This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk_politics/6495191.stm

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Kelly's Mirror complaint rejected Kelly's Mirror complaint rejected
(about 3 hours later)
Cabinet minister Ruth Kelly has lost her complaint against the Daily Mirror, over its coverage of her decision to educate her son privately. Cabinet minister Ruth Kelly has lost her complaint against the Daily Mirror over its coverage of her decision to educate her son privately.
The Press Complaints Commission (PCC) rejected her complaint that the story had breached her son's privacy.The Press Complaints Commission (PCC) rejected her complaint that the story had breached her son's privacy.
The former education secretary decided to send him to a private school because of his learning difficulties.The former education secretary decided to send him to a private school because of his learning difficulties.
The PCC said the Mirror had correctly balanced the public's right to know with the child's right to privacy.The PCC said the Mirror had correctly balanced the public's right to know with the child's right to privacy.
In its ruling, the PCC said the issues raised in the article were "a matter of considerable public interest".In its ruling, the PCC said the issues raised in the article were "a matter of considerable public interest".
The fact that the complainant did not feel that the current state system could meet her child's requirements raised questions about the nature of publicly-funded schooling PCC ruling The fact that the complainant did not feel that the current state system could meet her child's requirements raised questions about the nature of publicly funded schooling PCC ruling
"The fact that a Cabinet minister - who had previously been Secretary of State for Education and Skills - had elected to remove her child from the state system to be enrolled in a private school raised important issues for public debate," it said."The fact that a Cabinet minister - who had previously been Secretary of State for Education and Skills - had elected to remove her child from the state system to be enrolled in a private school raised important issues for public debate," it said.
"Even if government policy included an acceptance of private schooling for those with special needs, the fact that the complainant did not feel that the current state system could meet her child's requirements raised questions about the nature of publicly-funded schooling and its ability to cater for children with special needs - including those whose families would not be able to pay for private schooling." "Even if government policy included an acceptance of private schooling for those with special needs, the fact that the complainant did not feel that the current state system could meet her child's requirements raised questions about the nature of publicly funded schooling and its ability to cater for children with special needs - including those whose families would not be able to pay for private schooling."
A spokeswoman for Ms Kelly said she was very disappointed with the decision and she believed the PCC should have granted the same right of privacy to her child, that it does to others.
'The right thing''The right thing'
In a statement, Ms Kelly said she was "very disappointed" with the ruling and that her only intention had been to protect her son.
"I have always accepted the scrutiny, both personal and political, which comes with being a politician and minister," she said.
"But this case was not about me but about a nine-year-old child. I brought the complaint because I do not see why the protection that the code rightly gives to children in general should not extend to the children of politicians."
The story - that a Cabinet minister had sent their child to a private school - was first reported, without names, in the Mail on Sunday.The story - that a Cabinet minister had sent their child to a private school - was first reported, without names, in the Mail on Sunday.
Ms Kelly, now the Communities Secretary, was named in the Mirror's story the next day, although her child was not.Ms Kelly, now the Communities Secretary, was named in the Mirror's story the next day, although her child was not.
She subsequently said she had removed her son from a state school after advice recommended he be placed in a school "able to meet his particular needs".She subsequently said she had removed her son from a state school after advice recommended he be placed in a school "able to meet his particular needs".
She said: "I, like any mother, want to do the right thing for my son." She added: "I, like any mother, want to do the right thing for my son."
She added: "I appreciate that some will disagree with my decision. I understand why, but we all face difficult choices as parents." Her three other children are educated at state schools. Her son will remain at the £15,000-a-year private school, but she said he would start at a state secondary school after a "couple of years".
Her three other children are educated at state schools, and she said it had been her intention for her son to do so. He would remain at the £15,000-a-year private school for "a couple of years before he begins at a state secondary school", she said.
The issue of private education has long been controversial within the Labour Party.The issue of private education has long been controversial within the Labour Party.
Mirror editor Richard Wallace argued that it was "right and proper" to identify her, as her actions "were clearly at odds with government policy".Mirror editor Richard Wallace argued that it was "right and proper" to identify her, as her actions "were clearly at odds with government policy".