This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/19/world/europe/11-foreign-ministers-call-for-greater-european-union-integration.html

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
11 European Foreign Ministers Call for Greater Integration 11 European Foreign Ministers Call for Greater Integration
(about 1 hour later)
LONDON — Testing the theory that it often takes a crisis to bring Europeans together, 11 foreign ministers, led by Guido Westerwelle of Germany, have called for a big increase in economic, political, diplomatic and even military integration within the European Union.LONDON — Testing the theory that it often takes a crisis to bring Europeans together, 11 foreign ministers, led by Guido Westerwelle of Germany, have called for a big increase in economic, political, diplomatic and even military integration within the European Union.
The report, issued Monday by the Future of Europe Group at a meeting in Warsaw, outlines far-reaching proposals for a Europe weighed down by debt, mired in an economic slowdown and struggling to save its single currency. However, the report acknowledges that only some of the 11 ministers agreed with ideas like the eventual creation of a European army.The report, issued Monday by the Future of Europe Group at a meeting in Warsaw, outlines far-reaching proposals for a Europe weighed down by debt, mired in an economic slowdown and struggling to save its single currency. However, the report acknowledges that only some of the 11 ministers agreed with ideas like the eventual creation of a European army.
Nevertheless, the fact that the foreign minister of the European Union’s most powerful nation, Germany, was its prime mover gives the nine-page document political significance. Nevertheless, the fact that the foreign minister of the European Union’s most powerful nation, Germany, was the report’s prime mover gives the nine-page document political significance.
Germany has argued consistently for a more federal Europe, a point of tension with its closest partner, France, which tends to be more protective of sovereignty and preoccupied with shorter-term measures to stabilize the euro.Germany has argued consistently for a more federal Europe, a point of tension with its closest partner, France, which tends to be more protective of sovereignty and preoccupied with shorter-term measures to stabilize the euro.
Highlighting the difficulties confronting the European Union, the document notes, “In many parts of Europe, nationalism and populism are on the rise, while the feeling of solidarity and sense of belonging in Europe are dwindling.”Highlighting the difficulties confronting the European Union, the document notes, “In many parts of Europe, nationalism and populism are on the rise, while the feeling of solidarity and sense of belonging in Europe are dwindling.”
Its answer is more, not less, Europe.Its answer is more, not less, Europe.
In the economic sphere, the document suggests more European oversight over the budgets of national governments, a single supervisory mechanism for euro zone banks involving the European Central Bank, and more powers for the European Parliament. It adds that the euro zone’s bailout fund should become a European Monetary Fund.In the economic sphere, the document suggests more European oversight over the budgets of national governments, a single supervisory mechanism for euro zone banks involving the European Central Bank, and more powers for the European Parliament. It adds that the euro zone’s bailout fund should become a European Monetary Fund.
How seriously the specific suggestions should be taken is difficult to judge, particularly since Mr. Westerwelle comes from a minority party in the German coalition, rather than the center-right party of Chancellor Angela Merkel.How seriously the specific suggestions should be taken is difficult to judge, particularly since Mr. Westerwelle comes from a minority party in the German coalition, rather than the center-right party of Chancellor Angela Merkel.
“Germany’s renewal of the concept of political union reflects the fact that the German political class has become more integrationist as the euro crisis has progressed,” said Charles Grant, director of the Center for European Reform. “But what their partners want to know is whether the Germans are really serious about believing in a more integrated Europe, or whether calling for more Europe is an emotional response — a sort of Pavlovian reaction — to the difficulties they are in.”“Germany’s renewal of the concept of political union reflects the fact that the German political class has become more integrationist as the euro crisis has progressed,” said Charles Grant, director of the Center for European Reform. “But what their partners want to know is whether the Germans are really serious about believing in a more integrated Europe, or whether calling for more Europe is an emotional response — a sort of Pavlovian reaction — to the difficulties they are in.”
The foreign ministers of all of the European Union’s big members took part in the Future of Europe Group meeting, with the exception of Britain, which remains resolutely skeptical about further integration. Poland, which joined the European Union in 2004, played an active role, and the 11 participants included representatives of the six countries that started the process of European integration after World War II.The foreign ministers of all of the European Union’s big members took part in the Future of Europe Group meeting, with the exception of Britain, which remains resolutely skeptical about further integration. Poland, which joined the European Union in 2004, played an active role, and the 11 participants included representatives of the six countries that started the process of European integration after World War II.
Critics believe that some countries may have participated simply to monitor what others were saying. But the report, signed by Austria, Denmark, Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Poland, the Netherlands, Portugal, Belgium and Luxembourg, reflects the rising temperature of the debate over the future of Europe.Critics believe that some countries may have participated simply to monitor what others were saying. But the report, signed by Austria, Denmark, Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Poland, the Netherlands, Portugal, Belgium and Luxembourg, reflects the rising temperature of the debate over the future of Europe.

This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:

This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:

Correction: September 18, 2012Correction: September 18, 2012

An earlier version of this article misstated the number of foreign ministers who signed the report. Eleven did so, not nine. The same error appeared in the headline.

An earlier version of this article misstated the number of foreign ministers who signed the report. Eleven did so, not nine. The same error appeared in the headline.