This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/nov/08/leveson-inquiry-curb-press-excesses-tories
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 1 | Version 2 |
|---|---|
| Leveson inquiry: state role required to curb press excesses, Tories urge PM | |
| (about 1 hour later) | |
| An influential group of mainstream Tories, including four former cabinet ministers, have opened the door to a limited form of statutory press regulation, warning that proposals being put forward by the newspaper industry "risk being an unstable model destined to fail". | An influential group of mainstream Tories, including four former cabinet ministers, have opened the door to a limited form of statutory press regulation, warning that proposals being put forward by the newspaper industry "risk being an unstable model destined to fail". |
| The letter, published in the Guardian and signed by 42 MPs and two peers, signals a potential shift in the politics of media regulation because it is the first suggestion that the Conservative party is not going to respond to the Leveson inquiry with a monolithic opposition to legal regulation of the industry. Lord Justice Leveson is due to publish the inquiry's findings at the end of this month and ferocious lobbying of No 10 is under way from both sides in the argument. | The letter, published in the Guardian and signed by 42 MPs and two peers, signals a potential shift in the politics of media regulation because it is the first suggestion that the Conservative party is not going to respond to the Leveson inquiry with a monolithic opposition to legal regulation of the industry. Lord Justice Leveson is due to publish the inquiry's findings at the end of this month and ferocious lobbying of No 10 is under way from both sides in the argument. |
| The signatories believe their letter may show Downing Street that a crossparty consensus on media reform is possible at Westminster. "No one wants our media controlled by the government but, to be credible, any new regulator must be independent of the press as well as from politicians," the letter says. | The signatories believe their letter may show Downing Street that a crossparty consensus on media reform is possible at Westminster. "No one wants our media controlled by the government but, to be credible, any new regulator must be independent of the press as well as from politicians," the letter says. |
| "We are concerned that the current proposal put forward by the newspaper industry would lack independence and risks being an unstable model destined to fail, like previous initiatives over the past 60 years ". | "We are concerned that the current proposal put forward by the newspaper industry would lack independence and risks being an unstable model destined to fail, like previous initiatives over the past 60 years ". |
| Labour and the Liberal Democrats are likely to support Leveson if he suggests the newspaper industry cannot continue to be entirely self-regulated. The letter suggests that David Cameron has greater room for political manoeuvre at Westminster than thought. | Labour and the Liberal Democrats are likely to support Leveson if he suggests the newspaper industry cannot continue to be entirely self-regulated. The letter suggests that David Cameron has greater room for political manoeuvre at Westminster than thought. |
| Senior cabinet ministers, including the education secretary Michael Gove and the communities secretary Eric Pickles, oppose any form of state-backed regulation of the press. George Osborne, the chancellor, is also reluctant to see any state intervention. | Senior cabinet ministers, including the education secretary Michael Gove and the communities secretary Eric Pickles, oppose any form of state-backed regulation of the press. George Osborne, the chancellor, is also reluctant to see any state intervention. |
| Cameron has been trying to keep his options open, saying the status quo is not an option and any new formula has to be justifiable to the victims of phone hacking. But he is under pressure to support a newspaper industry proposal that would preserve self-regulation and rely on legally enforceable contracts to bind publishers to the system, including the possibility of fines. Similar pressure has been applied to the Labour leader, Ed Miliband, but it is understood he still stands by the evidence he gave to the Leveson inquiry. | Cameron has been trying to keep his options open, saying the status quo is not an option and any new formula has to be justifiable to the victims of phone hacking. But he is under pressure to support a newspaper industry proposal that would preserve self-regulation and rely on legally enforceable contracts to bind publishers to the system, including the possibility of fines. Similar pressure has been applied to the Labour leader, Ed Miliband, but it is understood he still stands by the evidence he gave to the Leveson inquiry. |
| Signatories to the Conservative letter include the former foreign secretary Sir Malcolm Rifkind, two former party chairmen Caroline Spelman and Lord Fowler, as well as the former chief whip Lord Ryder. It is also supported by a range of Conservative backbench opinion from rightwingers such as Gerald Howarth, Jesse Norman and Robert Buckland, a joint secretary of the 1922 backbench commitee. Supporters also include Cameron's former press secretary George Eustice, Zac Goldsmith, Andrea Leadsom, Nicholas Soames, and Gavin Barwell, the parliamentary aide to Gove. | Signatories to the Conservative letter include the former foreign secretary Sir Malcolm Rifkind, two former party chairmen Caroline Spelman and Lord Fowler, as well as the former chief whip Lord Ryder. It is also supported by a range of Conservative backbench opinion from rightwingers such as Gerald Howarth, Jesse Norman and Robert Buckland, a joint secretary of the 1922 backbench commitee. Supporters also include Cameron's former press secretary George Eustice, Zac Goldsmith, Andrea Leadsom, Nicholas Soames, and Gavin Barwell, the parliamentary aide to Gove. |
