This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/filmblog/2013/feb/14/mughal-e-azam-reel-history
The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 3 | Version 4 |
|---|---|
| Mughal-e-Azam: royally glossing over history's true colours | Mughal-e-Azam: royally glossing over history's true colours |
| (3 months later) | |
| Mughal-e-Azam (1960) Director: K Asif Entertainment grade: A– History grade: C | Mughal-e-Azam (1960) Director: K Asif Entertainment grade: A– History grade: C |
| See if this film is playing near you | |
| Akbar the Great was emperor of India from 1556-1605, his reign covering approximately the same period as Elizabeth I's in England (1558-1603). | Akbar the Great was emperor of India from 1556-1605, his reign covering approximately the same period as Elizabeth I's in England (1558-1603). |
| Family | Family |
| Longing for a son, the emperor Akbar (Prithviraj Kapoor) treks across the desert to visit a holy man. Soon afterwards, the infant Prince Salim (the future Emperor Jahangir) is born. Looks like somebody didn't pray hard enough. He's a horror. Even as a child, his hobbies are getting drunk and slapping the servants. "Divest him of his mother's tender love and clad him in armour!" cries his father. The little prince is taken off to war to be toughened up. In real life, Salim was a heavy consumer of alcohol and opium, though these habits did not start until he was 18. It is also true that he was brutal: he castrated one servant, beat another to death, and had a writer who wrote nasty things about him flayed alive while he watched. This is why many historians prefer to write about tyrants who are already dead. | Longing for a son, the emperor Akbar (Prithviraj Kapoor) treks across the desert to visit a holy man. Soon afterwards, the infant Prince Salim (the future Emperor Jahangir) is born. Looks like somebody didn't pray hard enough. He's a horror. Even as a child, his hobbies are getting drunk and slapping the servants. "Divest him of his mother's tender love and clad him in armour!" cries his father. The little prince is taken off to war to be toughened up. In real life, Salim was a heavy consumer of alcohol and opium, though these habits did not start until he was 18. It is also true that he was brutal: he castrated one servant, beat another to death, and had a writer who wrote nasty things about him flayed alive while he watched. This is why many historians prefer to write about tyrants who are already dead. |
| Romance | Romance |
| Finally, the adult Salim (now played by Dilip Kumar) is allowed back to the emperor's presence. He's a lot nicer than the real-life Salim, which is fortunate because he is supposed to be the romantic hero, and if he were to keep getting boozed up and beating people to death it might spoil the mood. The court sculptor has been working on a statue. It isn't finished, so a dancing-girl (Madhubala) paints herself the colour of marble and poses in its place. Salim is struck by her beauty, and doesn't even seem too disappointed when she turns out to be alive. Akbar honours her with a new name: Anarkali, meaning pomegranate blossom. He isn't so keen when Salim gets ideas about marrying her. | Finally, the adult Salim (now played by Dilip Kumar) is allowed back to the emperor's presence. He's a lot nicer than the real-life Salim, which is fortunate because he is supposed to be the romantic hero, and if he were to keep getting boozed up and beating people to death it might spoil the mood. The court sculptor has been working on a statue. It isn't finished, so a dancing-girl (Madhubala) paints herself the colour of marble and poses in its place. Salim is struck by her beauty, and doesn't even seem too disappointed when she turns out to be alive. Akbar honours her with a new name: Anarkali, meaning pomegranate blossom. He isn't so keen when Salim gets ideas about marrying her. |
| People | People |
| The story of Anarkali is often regarded as legend, though there are snippets of historical evidence for it. She may have been called Nadira Begum or Sharif-un-Nisa, and was possibly a painter of miniatures and/or a courtesan. The English merchant William Finch, who travelled to the Mughal court in the early 1600s, suggested she was one of Akbar's wives and the mother of Salim's half-brother Prince Daniyal. Mughal-e-Azam explores the oedipal element of this story only in terms of the antagonism between Salim and his parents over who gets to make decisions about Salim's life. This is a perennial Bollywood theme, but here it has a basis in fact. The real Salim led a rebellion against his father, tried to replace him as emperor, and had his friend Abu al-Fazl murdered in 1602. | The story of Anarkali is often regarded as legend, though there are snippets of historical evidence for it. She may have been called Nadira Begum or Sharif-un-Nisa, and was possibly a painter of miniatures and/or a courtesan. The English merchant William Finch, who travelled to the Mughal court in the early 1600s, suggested she was one of Akbar's wives and the mother of Salim's half-brother Prince Daniyal. Mughal-e-Azam explores the oedipal element of this story only in terms of the antagonism between Salim and his parents over who gets to make decisions about Salim's life. This is a perennial Bollywood theme, but here it has a basis in fact. The real Salim led a rebellion against his father, tried to replace him as emperor, and had his friend Abu al-Fazl murdered in 1602. |
| Death | Death |
| The film ascribes Salim's rebellions against his father to his desire to marry Anarkali, which is definitely not historically accurate. Akbar's revenge is to have Anarkali bricked up in a wall. The site on which it is supposed to have happened in Lahore has a tomb on it built during Jahangir's reign. Since Mughal times, the Anarkali tomb has been used as a residence, a parish church and a records office. | The film ascribes Salim's rebellions against his father to his desire to marry Anarkali, which is definitely not historically accurate. Akbar's revenge is to have Anarkali bricked up in a wall. The site on which it is supposed to have happened in Lahore has a tomb on it built during Jahangir's reign. Since Mughal times, the Anarkali tomb has been used as a residence, a parish church and a records office. |
| Film-making | Film-making |
| When Technicolor became available in India, director K Asif wanted to reshoot the whole of Mughal-e-Azam (which in any case was in production for 12 years, on and off). By that point, he had already shot three-quarters of it in black and white, and spent many times the usual budget of a Hindi film. His financiers said no. Asif settled for adding some scenes in colour: notably, the gorgeous sheesh mahal (palace of mirrors) sequence. In 2004, a new version of Mughal-e-Azam was released with the rest of the film retrospectively "colourised" and the entire print restored. The restoration was an improvement. As with many other colourisation projects, though, the fake colours tend to look flat and brash, detracting from cinematographer RD Mathur's elegantly composed shots. | When Technicolor became available in India, director K Asif wanted to reshoot the whole of Mughal-e-Azam (which in any case was in production for 12 years, on and off). By that point, he had already shot three-quarters of it in black and white, and spent many times the usual budget of a Hindi film. His financiers said no. Asif settled for adding some scenes in colour: notably, the gorgeous sheesh mahal (palace of mirrors) sequence. In 2004, a new version of Mughal-e-Azam was released with the rest of the film retrospectively "colourised" and the entire print restored. The restoration was an improvement. As with many other colourisation projects, though, the fake colours tend to look flat and brash, detracting from cinematographer RD Mathur's elegantly composed shots. |
| Verdict | Verdict |
| Mughal-e-Azam is a landmark of cinema, even if its version of history is only slightly more realistic than its new colours. | Mughal-e-Azam is a landmark of cinema, even if its version of history is only slightly more realistic than its new colours. |
| Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning. | Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning. |