This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2013/apr/30/dappy-loses-appeal-conviction
The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 2 | Version 3 |
|---|---|
| Dappy loses appeal against conviction | Dappy loses appeal against conviction |
| (12 days later) | |
| Reading on mobile? Click here to view video | Reading on mobile? Click here to view video |
| N-Dubz rapper Dappy, who was found guilty of assault and affray, has lost a challenge against his conviction. | N-Dubz rapper Dappy, who was found guilty of assault and affray, has lost a challenge against his conviction. |
| The 25-year-old was not at the court of appeal in London to hear three judges led by the Lord Chief Justice Lord Judge reject his case. | The 25-year-old was not at the court of appeal in London to hear three judges led by the Lord Chief Justice Lord Judge reject his case. |
| Dappy, whose real name is Costadinos Contostavlos, was given a six-month sentence, suspended for 18 months, at Guildford crown court in February in connection with a brawl at a petrol station. He was also ordered to carry out 150 hours of community service. | Dappy, whose real name is Costadinos Contostavlos, was given a six-month sentence, suspended for 18 months, at Guildford crown court in February in connection with a brawl at a petrol station. He was also ordered to carry out 150 hours of community service. |
| His co-defendants, Kieran Vassell – the brother of Dappy's partner Kaye Vassell – and songwriter Alfred Miller lost appeals against their sentences. | His co-defendants, Kieran Vassell – the brother of Dappy's partner Kaye Vassell – and songwriter Alfred Miller lost appeals against their sentences. |
| Vassell, 25, of Hammersmith, west London, who denied affray and said he only acted to protect Dappy, was found guilty and jailed for 14 months. Miller, 28, of Brentford, west London, pleaded guilty to affray and was sentenced to 19 months. | Vassell, 25, of Hammersmith, west London, who denied affray and said he only acted to protect Dappy, was found guilty and jailed for 14 months. Miller, 28, of Brentford, west London, pleaded guilty to affray and was sentenced to 19 months. |
| Mr Justice Royce said neither sentence was manifestly excessive in what was a serious affray. | Mr Justice Royce said neither sentence was manifestly excessive in what was a serious affray. |
| The trial heard that the fight started after Dappy spat at a man who stepped in to protect two women with whom the rapper had started arguing. | The trial heard that the fight started after Dappy spat at a man who stepped in to protect two women with whom the rapper had started arguing. |
| At the appeal, his lawyers argued that the trial judge should not have admitted evidence of an assault conviction in 2008 that involved spitting, and was wrong not to discharge the jury after a newspaper published an article accompanied by a photo of the singer spitting. They alleged this created a real risk of serious prejudice. | At the appeal, his lawyers argued that the trial judge should not have admitted evidence of an assault conviction in 2008 that involved spitting, and was wrong not to discharge the jury after a newspaper published an article accompanied by a photo of the singer spitting. They alleged this created a real risk of serious prejudice. |
| Royce said the judge was fully entitled to admit the 2008 conviction and to conclude that it would not be right to discharge the jury. "The photo in this case does not show him spitting at anyone. It shows him simply spitting." | Royce said the judge was fully entitled to admit the 2008 conviction and to conclude that it would not be right to discharge the jury. "The photo in this case does not show him spitting at anyone. It shows him simply spitting." |
| He added that the judge weighed up matters with care and indicated he would remind the jury that they must decide the case on the evidence they heard in court, which he did. | He added that the judge weighed up matters with care and indicated he would remind the jury that they must decide the case on the evidence they heard in court, which he did. |
| In his judgment, the jury had not been deflected from a proper and fair analysis of the evidence. | In his judgment, the jury had not been deflected from a proper and fair analysis of the evidence. |
| Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning. | Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning. |
| Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning. Enter your email address to subscribe. | Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning. Enter your email address to subscribe. |
| Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning. |