This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/england/lancashire/6975761.stm

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Board demands custody care review Board demands custody care review
(about 1 hour later)
A report into the death of the youngest person to die in custody has demanded a full review of the use of restraints. A report into the death of the youngest person to die in custody has called for sweeping changes to how children are dealt with in the youth justice system.
Adam Rickwood, 14, from Burnley, Lancashire, hanged himself at Hassockfield Secure Training Centre (STC) in County Durham in 2004. Adam Rickwood, 14, hanged himself at Hassockfield Secure Training Centre (STC) in County Durham in 2004.
Before his death Adam had been restrained by staff using a "nose distraction technique". Staff had subdued the Burnley teenager with a restraint technique involving a sharp blow to the nose.
The Lancashire Safeguarding Children Board (LSCB) review said children under 16 years should not be kept in custody. An official report said detaining under 16s was unacceptable except in the most exceptional circumstances.
Adam Rickwood was sent to the STC having been charged with an offence of wounding. Adam Rickwood was sent to the STC in County Durham in July 2004 after being charged with an offence of wounding.
In May 2007 a jury ruled that he had committed suicide at the privately-run secure unit. He was found hanged by his shoelaces in his room four weeks later. An inquest jury returned a verdict of suicide after a month-long hearing into the circumstances surrounding the use of restraint techniques.
Exceptional circumstances Suicidal tendencies
While at the unit he had written to his mother saying he would kill himself if forced to stay there, the jury at Chester-le-Street Magistrates' Court heard. During the inquest, the jury heard that the teenager had suffered a string of mental health problems including suicidal tendencies alongside drink and drug abuse.
He had suffered from mental health problems, drink and drug abuse and had suicidal tendencies, the court heard. He had written to his mother warning he would kill himself if forced to stay in the unit.
The jury was also told that in the hours before his death Adam had been restrained by staff using a "nose distraction technique" in which upward pressure is placed on the nose to cause a short pain. Hours before his death, staff had ordered the teenager to his room after he and other boys became rowdy.
The Lancashire Safeguarding Children Board said it was unacceptable to detain a child under the age of 16 years in a custodial setting in all but the most exceptional circumstances. Staff told the inquest into his death that the boy began a confrontation and refused to calm down. As an attempt was made to restrain him, he lashed out and attempted to bite.
Status reviewed One member of staff restrained the boy with the "nose distraction technique" - an upward blow to the nose.
Gill Rigg, chairwoman of the LSCB, said the review had made 49 recommendations to help stop similar incidents happening in the future rather than pointing the finger of blame at any one person or agency. The technique is a legally sanctioned method of subduing a teenage detainee in extreme circumstances and is designed to shock and stun.
The LSCB suggested that children under the age of 16 should be accommodated in a secure unit within 50 miles of their home. The Howard League for Penal Reform has alternatively described it as a kind of karate chop.
It also recommended when a child is remanded, the receiving unit should be given a full written record of all the agencies involved with the child, an assessment of substance misuse and any history of self harm. The 14-year-old had a nose bleed following the blow and was carried to his room face down to prevent him choking on his own blood.
Any child made the subject of a court order at a time when no secure beds are available should have his status reviewed within three days, the report also proposed. Recommendations
Gill Rigg, chairwoman of the Lancashire Safeguarding Children Board (LSCB), the official body charged with investigating what happened, said children under 16 should not be kept in custody in all but the most exceptional circumstances.
The body wanted the government to provide "urgent clarification" on the legal status of children placed by courts in secure centres and for a urgent review of the use of "pain distraction" techniques.
One of the most controversial, a form of hold, was banned following a separate teenager death in custody.
Among the 49 recommendations, the body also said children under the age of 16 should be held in a secure unit within 50 miles of their home and that the receiving unit should be given a full history of the child's mental health.
A spokesman for the Youth Justice Board said it was looking at the report with interest.
"Everything possible should be done to keep young people out of custody," said a YJB statement.
"However, we need the full commitment and input of children's and other mainstream service providers to ensure that appropriate early interventions are made to keep those children and young people identified as at risk of offending out of trouble in the first place, and to ensure their needs in and following a period in secure accommodation are met."