This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/mar/06/house-votes-prevent-shutdown-sequester
The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 3 | Version 4 |
---|---|
House votes to prevent US federal government shutdown amid sequester | House votes to prevent US federal government shutdown amid sequester |
(8 days later) | |
The House of Representatives approved legislation Wednesday to prevent a shutdown of the US government on March 27 and blunt the impact of newly imposed spending cuts on the Department of Defense. | The House of Representatives approved legislation Wednesday to prevent a shutdown of the US government on March 27 and blunt the impact of newly imposed spending cuts on the Department of Defense. |
The 267-151 vote sent the measure to the Senate, where Democrats hope to give additional Cabinet agencies similar flexibility in implementing their shares of the $85bn in spending cuts required to take effect by the end of the budget year. | The 267-151 vote sent the measure to the Senate, where Democrats hope to give additional Cabinet agencies similar flexibility in implementing their shares of the $85bn in spending cuts required to take effect by the end of the budget year. |
Republicans said the measure was essential to keep the government operating smoothly after current funding expires on March 27. | Republicans said the measure was essential to keep the government operating smoothly after current funding expires on March 27. |
Democrats who opposed the measure protested the embedded spending cuts and criticized Republicans for refusing to replace some of them with tax loophole closings. | Democrats who opposed the measure protested the embedded spending cuts and criticized Republicans for refusing to replace some of them with tax loophole closings. |
Ironically, the measure underscored joint efforts by the Obama administration and congressional Republicans to ease the impact of short-term spending cuts that kicked in with dire White House warnings a few days ago. At the same time, both are eager to pocket the full savings for deficit reduction as they pivot to a new clash over Medicare next week, when House Republicans and Senate Democrats are expected to unveil rival budgets. | Ironically, the measure underscored joint efforts by the Obama administration and congressional Republicans to ease the impact of short-term spending cuts that kicked in with dire White House warnings a few days ago. At the same time, both are eager to pocket the full savings for deficit reduction as they pivot to a new clash over Medicare next week, when House Republicans and Senate Democrats are expected to unveil rival budgets. |
The overall size of the cuts in the no-shutdown spending bill remains in place: $85bn in reductions through the end of the budget year on September 30, half from defense and half from domestic programs as diverse as education, parks and payments to doctors and hospitals treating Medicare patients. | The overall size of the cuts in the no-shutdown spending bill remains in place: $85bn in reductions through the end of the budget year on September 30, half from defense and half from domestic programs as diverse as education, parks and payments to doctors and hospitals treating Medicare patients. |
But legislation drafted by House Republicans to prevent a government shutdown on March 27 also gives the Pentagon and the Veterans Affairs Department flexibility to allocate cuts that no agency currently enjoys. | But legislation drafted by House Republicans to prevent a government shutdown on March 27 also gives the Pentagon and the Veterans Affairs Department flexibility to allocate cuts that no agency currently enjoys. |
Senate Democrats seem likely to agree to the flexibility if it can be expanded to include other agencies, according to several officials who described closed-door talks that also involved the White House. Among the candidates are the departments of Homeland Security, Transportation, Justice and State. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity, saying they were not authorized to disclose details. | Senate Democrats seem likely to agree to the flexibility if it can be expanded to include other agencies, according to several officials who described closed-door talks that also involved the White House. Among the candidates are the departments of Homeland Security, Transportation, Justice and State. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity, saying they were not authorized to disclose details. |
The move marks a reversal for President Barack Obama and Senate majority leader Harry Reid, both of whom spoke dismissively in recent days of Republican plans for flexibility in administering the cuts. | The move marks a reversal for President Barack Obama and Senate majority leader Harry Reid, both of whom spoke dismissively in recent days of Republican plans for flexibility in administering the cuts. |
Whatever the eventual impact of the spending cuts, the long-running struggle between the parties over deficits soon will shift to rival budgets under preparation by House Republicans and Senate Democrats. | Whatever the eventual impact of the spending cuts, the long-running struggle between the parties over deficits soon will shift to rival budgets under preparation by House Republicans and Senate Democrats. |
Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning. | Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning. |
Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning. Enter your email address to subscribe. | Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning. Enter your email address to subscribe. |
Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox every weekday. |