This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk_politics/6415007.stm
The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
Sir Menzies wins vote on Trident | Sir Menzies wins vote on Trident |
(10 minutes later) | |
Lib Dem leader Sir Menzies Campbell has seen off a grassroots challenge to his policy of delaying a decision on replacing Trident nuclear weapons. | Lib Dem leader Sir Menzies Campbell has seen off a grassroots challenge to his policy of delaying a decision on replacing Trident nuclear weapons. |
He won a vote at the party's spring conference by the narrowest of margins after making a personal appeal to activists in an impassioned speech. | He won a vote at the party's spring conference by the narrowest of margins after making a personal appeal to activists in an impassioned speech. |
Opponents wanted Trident to be scrapped when it reaches the end of its life. | |
However, Sir Menzies wants the number of warheads to be halved now but a decision on replacing them delayed. | However, Sir Menzies wants the number of warheads to be halved now but a decision on replacing them delayed. |
Sir Menzies won the vote by 454 votes to 414, after an initial show of hands had been too close to call. | |
The result will come as a boost to Sir Menzies, with party managers saying afterwards that opponents of the party line would probably have won without his intervention. | |
Sir Menzies, who had not been due to speak in the debate, said Lib Dem MPs would be voting against government plans to renew Trident whatever happened. | |
"I only know one way to lead and that is from the front," he told delegates. | |
Status quo | |
But, far from backing nuclear weapons, his proposals were about disarmament and "about cutting Trident by half now". | |
The rebel amendment, on the other hand, would see Britain keeping Trident until it reached the end of its useful life, before scrapping it. | |
"What on earth is radical about preserving the status quo?" he asked delegates. | |
He said government plans to renew Trident, at a cost of £65bn, were part of a "desperate attempt" by Tony Blair to "shore up his own legacy". | |
And he said Liberal Democrats would not "fall into Blair's trap under any circumstances". | |
Revolt | |
But Sir Menzies said cancelling the replacement for Trident now would do nothing to help the cause of disarmament. | |
His proposals were a "rational and perceptive response" to the situation, which would give Britain influence in disarmament talks. | |
Sir Menzies was backed by frontbench colleagues Simon Hughes and defence spokesman Nick Harvey, who both spoke in favour of his proposals. | |
The revolt against the official party line was led by senior MP and former frontbench spokesman Phil Willis. | |
He said the "wait and see" approach would discredit the party, encourage proliferation and tie the UK into US foreign policy. | |
'No turning back' | |
And he attacked as "pure misrepresentation", the leadership's claims that the amendment would result in Britain keeping Trident for 20 years. | |
"What are we waiting for?" he asked activists. "Blair is making the decision not in four years' time or five years' time; he is making the decision this month. | |
"And once this multi-million pound programme is embarked on there will be no turning back. | |
"Postponing a decision sends out a clear signal, that our party is prepared to support new improved weapons of mass destruction some time in the future. Is that what this conference wants? | |
"If the Liberal Democrats are to be relevant, we must be prepared to be different. | |
"Waiting will not make nuclear weapons less dangerous, nor will it make them more ethical. | |
"Waiting will not kick start disarmament, it will encourage proliferation. | |
"Waiting well not help influence rogue states to give up their nuclear ambitions; why should they respond to a policy of 'do as I say not as I do?' |