This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/business/6925397.stm

The article has changed 21 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 12 Version 13
BA gets £121.5m price-fixing fine BA's price-fix fine reaches £270m
(about 1 hour later)
British Airways has been fined a record £121.5m by the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) after it admitted colluding to fix the prices of fuel surcharges. British Airways has been fined some £270m after it admitted collusion in fixing the prices of fuel surcharges.
BA held illegal talks with rival Virgin Atlantic over the charges, which were added to passenger fares in response to rising oil prices. The US Department of Justice has fined it $300m (£148m) for colluding on how much extra to charge on passenger and cargo flights, to cover fuel costs.
But Virgin has been given immunity after it reported the collusion and is not expected to be fined, the OFT said. It followed a decision by the UK's Office of Fair Trading to fine BA £121.5m, after it held illegal talks with rival Virgin Atlantic.
BA will also face a fine from the US Department of Justice (DoJ) later. Surcharges were added to passenger fares in response to rising oil prices.
Anti-competitive behaviour is entirely unacceptable and we condemn it unreservedly Willie Walsh, BA chief executive class="" href="/1/hi/business/5105454.stm">Q&A: BA price-fixing probe class="" href="http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/fds/hi/business/market_data/shares/3/23417/intraday.stm">Check BA's share price Virgin has been given immunity after it reported the collusion and is not expected to be fined, the OFT said.
BA said in May that it had set aside £350m to cover fines and the costs of legal action.
The OFT and the DoJ began investigating BA's price-fixing in June 2006.The OFT and the DoJ began investigating BA's price-fixing in June 2006.
And the airline said in May that it had set aside £350m to cover fines and the costs of legal action. Anti-competitive behaviour is entirely unacceptable and we condemn it unreservedly Willie Walsh, BA chief executive class="" href="/1/hi/business/5105454.stm">Q&A: BA price-fixing probe class="" href="http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/fds/hi/business/market_data/shares/3/23417/intraday.stm">Check BA's share price
The fines will end the civil case against BA, but a criminal investigation is still continuing, and the OFT said no conclusions could be drawn about whether charges against individuals would be brought.The fines will end the civil case against BA, but a criminal investigation is still continuing, and the OFT said no conclusions could be drawn about whether charges against individuals would be brought.
Last October, BA's commercial director, Martin George, and communications chief, Iain Burns - who had been on leave of absence since the inquiry began - quit the company.Last October, BA's commercial director, Martin George, and communications chief, Iain Burns - who had been on leave of absence since the inquiry began - quit the company.
'Important message''Important message'
BA had colluded with Virgin Atlantic on at least six occasions between August 2004 and January 2006, the OFT said. During that time, surcharges rose from £5 to £60 per ticket.BA had colluded with Virgin Atlantic on at least six occasions between August 2004 and January 2006, the OFT said. During that time, surcharges rose from £5 to £60 per ticket.
It makes for quite rough justice, since - on BA's account - Virgin was a willing participant in this shameful attempt to rig the market Robert PestonBBC Business Editor Read Robert Peston's blogIt makes for quite rough justice, since - on BA's account - Virgin was a willing participant in this shameful attempt to rig the market Robert PestonBBC Business Editor Read Robert Peston's blog
BA's chief executive Willie Walsh said that passengers had not been overcharged because fuel surcharges were "a legitimate way of recovering costs".BA's chief executive Willie Walsh said that passengers had not been overcharged because fuel surcharges were "a legitimate way of recovering costs".
However, he acknowledged that the conduct of some of the carrier's employees had been wrong and could not be excused.However, he acknowledged that the conduct of some of the carrier's employees had been wrong and could not be excused.
"Anti-competitive behaviour is entirely unacceptable and we condemn it unreservedly," Mr Walsh said."Anti-competitive behaviour is entirely unacceptable and we condemn it unreservedly," Mr Walsh said.
"We have a long-standing competition compliance policy which requires all staff to comply with the law at all times."We have a long-standing competition compliance policy which requires all staff to comply with the law at all times.
"I am satisfied that we have the right controls in place. However, it is deeply regrettable that some individuals ignored our policy.""I am satisfied that we have the right controls in place. However, it is deeply regrettable that some individuals ignored our policy."
'Blatant breach''Blatant breach'
OFT chairman Philip Collins said that the hefty fine would "send an important message" to companies and business leaders about its intention to enforce the law.OFT chairman Philip Collins said that the hefty fine would "send an important message" to companies and business leaders about its intention to enforce the law.
This serves to remind companies of the substantial risks involved if they are found to engage in such behaviour Philip CollinsChairman, OFTThis serves to remind companies of the substantial risks involved if they are found to engage in such behaviour Philip CollinsChairman, OFT
"This serves to remind companies of the substantial risks involved if they are found to engage in such behaviour," he said."This serves to remind companies of the substantial risks involved if they are found to engage in such behaviour," he said.
Virgin Atlantic said that it had informed the OFT as soon as its lawyers were made aware of the nature of contacts that had occurred between individuals from the two airlines.Virgin Atlantic said that it had informed the OFT as soon as its lawyers were made aware of the nature of contacts that had occurred between individuals from the two airlines.
"We take complying with competition laws extremely seriously and regret that contacts were made between the two companies," it said."We take complying with competition laws extremely seriously and regret that contacts were made between the two companies," it said.
"As a criminal investigation is continuing, we are unable to give further details until the regulators publish their full findings.""As a criminal investigation is continuing, we are unable to give further details until the regulators publish their full findings."
BBC business editor Robert Peston said that the collusion between BA and Virgin Atlantic was "as blatant a breach of competition law as it's possible to imagine".BBC business editor Robert Peston said that the collusion between BA and Virgin Atlantic was "as blatant a breach of competition law as it's possible to imagine".
"This was not a careless accident. The two big birds... were not competing properly on price over an extended period: they were giving each other comfort that they would not undercut each other on the fuel surcharge.""This was not a careless accident. The two big birds... were not competing properly on price over an extended period: they were giving each other comfort that they would not undercut each other on the fuel surcharge."
He added: "Virgin won't pay a penny in fines and actually emerges as a winner, since all the opprobrium of the rule-breach has been heaped on BA."He added: "Virgin won't pay a penny in fines and actually emerges as a winner, since all the opprobrium of the rule-breach has been heaped on BA."