This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2013/jan/15/teachers-pay-performance-michael-gove

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Teachers' pay rises to be based on performance, Michael Gove confirms Teachers' pay rises to be based on performance, Michael Gove confirms
(about 1 hour later)
Teachers will have their pay decided on the basis of perceived performance rather than length of service from this September, the education secretary, Michael Gove, has confirmed. Performance-related pay for teachers will begin from September, the education secretary, Michael Gove, has confirmed, a move unions warned would demoralise the profession and be as likely to produce salary cuts as increases.
In December Gove said he was minded to accept recommendations from the School Teachers' Review Body (STRB) that headteachers be given more freedom on deciding pay, something he argued would reward good staff and help schools in disadvantaged areas recruit and keep good staff. The idea was cautiously welcomed by headteachers but condemned as divisive by unions representing ordinary teachers. Gove said late last year he was minded to accept recommendations from the School Teachers' Review Body (STRB) that headteachers be given more freedom on deciding pay, something he argued would reward good staff and help schools in disadvantaged areas recruit and keep the best teachers. A final decision was delayed pending a consultation period for unions and others to submit their views on the idea.
Following a consultation period Gove has written to Dame Patricia Hodgson, the chair of the STRB, to confirm the change, which will affect schools in England and Wales. Gove has now written to Dame Patricia Hodgson, the chair of the STRB, to confirm the change, which will affect schools in England and Wales.
He wrote: "I am clear that these changes will give schools greater freedom to develop pay policies that are tailored to their school's needs and circumstances and to reward their teachers in line with their performance." He wrote: "I am clear that these changes will give schools greater freedom to develop pay policies that are tailored to their school's needs and circumstances and to reward their teachers in line with their performance." There was, he added, "further work to be done" in deciding the best way to implement the recommendations.
There was, he added, "further work to be done" in deciding the best way to implement the recommendations. The new system will end teachers' automatic progression to new national pay points according to length of service, linking it instead to annual appraisals, as happens already with some senior staff. While the wider pay bands will be maintained as a general reference, the set points between them will be abolished, with heads given the power to choose what within the scale a teacher is paid. Higher pay bands for London and surrounding areas will be kept in place.
The new system will end teachers' automatic progression to new national pay points according to length of service, linking it instead to annual appraisals, as happens already with some senior staff. The NASUWT teachers' union called the consultation a "sham", pointing to a gap of just six days between the deadline for submissions and Gove's decision.
While the wider pay bands will be maintained as a general reference the set points between them will be abolished, with heads given the power to choose where within the scale a teacher is paid. Higher pay bands for London and surrounding areas will be kept in place. The union's general secretary, Chris Keates, said: "From now on the only pay existing teachers can expect is the salary they are on. New entrants to the profession can aspire no higher than their starting salary.
The STRB's report followed a Department for Education commission to look at ways pay could be changed to improve teaching performance and help schools in some areas attract and keep staff. "At a time of severe economic austerity and where there is already stark evidence that schools are using existing pay flexibilities to deny teachers pay progression however well they perform, the claim that these recommendations will result in good teachers being paid more is risible."
Its recommendations were condemned by the NUT and NASUWT unions, which between them represent around 90% of teachers. They argue that predictable pay scales are one of the main attractions for new entrants to the profession. The other main teaching union, the NUT, which with the NASUWT represents around 90% of rank-and-file teachers, has argued that predictable pay scales are one of the main attractions for new entrants to the profession.
In her union's formal submission to the STRB after its report, the general secretary of the NASUWT, Chris Keates, called the proposals "quite simply reckless", arguing there was no evidence change was needed and that without extra funding the new scheme was likely to be used to reduce salaries so heads could balance budgets. Christine Blower, general secretary of the NUT, said: "Some 25,000 schools deciding their own pay structures is a real distraction from the teaching and learning that should be the focus of schools' work. Individual pay decisions will result in unfairness and less mobility in the teacher job market."
In their responses the National Association of Head Teachers (NAHT) and Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL) gave a qualified welcome to the plan but warned that it needed considerable planning and should not be rushed through, with the NAHT's general secretary, Russell Hobby, calling some of the STRB's ideas "too far, too soon". She added that performance-related pay was "fundamentally inappropriate" for teaching. "Contrary to Department for Education claims, there is no evidence that linking pay to performance increases results."
He said: "We accept that basing pay progression on performance would bring classroom teachers into line with both headteachers, where it already operates, and with most other sectors. While the two main unions representing headteachers and other senior staff, the National Association of Head Teachers (NAHT) and Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL), broadly support the change, they warn that it needs considerable planning and should not be rushed through.
"To get the best from the new system, however, it must be introduced sensitively and contain a strong emphasis on professional development. For teachers to understand that this is a constructive process that works in their interest as well as pupils', it must not be based on crude targets. Nor should it be implemented in a rush without adequate training being given to school leaders and governors who will be monitoring staff progress and sometimes having to make difficult decisions and judgments." In the NAHT's submission to the STRB, the union's general secretary, Russell Hobby, called some of the ideas "too far, too soon". He said: "We accept that basing pay progression on performance would bring classroom teachers into line with both headteachers, where it already operates, and with most other sectors.
"To get the best from the new system, however, it must be introduced sensitively and contain a strong emphasis on professional development. For teachers to understand that this is a constructive process that works in their interest as well as pupils', it must not be based on crude targets.
"Nor should it be implemented in a rush without adequate training being given to school leaders and governors who will be monitoring staff progress and sometimes having to make difficult decisions and judgments."
Gove said: "These recommendations will make teaching a more attractive career and a more rewarding job. They will give schools greater flexibility to respond to specific conditions and reward their best teachers.
"It is vital that teachers can be paid more without having to leave the classroom. This will be particularly important to schools in the most disadvantaged areas as it will empower them to attract and recruit the best teachers."