This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/28/world/asia/chinese-premiers-family-disputes-article-on-riches.html

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Chinese Premier’s Family Disputes Article on Riches Chinese Premier’s Family Disputes Article on Riches
(35 minutes later)
HONG KONG — Two lawyers who said they represented the family of Prime Minister Wen Jiabao of China have issued a statement disputing aspects of a New York Times article about the family’s wealth, a rare instance of a powerful Chinese political family responding directly to a foreign media report.HONG KONG — Two lawyers who said they represented the family of Prime Minister Wen Jiabao of China have issued a statement disputing aspects of a New York Times article about the family’s wealth, a rare instance of a powerful Chinese political family responding directly to a foreign media report.
The statement, published in The South China Morning Post on Sunday, said, “The so-called ‘hidden riches’ of Wen Jiabao’s family members in The New York Times’s report” did not exist.The statement, published in The South China Morning Post on Sunday, said, “The so-called ‘hidden riches’ of Wen Jiabao’s family members in The New York Times’s report” did not exist.
After criticizing several points in the article, the statement hinted at the possibility of future legal action. “We will continue to make clarifications regarding untrue reports by The New York Times, and reserve the right to hold it legally responsible,” the statement said.After criticizing several points in the article, the statement hinted at the possibility of future legal action. “We will continue to make clarifications regarding untrue reports by The New York Times, and reserve the right to hold it legally responsible,” the statement said.
The statement reported in The Post, a Hong Kong newspaper, has not been obtained directly by The Times.The statement reported in The Post, a Hong Kong newspaper, has not been obtained directly by The Times.
The statement was not a sweeping denial of the article. The statement clearly acknowledged that some family members are active in business and that they “are responsible for all their own business activities.”The statement was not a sweeping denial of the article. The statement clearly acknowledged that some family members are active in business and that they “are responsible for all their own business activities.”
While the statement disputed that Mr. Wen’s mother had held assets, it did not address the calculation in the article that the family had controlled assets worth at least $2.7 billion.While the statement disputed that Mr. Wen’s mother had held assets, it did not address the calculation in the article that the family had controlled assets worth at least $2.7 billion.
Eileen Murphy, a spokeswoman for The Times, expressed confidence in the article. “We are standing by our story, which we are incredibly proud of and which is an example of the quality investigative journalism The Times is known for,” she wrote in an e-mail.Eileen Murphy, a spokeswoman for The Times, expressed confidence in the article. “We are standing by our story, which we are incredibly proud of and which is an example of the quality investigative journalism The Times is known for,” she wrote in an e-mail.
The statement represents an unusual move for the family of a senior Chinese leader. When Bloomberg News published an article in late June describing real estate and other assets held by the family of Vice President Xi Jinping, his family did not issue a public statement.The statement represents an unusual move for the family of a senior Chinese leader. When Bloomberg News published an article in late June describing real estate and other assets held by the family of Vice President Xi Jinping, his family did not issue a public statement.
The statement published in The Post was attributed to Bai Tao, a partner in the Beijing office of the Jun He Law Firm, and Wang Weidong, the managing partner of the Beijing office of the Grandall Law Firm.The statement published in The Post was attributed to Bai Tao, a partner in the Beijing office of the Jun He Law Firm, and Wang Weidong, the managing partner of the Beijing office of the Grandall Law Firm.
No one answered phone calls to both lawyers’ offices on Sunday, nor did Mr. Wang respond immediately to an e-mail.No one answered phone calls to both lawyers’ offices on Sunday, nor did Mr. Wang respond immediately to an e-mail.
The statement denied an anecdote in The Times article that described how one investment in the name of Mr. Wen’s mother, Yang Zhiyun, was worth $120 million five years ago. “The mother of Wen Jiabao, except receiving salary/pension according to the regulation, has never had any income or property,” the statement said.The statement denied an anecdote in The Times article that described how one investment in the name of Mr. Wen’s mother, Yang Zhiyun, was worth $120 million five years ago. “The mother of Wen Jiabao, except receiving salary/pension according to the regulation, has never had any income or property,” the statement said.
The Times article cited “corporate and regulatory records” as the source for the reporting on Ms. Yang and said that her identification number appeared on documents showing the holding in an insurance company.
Corporate registration records reviewed by The Times showed that in 2007 the prime minister’s 90-year-old mother held about $120 million worth of Ping An shares through investment vehicles. A signature bearing her name and her government-issued identity card were included in the filing, which was obtained from government regulatory filings.Corporate registration records reviewed by The Times showed that in 2007 the prime minister’s 90-year-old mother held about $120 million worth of Ping An shares through investment vehicles. A signature bearing her name and her government-issued identity card were included in the filing, which was obtained from government regulatory filings.
The statement also said that some members of Mr. Wen’s family had not engaged in business while others “were engaged in business activities, but they did not carry out any illegal business activity. They do not hold shares of any companies.”The statement also said that some members of Mr. Wen’s family had not engaged in business while others “were engaged in business activities, but they did not carry out any illegal business activity. They do not hold shares of any companies.”
The statement also said that Mr. Wen had not been involved in those activities. “Wen Jiabao has never played any role in the business activities of his family members, still less has he allowed his family members’ business activities to have any influence on his formulation and execution of policies.”The statement also said that Mr. Wen had not been involved in those activities. “Wen Jiabao has never played any role in the business activities of his family members, still less has he allowed his family members’ business activities to have any influence on his formulation and execution of policies.”
The Times article did not allege any illegal business activity, and it pointed out that Mr. Wen did not appear to have accumulated assets. The article also said that there was no evidence that Mr. Wen personally intervened to help family members’ investments.The Times article did not allege any illegal business activity, and it pointed out that Mr. Wen did not appear to have accumulated assets. The article also said that there was no evidence that Mr. Wen personally intervened to help family members’ investments.
The article pointed out that as prime minister in a country where the state plays a large role in the economy, Mr. Wen oversaw many government officials whose decisions could play a large role in the fortunes of businesses and investors.The article pointed out that as prime minister in a country where the state plays a large role in the economy, Mr. Wen oversaw many government officials whose decisions could play a large role in the fortunes of businesses and investors.
Hong Lei, the spokesman for China’s foreign ministry, criticized the article on Friday during a briefing, saying that it “smears China and has ulterior motives.”Hong Lei, the spokesman for China’s foreign ministry, criticized the article on Friday during a briefing, saying that it “smears China and has ulterior motives.”
The Times posted the article in English on Friday, and in Chinese three hours later, after final edits in English were translated. The Chinese government quickly blocked access from mainland Chinese computers to the Chinese-language and English-language Web sites of The New York Times before the article was posted in Chinese.The Times posted the article in English on Friday, and in Chinese three hours later, after final edits in English were translated. The Chinese government quickly blocked access from mainland Chinese computers to the Chinese-language and English-language Web sites of The New York Times before the article was posted in Chinese.
But many people in China appear to have used virtual private networks to view the article anyway.But many people in China appear to have used virtual private networks to view the article anyway.