This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/england/london/6620003.stm
The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 2 | Version 3 |
---|---|
Gypsies lose Olympic site battle | Gypsies lose Olympic site battle |
(about 2 hours later) | |
Gypsy families have lost a High Court battle over plans to make them move to make way for the Olympic village. | Gypsy families have lost a High Court battle over plans to make them move to make way for the Olympic village. |
They have been living on sites in Clays Lane, Newham, and Waterden Crescent, Hackney, both east London, in an area earmarked for Olympic Games projects. | They have been living on sites in Clays Lane, Newham, and Waterden Crescent, Hackney, both east London, in an area earmarked for Olympic Games projects. |
A judge rejected their claims that their human rights would be unlawfully breached if they were forced to transfer to new caravan plots. | A judge rejected their claims that their human rights would be unlawfully breached if they were forced to transfer to new caravan plots. |
The challenge was led by three mothers facing eviction from the sites. | The challenge was led by three mothers facing eviction from the sites. |
'Justified and proportionate' | 'Justified and proportionate' |
Lisa Smith, Mary Reilly and Julia Reilly said the relocation was an unlawful interference with their right to private and family life, under the European Convention on Human Rights. | Lisa Smith, Mary Reilly and Julia Reilly said the relocation was an unlawful interference with their right to private and family life, under the European Convention on Human Rights. |
All three challenged the government's decision in December to confirm the London Development Agency's compulsory purchase order for the land on which the caravan sites stand. | All three challenged the government's decision in December to confirm the London Development Agency's compulsory purchase order for the land on which the caravan sites stand. |
Mr Justice Wyn Williams said: "When a decision maker admits that his decision involves a very significant interference with the human rights of a group of people, the court has a duty to analyse rigorously the basis upon which that decision is said to be justified and proportionate. | Mr Justice Wyn Williams said: "When a decision maker admits that his decision involves a very significant interference with the human rights of a group of people, the court has a duty to analyse rigorously the basis upon which that decision is said to be justified and proportionate. |
"Having subjected the decision to such rigorous assessment, I have reached the clear conclusion that the (Secretary of State for Trade and Industry's) decision to confirm this compulsory purchase order is justified." | "Having subjected the decision to such rigorous assessment, I have reached the clear conclusion that the (Secretary of State for Trade and Industry's) decision to confirm this compulsory purchase order is justified." |
'New sites' | |
The judge ruled that - given the benefits of the Olympics - the compulsory purchase order was a "proportionate" interference with travellers' human rights. | |
A London Development Agency spokesman said it had secured planning permission for new sites for the travellers in Newham and Hackney. | A London Development Agency spokesman said it had secured planning permission for new sites for the travellers in Newham and Hackney. |
"These will provide new sites with modern amenities for all the travellers living on the Olympic park site," he said. | "These will provide new sites with modern amenities for all the travellers living on the Olympic park site," he said. |
"We have worked hard with the travellers to understand their needs and preferences in order to properly reflect their traditional way of life." | "We have worked hard with the travellers to understand their needs and preferences in order to properly reflect their traditional way of life." |
Mrs Giles, 35, the mother of a 12-year-old son and 18-month-old daughter, said: "It is outrageous that we are being forced to move in this way for the Olympics. Members of the wider local community would not be treated in this way." | |
The 35 traveller families affected by the decision are not expected to appeal against the judge's ruling. |