This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-22006841

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Benefit reforms: Iain Duncan Smith 'has lived on breadline' Benefit reforms: Iain Duncan Smith 'has lived on breadline'
(about 3 hours later)
Work and Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan Smith has insisted he knows what it is like to "live on the breadline".Work and Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan Smith has insisted he knows what it is like to "live on the breadline".
The comment comes after 250,000 people signed a petition urging Mr Duncan Smith to try living on £53 a week. The comment comes after 330,000 people signed a petition urging Mr Duncan Smith to try living on £53 a week.
He dismissed this as a "complete stunt", telling the Wanstead and Woodford Guardian he had been unemployed twice in his life.He dismissed this as a "complete stunt", telling the Wanstead and Woodford Guardian he had been unemployed twice in his life.
The debate follows a welfare shake-up including cuts to housing benefit for some social housing tenants.The debate follows a welfare shake-up including cuts to housing benefit for some social housing tenants.
Campaigners argue this will hit vulnerable families, but ministers say they are making difficult decisions to incentivise work.Campaigners argue this will hit vulnerable families, but ministers say they are making difficult decisions to incentivise work.
Mr Duncan Smith told BBC Radio 4's Today programme on Monday, the day the changes came into force, that he could survive on £53 a week.Mr Duncan Smith told BBC Radio 4's Today programme on Monday, the day the changes came into force, that he could survive on £53 a week.
This was the amount another speaker on the show - market trader David Bennett, from County Durham - said he would be left with.This was the amount another speaker on the show - market trader David Bennett, from County Durham - said he would be left with.
'Already done this''Already done this'
Mr Duncan Smith's remark prompted an online petition, hosted at Change.org, calling on the work and pensions secretary "to live on this budget for at least one year".Mr Duncan Smith's remark prompted an online petition, hosted at Change.org, calling on the work and pensions secretary "to live on this budget for at least one year".
It says: "This would help realise the Conservative Party's current mantra that 'We are all in this together'.It says: "This would help realise the Conservative Party's current mantra that 'We are all in this together'.
"This would mean a 97% reduction in his current income, which is £1,581.02 a week or £225 a day after tax.""This would mean a 97% reduction in his current income, which is £1,581.02 a week or £225 a day after tax."
More than 250,000 people had signed the petition by 17:00 BST on Tuesday. More than 330,000 people had signed the petition by 22:30 BST on Tuesday.
But Mr Duncan Smith, MP for Chingford and Woodford Green, told the Wanstead and Woodford Guardian: "This is a complete stunt which distracts attention from the welfare reforms which are much more important and which I have been working hard to get done.But Mr Duncan Smith, MP for Chingford and Woodford Green, told the Wanstead and Woodford Guardian: "This is a complete stunt which distracts attention from the welfare reforms which are much more important and which I have been working hard to get done.
"I have been unemployed twice in my life so I have already done this. I know what it is like to live on the breadline.""I have been unemployed twice in my life so I have already done this. I know what it is like to live on the breadline."
Chancellor George Osborne was also challenged about whether he could survive on £53 a week.Chancellor George Osborne was also challenged about whether he could survive on £53 a week.
He said: "I don't think it's sensible to reduce this debate to an argument about one individual's set of circumstances.He said: "I don't think it's sensible to reduce this debate to an argument about one individual's set of circumstances.
"We have a welfare system where there are lots of benefits to people on very low incomes.""We have a welfare system where there are lots of benefits to people on very low incomes."