This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk/6663053.stm

The article has changed 15 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 6 Version 7
Prince Harry not to serve in Iraq Prince Harry not to serve in Iraq
(about 1 hour later)
Prince Harry will not be sent to Iraq, the head of the British Army has said.Prince Harry will not be sent to Iraq, the head of the British Army has said.
The prince had previously stated that he wanted to be involved in active service with his unit. General Sir Richard Dannatt said the prince's deployment would pose an "unacceptable" threat to him and the men who served alongside him.
But the Chief of the General Staff, General Sir Richard Dannatt, has confirmed the Prince will not go with his regiment, the Blues and Royals. It had been reported that militant groups had planned to kill or kidnap the young royal.
The prince is "very disappointed" at the decision but will not be leaving the Army as a result, Clarence House said in a statement. Clarence House said Prince Harry was "very disappointed" but will not be leaving the Army as a result.
'Extremely disappointed''Extremely disappointed'
BBC defence correspondent Paul Adams said the MoD would have taken account of reports the insurgents in Iraq planned to target the prince. The move represents a U-turn by the MoD, which said as recently as last month that the prince would be heading to Iraq as an armed reconnaissance officer in the Blues and Royals regiment.
I know Prince Harry will be extremely disappointed General Sir Richard Dannatt class="" href="/1/hi/uk/6663347.stm">Army statement in full The general said he had reached his decision following a visit to the region at the end of last week.
It has been reported that they had planned to kill or kidnap the prince, and also that his photograph had been widely circulated among insurgents. I know Prince Harry will be extremely disappointed General Sir Richard Dannatt class="" href="/1/hi/uk/6663347.stm">Army statement in full "There have been a number of specific threats, some reported some not reported, which relate directly to Prince Harry as an individual.
The move represents a U-turn by the MoD, which said as recently as last month that the prince would be heading to Iraq as an armed reconnaissance officer. "These threats expose not only him but also those around him to a degree of risk that I now deem unacceptable."
In a statement, the general said: "Following a visit to Iraq last week I discovered a number of threats relating directly to Prince Harry and those around him and I am not prepared to export those risks. General Dannatt said he knew Prince Harry would be extremely disappointed and that his soldiers would miss his presence in Iraq.
"I know Prince Harry will be extremely disappointed and his soldiers will miss his presence in Iraq.
Harry would have been deployed with his regiment to BasraHarry would have been deployed with his regiment to Basra
"I've asked his commanding officer to develop his future career but I won't speculate on that. He said had proved himself as an officer of "determination and undoubted talent - and I do not say that lightly".
"One of the contributing factors to my decision has been the knowledge and discussion of the prince's deployments in the media." The Army chief did not rule out deploying Prince Harry to the region in the future and paid tribute to all British service personnel deployed around the world.
He added that some of the risks faced by Prince Harry had not been reported. But Reg Keys - whose son Thomas was killed while on active service in Basra in 2003 - said he found the decision distasteful and questioned whether insurgents could have told the prince apart from other service personnel.
But he paid tribute to the prince, who he said had proved himself as an officer of "determination and undoubted talent - and I do not say that lightly". Mr Keys added: "It would appear that Harry's life is more valuable than my son or the other nearly 150 service personnel who've given their lives."
And he said he did not rule out deploying him to the region in the future.
'Extreme reluctance''Extreme reluctance'
A Clarence House statement said: "Prince Harry is very disappointed that he will not be able to go to Iraq with his troop on this deployment as he had hoped.A Clarence House statement said: "Prince Harry is very disappointed that he will not be able to go to Iraq with his troop on this deployment as he had hoped.
"He fully understands and accepts General Dannatt's difficult decision and remains committed to his Army career."He fully understands and accepts General Dannatt's difficult decision and remains committed to his Army career.
"Prince Harry's thoughts are with his troop and the rest of the battle group in Iraq.""Prince Harry's thoughts are with his troop and the rest of the battle group in Iraq."
Asked if Harry would quit the Army as a result, a spokesman replied: "Absolutely not."Asked if Harry would quit the Army as a result, a spokesman replied: "Absolutely not."
The former British Army commander, Colonel Bob Stewart, told BBC News 24 the decision would have been taken very reluctantly.The former British Army commander, Colonel Bob Stewart, told BBC News 24 the decision would have been taken very reluctantly.
HAVE YOUR SAY Disappointing for him personally, but the right move by the MoD Bob, Chester Send us your commentsHAVE YOUR SAY Disappointing for him personally, but the right move by the MoD Bob, Chester Send us your comments
He said: "The Chief of the General Staff has actually made such a decision with extreme reluctance; I know that, he's a personal friend and I know exactly the way he's feeling."He said: "The Chief of the General Staff has actually made such a decision with extreme reluctance; I know that, he's a personal friend and I know exactly the way he's feeling."
Harry would have been the first British royal to see action since his uncle, Prince Andrew, served as a helicopter pilot during the Falklands conflict in 1982.Harry would have been the first British royal to see action since his uncle, Prince Andrew, served as a helicopter pilot during the Falklands conflict in 1982.
But Reg Keys - whose son Thomas was killed while on active service in Basra in 2003 - said he found the decision distasteful and questioned whether insurgents could have told the prince apart from other service personnel.
Mr Keys added: "It would appear that Harry's life is more valuable than my son or the other nearly 150 service personnel who've given their lives."
A Downing Street spokesman said: "It's an operational decision taken by the military which we of course respect."A Downing Street spokesman said: "It's an operational decision taken by the military which we of course respect."
But former Conservative Defence Secretary Michael Portillo criticised the MoD for "terrible vacillation" over the issue, and Tory MP Desmond Swayne - a former Territorial Army officer in Iraq - said the decision was a victory for Iraqi insurgents.But former Conservative Defence Secretary Michael Portillo criticised the MoD for "terrible vacillation" over the issue, and Tory MP Desmond Swayne - a former Territorial Army officer in Iraq - said the decision was a victory for Iraqi insurgents.