This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/england/london/6918898.stm

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Woman cleared of judge blackmail Woman cleared of judge blackmail
(30 minutes later)
A cleaner has been cleared of stealing two sex videos from a male judge and blackmailing a female judge.A cleaner has been cleared of stealing two sex videos from a male judge and blackmailing a female judge.
Roselane Driza, 37, was jailed for 33 months in October 2006 after being convicted of blackmail and theft.Roselane Driza, 37, was jailed for 33 months in October 2006 after being convicted of blackmail and theft.
She later won an appeal against her convictions and was told she faced a retrial which was due to begin next month. She later won an appeal against her convictions and was told she faced a retrial due to begin next month.
But at a pre-trial hearing at the Old Bailey the Crown Prosecution Service decided not to proceed with the case. But at a pre-trial hearing the Crown Prosecution Service said it has decided not to proceed with the case as the two judges were too ill to give evidence.
Brazilian Ms Driza, of South Norwood, south London, was sentenced last October for stealing videos from her lover, Judge Mohammed Ilyas Khan, and for blackmailing a female judge, known as Judge J, for £20,000. Brazilian Miss Driza, of South Norwood, south London, was sentenced last October for stealing videos from her lover, Judge Mohammed Ilyas Khan, and for blackmailing a female judge, known as Judge J, for £20,000.
But on appeal she was cleared of blackmailing 61-year-old Judge Khan, with whom she had an affair and had been living with until her arrest.But on appeal she was cleared of blackmailing 61-year-old Judge Khan, with whom she had an affair and had been living with until her arrest.
Justice has been done Roselane DrizaJustice has been done Roselane Driza
The exact grounds for appeal cannot be reported except that it was on the basis of new evidence.The exact grounds for appeal cannot be reported except that it was on the basis of new evidence.
Both judges had both been employing Driza illegally. Both judges had been employing Driza illegally.
Following the first trial, an investigation was ordered into the behaviour of the immigration judges by the Office of Judicial Complaints. The Office for Judicial Complaints, which has been investigating the behaviour of the two immigration judges, said the dropping of the charges would prompt a review of the case.
After Friday's hearing at the old Bailey, Miss Driza said outside court : "Justice has been done. I am very happy and very proud of God." After Friday's hearing at the old Bailey, Miss Driza said outside court: "Justice has been done. I am very happy and very proud of God."
Visa application
She added she is no longer a cleaner and has been unemployed for two years while her visa application is considered by the home office.She added she is no longer a cleaner and has been unemployed for two years while her visa application is considered by the home office.
Her counsel, Frances Oldham QC told the court: "Miss Driza has been vilified by the Crown as a blackmailer.Her counsel, Frances Oldham QC told the court: "Miss Driza has been vilified by the Crown as a blackmailer.
"She has never accepted that she is anything other than innocent of these matters.""She has never accepted that she is anything other than innocent of these matters."
Earlier prosecution told the court that there had been "a number of significant developments in this case". He said both prosecution witnesses, J and Judge Khan, have been ill and there is no prospect of them taking the stand "at a trial in August or possibly ever".
It said both prosecution witnesses, J and Judge Khan, have both been ill and there is nor prospect of them taking the stand "at a trial in August or possibly ever." Judge Martin Stephens said the order banning identification of the woman Judge J must remain despite Miss Driza's counsel asking for it to be lifted.
Asked by the judge if the decision not to proceed had been made from medical evidence, the prosecution said: "Yes, from medical material."