This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk/6534315.stm

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Court hearing for 7 July suspects Court hearing for 7 July suspects
(30 minutes later)
Three men charged in connection with the 7 July 2005 bombings in London have been remanded in custody.Three men charged in connection with the 7 July 2005 bombings in London have been remanded in custody.
Mohammed Shakil, 30, Sadeer Saleem, 26, and Waheed Ali, 23, were accused of conspiracy to cause explosions likely to endanger life.Mohammed Shakil, 30, Sadeer Saleem, 26, and Waheed Ali, 23, were accused of conspiracy to cause explosions likely to endanger life.
The three men - who are the first to be charged in connection with the bombings - appeared before Westminster Magistrates Court.The three men - who are the first to be charged in connection with the bombings - appeared before Westminster Magistrates Court.
Fifty-two people were killed in the suicide attacks on the Tube and a bus.Fifty-two people were killed in the suicide attacks on the Tube and a bus.
SuburbSuburb
The men are alleged to have conspired with the four bombers who detonated their devices on the morning of 7 July - Mohammed Siddique Khan, Shezhad Tanweer, Jermaine Lindsay and Hasib Hussein.
The three who appeared in court are all from Beeston, the same Leeds suburb with which the bombers had connections.The three who appeared in court are all from Beeston, the same Leeds suburb with which the bombers had connections.
However Waheed Ali, who until recently was known as Shipon Ullah, has been living in London. The men are alleged to have conspired with the four bombers who detonated their devices on the morning of 7 July - Mohammed Siddique Khan, Shezhad Tanweer, Jermaine Lindsay and Hasib Hussein.
The alleged targets of the conspiracy were the Transport for London system "and/or tourist attractions in London". No particular attractions were specified in the details of the charge.
The court hearing started at 1100 BST, and lasted around an hour.The court hearing started at 1100 BST, and lasted around an hour.
The three defendants today spoke only to confirm their names and dates of birth.
Mr Saleem was the only defendant who applied for bail, but it was refused.Mr Saleem was the only defendant who applied for bail, but it was refused.
The case has been referred to the Central Criminal Court and a preliminary hearing will be held on 20 April. Senior District Judge Timothy Workman remanded all three men in custody to appear for a preliminary hearing at The Old Bailey on 20 April.
The judge said it was likely to be done by video link.The judge said it was likely to be done by video link.
AllegationsAllegations
The three men were arrested by police on 22 March. Mr Shakil, Mr Saleem, and Mr Ali, were arrested by police on 22 March.
Two of them were arrested at Manchester Airport when they were due to catch a flight to Pakistan, while the third was detained at a house in Leeds.Two of them were arrested at Manchester Airport when they were due to catch a flight to Pakistan, while the third was detained at a house in Leeds.
The charge against them alleges that between 1 November 2004 and 29 June 2005, they "unlawfully and maliciously" conspired with the four 7/7 bombers - Khan, Tanweer, Lindsay and Hussein - to cause "by explosive substance, explosions on the Transport for London system and/or tourist attractions in London of a nature likely to endanger life or cause serious injury to property". The charge against them alleges that between 1 November 2004 and 29 June 2005, they "unlawfully and maliciously" conspired with the four 7/7 bombers to cause "by explosive substance, explosions on the Transport for London system and/or tourist attractions in London of a nature likely to endanger life or cause serious injury to property".
The alleged offence is contrary to Section 3(1) (a) of the Explosive Substances Act 1883.The alleged offence is contrary to Section 3(1) (a) of the Explosive Substances Act 1883.