This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2012/aug/15/legislation-not-will-tackle-dangerous-dogs
The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 1 | Version 2 |
|---|---|
| We have the legislation, but not the will, to tackle dangerous dogs | We have the legislation, but not the will, to tackle dangerous dogs |
| (about 1 month later) | |
| The RSPCA's emphasis on people rather than dogs being the problem in dog attacks echoes the mantra of the gun lobby (Dog attacks rise across England, 10 August). Until we crack the problem of human behaviour, dogs which are bred, bought and brandished specifically for their aggression are every bit as dangerous as guns – and should be controlled in the same way. It would appear that successive governments may have shown little interest in controlling dangerous dogs because attacks are generally confined to working-class areas. People in these areas need real protection, not more useless lectures about how it's the owner's fault. Peter McKenna Liverpool | The RSPCA's emphasis on people rather than dogs being the problem in dog attacks echoes the mantra of the gun lobby (Dog attacks rise across England, 10 August). Until we crack the problem of human behaviour, dogs which are bred, bought and brandished specifically for their aggression are every bit as dangerous as guns – and should be controlled in the same way. It would appear that successive governments may have shown little interest in controlling dangerous dogs because attacks are generally confined to working-class areas. People in these areas need real protection, not more useless lectures about how it's the owner's fault. Peter McKenna Liverpool |
| • During my career as a crown prosecutor I saw too many photos of adults and children with scars from attacks by large-toothed dogs. The dogs were sometimes put down after the incident; the adults often showed inadequate awareness of the danger their animals presented. Some of the dogs, although not of the types prohibited under section 1 of the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991, were kept for their aggressiveness. | • During my career as a crown prosecutor I saw too many photos of adults and children with scars from attacks by large-toothed dogs. The dogs were sometimes put down after the incident; the adults often showed inadequate awareness of the danger their animals presented. Some of the dogs, although not of the types prohibited under section 1 of the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991, were kept for their aggressiveness. |
| There is a cheap and simple way of reducing the number of attacks. The home secretary has a power under section 2 of the act, which has never been used, to impose controls on dogs not prohibited under section 1 but which present a serious danger to the public. This includes the power to require such dogs to be muzzled when in a public place. Muzzling is largely self-policing, like wearing seatbelts, because a breach of the law would be readily seen. Having the dog on a lead is not enough, for the dog may escape. | There is a cheap and simple way of reducing the number of attacks. The home secretary has a power under section 2 of the act, which has never been used, to impose controls on dogs not prohibited under section 1 but which present a serious danger to the public. This includes the power to require such dogs to be muzzled when in a public place. Muzzling is largely self-policing, like wearing seatbelts, because a breach of the law would be readily seen. Having the dog on a lead is not enough, for the dog may escape. |
| It should be applied to the types of dogs involved in the most serious cases: Staffordshire bull terriers, rottweilers, German shepherds. Such a restriction would make these dogs less attractive as trophy dogs. All that is needed is action by the home secretary. David Tucker Thirsk, North Yorkshire | It should be applied to the types of dogs involved in the most serious cases: Staffordshire bull terriers, rottweilers, German shepherds. Such a restriction would make these dogs less attractive as trophy dogs. All that is needed is action by the home secretary. David Tucker Thirsk, North Yorkshire |
| • There is a very simple solution to this problem: the reintroduction of the dog licence at a rate of £100 per year coupled with chipping. Exemptions to be made only for OAPs. Any dog found without a chip or untaxed and any dog that attacks a human being is to be immediately seized and humanely destroyed the same day. Since they are not human any question of human rights violation is irrelevant. Edward Lewis Keele, Staffordshire | • There is a very simple solution to this problem: the reintroduction of the dog licence at a rate of £100 per year coupled with chipping. Exemptions to be made only for OAPs. Any dog found without a chip or untaxed and any dog that attacks a human being is to be immediately seized and humanely destroyed the same day. Since they are not human any question of human rights violation is irrelevant. Edward Lewis Keele, Staffordshire |
| • Ron Stringer (Letters, 15 August) suggests that muzzling dogs in public places would reduce the number of attacks. Given that it is normally status dogs that are involved, perhaps the required fitting of a sparkly pink harness and matching tutu would reduce ownership and therefore halt both the attacks and the startling rate of abandonment once the dog becomes too old or too strong to control. Howard Teece Winchester, Hampshire | • Ron Stringer (Letters, 15 August) suggests that muzzling dogs in public places would reduce the number of attacks. Given that it is normally status dogs that are involved, perhaps the required fitting of a sparkly pink harness and matching tutu would reduce ownership and therefore halt both the attacks and the startling rate of abandonment once the dog becomes too old or too strong to control. Howard Teece Winchester, Hampshire |
| • Certain types of dog muzzles are not suitable for dogs to wear in hot weather. Yes, they may stop a dog opening its jaws to bite but they also prevent the dog from panting, which is crucial in hot weather in order for the animal to keep cool. The RSPCA offers advice on the suitability of certain muzzles and the length of time they should be worn. Elaine Hall Chester | • Certain types of dog muzzles are not suitable for dogs to wear in hot weather. Yes, they may stop a dog opening its jaws to bite but they also prevent the dog from panting, which is crucial in hot weather in order for the animal to keep cool. The RSPCA offers advice on the suitability of certain muzzles and the length of time they should be worn. Elaine Hall Chester |
| Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning. | |
| Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning. Enter your email address to subscribe. |