our uniform policy states that these items can be worn, underneath the uniform. There is no ban.
"This rule applies for all jewellery and religious symbols on chains and is not specific to the Christian cross.""This rule applies for all jewellery and religious symbols on chains and is not specific to the Christian cross."