This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/05/world/middleeast/un-panel-reports-increasing-brutality-by-both-sides-in-syria.html

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
U.N. Panel Reports Increasing Brutality by Both Sides in Syria Conflict U.N. Panel Reports Increasing Brutality by Both Sides in Syria Conflict
(35 minutes later)
GENEVA — Reporting “new levels of brutality” in Syria’s more than two-year-old conflict, United Nations investigators said on Tuesday they believed chemical weapons and thermobaric bombs were used in recent weeks and urged the international community to cut off supplies of weapons that could only result in more civilian casualties.GENEVA — Reporting “new levels of brutality” in Syria’s more than two-year-old conflict, United Nations investigators said on Tuesday they believed chemical weapons and thermobaric bombs were used in recent weeks and urged the international community to cut off supplies of weapons that could only result in more civilian casualties.
The Commission of Inquiry investigating the hostilities in Syria said it “documents for the first time the systematic imposition of sieges, the use of chemical agents and forcible displacement” in a report presented to the United Nations Human Rights Council. “War crimes, crimes against humanity and gross human rights violations continue apace,” it added, reporting 17 incidents that could be called massacres between mid-January and mid-May.The Commission of Inquiry investigating the hostilities in Syria said it “documents for the first time the systematic imposition of sieges, the use of chemical agents and forcible displacement” in a report presented to the United Nations Human Rights Council. “War crimes, crimes against humanity and gross human rights violations continue apace,” it added, reporting 17 incidents that could be called massacres between mid-January and mid-May.
The four-person panel, which is seen by diplomats as providing the most factual and authoritative record of developments in Syria, said “there are reasonable grounds to believe limited quantities of toxic chemicals were used” in Aleppo and Damascus on March 19, in Aleppo again on April 13 and in Idlib on April 29. “Other incidents remain under investigation,” the panel reported. The findings played directly into the increasingly divisive debate in Europe and the United States about the possibility of supplying weapons to the rebels seeking the overthrow of President Bashar al-Assad in more than two years of strife that have turned into a full-blown civil war in which an estimated 80,000 people have died.
Last month, Britain and France pressed their partners in the European Union to allow an embargo on arms supplies to Syria to lapse, potentially allowing European governments to arm the rebels they support politically and diplomatically. At the same time, though, Moscow has said it will supply government forces with advanced ground-to-air missiles.
The latest report also recalled a warning by President Obama that the use of chemical weapons in Syria would cross a “red line” even as the United States and Russia work toward convening an international peace conference on Syria.
The four-person United Nations panel, which is seen by diplomats as providing the most factual and authoritative record of developments in Syria, said “there are reasonable grounds to believe limited quantities of toxic chemicals were used” in Aleppo and Damascus on March 19, in Aleppo again on April 13 and in Idlib on April 29. “Other incidents remain under investigation,” the panel reported.
They based their assertion on interviews with victims of attacks, refugees from Syria and some medical personnel, Paulo Pinheiro, the panel chairman, told reporters on Monday, but he refused to give further details. French authorities have agreed to share with the panel the results of an analysis they are conducting of samples received from casualties who had made their way to Turkey, he said.They based their assertion on interviews with victims of attacks, refugees from Syria and some medical personnel, Paulo Pinheiro, the panel chairman, told reporters on Monday, but he refused to give further details. French authorities have agreed to share with the panel the results of an analysis they are conducting of samples received from casualties who had made their way to Turkey, he said.
Carla del Ponte, one of the commission members, told Swiss-Italian television last month that testimony from victims pointed to the use of the nerve gas sarin by rebel groups but other members of the commission quickly distanced themselves from her assertion and their report said they cannot identify either the chemical agents used, the means of delivery or the people using them. Use of chemical weapons, they noted, would constitute a war crime.Carla del Ponte, one of the commission members, told Swiss-Italian television last month that testimony from victims pointed to the use of the nerve gas sarin by rebel groups but other members of the commission quickly distanced themselves from her assertion and their report said they cannot identify either the chemical agents used, the means of delivery or the people using them. Use of chemical weapons, they noted, would constitute a war crime.
