This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk_politics/6406473.stm

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Funding threatens future defence Funds 'threaten future defence'
(about 10 hours later)
Britain's future defence capabilities could suffer if investment in defence research is not increased, the Commons defence committee has said.Britain's future defence capabilities could suffer if investment in defence research is not increased, the Commons defence committee has said.
It said that although operations in Iraq and Afghanistan took priority, it urged the Ministry of Defence not to cut long-term research funding.It said that although operations in Iraq and Afghanistan took priority, it urged the Ministry of Defence not to cut long-term research funding.
It also said "that the gap between the UK and the US in defence research spending is widening".It also said "that the gap between the UK and the US in defence research spending is widening".
The UK could also fall behind other countries' spending, it warned.The UK could also fall behind other countries' spending, it warned.
The committee was examining the work of the Defence Science and Technology Laboratory, as well as funding of defence research.The committee was examining the work of the Defence Science and Technology Laboratory, as well as funding of defence research.
In its report it described the laboratory as being "regarded as a world authority in many fields of defence research." In its report it described the laboratory as being "regarded as a world authority in many fields of defence research".
Committee chairman James Arbuthnot said: "The government's own analysis has shown that military advantage depends on the research and development investment made over the previous 25 years.Committee chairman James Arbuthnot said: "The government's own analysis has shown that military advantage depends on the research and development investment made over the previous 25 years.
The government cannot just rely on industry to fund research, but must itself invest for the future James ArbuthnotDefence committeeThe government cannot just rely on industry to fund research, but must itself invest for the future James ArbuthnotDefence committee
"The UK's defence research is currently amongst the best in the world, but this is at risk."The UK's defence research is currently amongst the best in the world, but this is at risk.
"If the UK continues to fall behind other countries in defence research spending, our armed forces will lose their capability advantage and fighting edge.""If the UK continues to fall behind other countries in defence research spending, our armed forces will lose their capability advantage and fighting edge."
The government spends £2.64bn a year on defence research - about 10% of the US budget of £23bn.The government spends £2.64bn a year on defence research - about 10% of the US budget of £23bn.
The UK research spending is 9% of the total defence budget or 0.18% of GDP, while the US equivalent is 16% of its defence budget and 0.46% of GDP.The UK research spending is 9% of the total defence budget or 0.18% of GDP, while the US equivalent is 16% of its defence budget and 0.46% of GDP.
Mr Arbuthnot said: "The government cannot just rely on industry to fund research, but must itself invest for the future." He said the chancellor's comprehensive funding review should include more funds for research.Mr Arbuthnot said: "The government cannot just rely on industry to fund research, but must itself invest for the future." He said the chancellor's comprehensive funding review should include more funds for research.
The lab provides independent scientific and technological services to the MoD, the Armed Forces and government "in those areas inappropriate for the private sector".The lab provides independent scientific and technological services to the MoD, the Armed Forces and government "in those areas inappropriate for the private sector".