| The aim of the letter, according to one of the instigators, is to break what is described as the siege of Downing Street by the newspaper industry, and forge a safe passage for the prime minister so he can engage with the Leveson inquiry recommendations. | The aim of the letter, according to one of the instigators, is to break what is described as the siege of Downing Street by the newspaper industry, and forge a safe passage for the prime minister so he can engage with the Leveson inquiry recommendations. |
| It was being emphasised that the letter was not prescriptive, but an attempt to change the tone of the debate, so it is not dominated by the press or by campaigners against Rupert Murdoch. | It was being emphasised that the letter was not prescriptive, but an attempt to change the tone of the debate, so it is not dominated by the press or by campaigners against Rupert Murdoch. |
| The signatories say they "agree with the prime minister that obsessive argument about the principle of statutory regulation can cloud the debate". However, they add that forms of statutory regulation in broadcasting and sensitive professions such as the law have proved workable. | The signatories say they "agree with the prime minister that obsessive argument about the principle of statutory regulation can cloud the debate". However, they add that forms of statutory regulation in broadcasting and sensitive professions such as the law have proved workable. |
| They write: "We should keep some perspective - the introduction of the Legal Services Board in statute has not compromised the independence of the legal profession. The Jimmy Savile scandal was exposed by ITV and the Winterbourne View care home scandal was exposed by the BBC, both of whom are regulated by the Broadcasting Act. | They write: "We should keep some perspective - the introduction of the Legal Services Board in statute has not compromised the independence of the legal profession. The Jimmy Savile scandal was exposed by ITV and the Winterbourne View care home scandal was exposed by the BBC, both of whom are regulated by the Broadcasting Act. |
| While no one is suggesting similar laws for newspapers, it is not credible to suggest that broadcasters such as Sky News, ITV or the BBC have their agendas dictated by the government of the day." | While no one is suggesting similar laws for newspapers, it is not credible to suggest that broadcasters such as Sky News, ITV or the BBC have their agendas dictated by the government of the day." |
| They call for greater clarity about a future public interest test for the publication of stories. The "worst excesses of the press have stemmed from the fact that the public interest test has been too elastic and too often has meant what editors wanted it to mean. To protect both robust journalism and the public, it is now essential to establish a single standard for assessing the public interest test which can be applied independently and consistently". | They call for greater clarity about a future public interest test for the publication of stories. The "worst excesses of the press have stemmed from the fact that the public interest test has been too elastic and too often has meant what editors wanted it to mean. To protect both robust journalism and the public, it is now essential to establish a single standard for assessing the public interest test which can be applied independently and consistently". |
| The instigators of the letter stressed they were not acting with the covert agreement of No 10, although officials are now aware of the move. One source said: "As Conservatives, we are reluctant regulators and we firmly believe in a free press, and want to help newspapers survive, but they have to meet us half way. Their refusal to countenance any kind of statutory change to raise standards is no longer acceptable to the Conservative party." | The instigators of the letter stressed they were not acting with the covert agreement of No 10, although officials are now aware of the move. One source said: "As Conservatives, we are reluctant regulators and we firmly believe in a free press, and want to help newspapers survive, but they have to meet us half way. Their refusal to countenance any kind of statutory change to raise standards is no longer acceptable to the Conservative party." |
| The source said they could incorporate some of the proposals put forward by the industry, led by Lord Hunt and Lord Black, the peers behind proposals for a beefed-up Press Complaints Commission. | The source said they could incorporate some of the proposals put forward by the industry, led by Lord Hunt and Lord Black, the peers behind proposals for a beefed-up Press Complaints Commission. |
| One source said the mood in the party had hardened in recent months claiming what he described as "the drip, drip of press stories intended to undermine Lord Leveson's inquiry have not gone down well among some MPs". | One source said the mood in the party had hardened in recent months claiming what he described as "the drip, drip of press stories intended to undermine Lord Leveson's inquiry have not gone down well among some MPs". |
| Apart from the merits of a form of statutory underpinning to independent regulation, it was also being suggested that Cameron might find himself in the uncomfortable position of defending a newspaper industry at a time when difficult revelations emerge in court cases. | Apart from the merits of a form of statutory underpinning to independent regulation, it was also being suggested that Cameron might find himself in the uncomfortable position of defending a newspaper industry at a time when difficult revelations emerge in court cases. |
| A legislative slot has been reserved for the next parliament, but it is also possible that Leveson will be asked to give evidence to the culture select committee once his report is published. | A legislative slot has been reserved for the next parliament, but it is also possible that Leveson will be asked to give evidence to the culture select committee once his report is published. |
| It also emerged that Fowler is to set up an all-party media parliamentary group probably with former newpsaper proprietor Lord Hollick. | It also emerged that Fowler is to set up an all-party media parliamentary group probably with former newpsaper proprietor Lord Hollick. |