The panel also reported for the first time the use by government forces of thermobaric bombs which scatter a cloud of explosive particles before detonating, sending a devastating blast of pressure and extreme heat that incinerates those caught in the blast and sucks the oxygen from the lungs of people in the vicinity. Such weapons were used in March in the fierce struggle for the strategic town of Qusayr, the panel reported. “If the use was indiscriminate, this could be a war crime,” Paulo Pinheiro, the panel’s chairman said.The panel also reported for the first time the use by government forces of thermobaric bombs which scatter a cloud of explosive particles before detonating, sending a devastating blast of pressure and extreme heat that incinerates those caught in the blast and sucks the oxygen from the lungs of people in the vicinity. Such weapons were used in March in the fierce struggle for the strategic town of Qusayr, the panel reported. “If the use was indiscriminate, this could be a war crime,” Paulo Pinheiro, the panel’s chairman said.
The panel cited increasing use of indiscriminate weapons, including cluster munitions, barrel bombs and surface-to-surface missiles as evidence of the “flagrant disregard” of government forces for the distinction between combatants and civilians demanded by international law. “There is a strong element of retribution in the government’s approach, with civilians paying a price for “allowing” armed groups to operate within their towns,” the report said.The panel cited increasing use of indiscriminate weapons, including cluster munitions, barrel bombs and surface-to-surface missiles as evidence of the “flagrant disregard” of government forces for the distinction between combatants and civilians demanded by international law. “There is a strong element of retribution in the government’s approach, with civilians paying a price for “allowing” armed groups to operate within their towns,” the report said.
Both sides had adopted siege tactics, trapping civilians in their homes and cutting off supplies of food, water, medicines and electricity, the report stated, in clear breach of international law. The panel also reported instances in which forces of both sides have used attacks or the threat of them to drive civilians out of particular areas, which is also a war crime.Both sides had adopted siege tactics, trapping civilians in their homes and cutting off supplies of food, water, medicines and electricity, the report stated, in clear breach of international law. The panel also reported instances in which forces of both sides have used attacks or the threat of them to drive civilians out of particular areas, which is also a war crime.
But these were only new tendencies in a conflict where “crimes that shock the conscience have become a daily reality,” Mr. Pinheiro said, reciting a list of abuses that included murder, extrajudicial execution, torture, recruitment of children and hostage taking.But these were only new tendencies in a conflict where “crimes that shock the conscience have become a daily reality,” Mr. Pinheiro said, reciting a list of abuses that included murder, extrajudicial execution, torture, recruitment of children and hostage taking.
There was a disparity between the abuses and crimes committed by government forces and militia and those conducted by rebel groups, he acknowledged, “but this is a disparity in intensity, it is not a disparity in the nature of the crimes.” He added, “They are the same.”There was a disparity between the abuses and crimes committed by government forces and militia and those conducted by rebel groups, he acknowledged, “but this is a disparity in intensity, it is not a disparity in the nature of the crimes.” He added, “They are the same.”
After more than two years of conflict, it was clear a military stalemate now prevailed. “It’s an illusion that more weapons will tip the balance between the two parties. No one is winning,” Mr. Pinheiro said. The report warned that “increased arm transfers hurt the prospect of a political settlement to the conflict, fuel the multiplication of armed actors at the national and regional levels and have devastating consequences for civilians.”After more than two years of conflict, it was clear a military stalemate now prevailed. “It’s an illusion that more weapons will tip the balance between the two parties. No one is winning,” Mr. Pinheiro said. The report warned that “increased arm transfers hurt the prospect of a political settlement to the conflict, fuel the multiplication of armed actors at the national and regional levels and have devastating consequences for civilians.”

Alan Cowell contributed reporting from London.