This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk/6957814.stm

The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Public 'support pay-as-you-throw' 'Many' support pay-as-you-throw
(about 1 hour later)
Almost two-thirds of people would support a "pay-as-you-throw" system of collecting household waste, a Local Government Association survey suggests.Almost two-thirds of people would support a "pay-as-you-throw" system of collecting household waste, a Local Government Association survey suggests.
Its poll of 1,028 people found 64% in favour of lower council tax and charges according to how much rubbish they left, with recyclers paying less. Its poll of 1,028 people found 64% in favour of lower council tax and charges according to how much rubbish they put out, with recyclers paying less.
The LGA has set out three schemes to cut waste and encourage more recycling. The LGA has set out three possible schemes for England and Wales.
It has insisted the "pay-as-you-throw" proposals would not be a stealth tax to raise extra cash for councils. The government said it had finished a consultation on "pay-as-you-throw" and was looking at changing the law.
The LGA says the survey shows support for changing the law to allow English and Welsh councils to introduce waste charges. A Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs spokeswoman said: "We would need to change the law to introduce variable waste charges and it might be possible to do something in the Climate Change Bill.
The three schemes outlined by the association are: "It would be a cost-neutral option, not a stealth tax, and local authorities could only take it up if they had the infrastructure to enable people to recycle."
The LGA said its survey showed public support for changing the law to allow councils to introduce waste charges.
The three schemes outlined by the LGA are:
  • Householders buy different sized pre-paid rubbish sacks, which it says would be practical in urban areas
  • Wheelie bins fitted with microchips allowing rubbish to be weighed as it is dumped into the refuse truck
  • Homes choose the size of their wheelie bin and are charged accordingly
  • Householders buy different sized pre-paid rubbish sacks, which it says would be practical in urban areas
  • Wheelie bins fitted with microchips allowing rubbish to be weighed as it is dumped into the refuse truck
  • Homes choose the size of their wheelie bin and are charged accordingly
The LGA said any scheme would be dependent on local circumstances and would have to be supported by residents.The LGA said any scheme would be dependent on local circumstances and would have to be supported by residents.
Cllr Paul Bettison, chairman of the LGA's environment board, said: "If councils introduce save-as-you-throw schemes, it will be to promote recycling, not generate extra cash through an extra stealth tax.Cllr Paul Bettison, chairman of the LGA's environment board, said: "If councils introduce save-as-you-throw schemes, it will be to promote recycling, not generate extra cash through an extra stealth tax.
"There is now strong public support for schemes that reward people for recycling and councils should be given the power to introduce these where it is appropriate to do so.""There is now strong public support for schemes that reward people for recycling and councils should be given the power to introduce these where it is appropriate to do so."
Fortnightly collections
The IPSOS Mori poll for the LGA also found 23% of those surveyed were against waste charges, with 15% strongly opposed.The IPSOS Mori poll for the LGA also found 23% of those surveyed were against waste charges, with 15% strongly opposed.
The association added that schemes elsewhere in Europe where households pay by weight, volume, or use pre-paid sacks have led to dramatic reductions in household waste and much higher recycling rates.The association added that schemes elsewhere in Europe where households pay by weight, volume, or use pre-paid sacks have led to dramatic reductions in household waste and much higher recycling rates.
The LGA also warned that if local authorities failed to act to cut the use of landfill, councils and council taxpayers could face EU fines of up to £3bn over the next four years. It also warned that if local authorities failed to act to cut the use of landfill, councils and council taxpayers could face EU fines of up to £3bn over the next four years.
The UK produces more waste per head of population than many of its European neighbours and also has one of the worst recycling rates.
The government has been looking at a series of measures to meet EU landfill targets, which demand a 25% reduction on 1995 levels by 2010 and a 65% cut by 2020.
In some places, it has introduced controversial fortnightly bin collections, alternating between landfill waste and recyclable waste, but this policy was recently criticised by MPs.
They said it was not appropriate for inner cities and there was no proof it increased recycling.
Last week, the government also announced possible plans to increase the number of recycling bins placed next to public litter bins, in an effort to encourage more recycling away from the domestic environment.