This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk/6386891.stm

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Control order powers win renewal Control order powers win renewal
(20 minutes later)
Powers to impose control orders on terrorist suspects have been renewed for another year in the Commons.Powers to impose control orders on terrorist suspects have been renewed for another year in the Commons.
The orders, giving ministers the ability to put individuals under close supervision, came into force in 2005.The orders, giving ministers the ability to put individuals under close supervision, came into force in 2005.
The introduction came after Law Lords ruled holding suspects in jail without charge breached human rights but critics question the effectiveness.The introduction came after Law Lords ruled holding suspects in jail without charge breached human rights but critics question the effectiveness.
Conservatives voted with the government "with reluctance" and the Liberal Democrats opposed the renewal.Conservatives voted with the government "with reluctance" and the Liberal Democrats opposed the renewal.
The Commons voting was 322 to 61. Peers will now debate the annual renewal.The Commons voting was 322 to 61. Peers will now debate the annual renewal.
There are currently 18 terror suspects on control orders. The independent reviewer of the system recently concluded control orders should be used as a "last resort" but were a "justifiable and proportional safety valve" for the protection of society.
Since the summer three cases of suspects absconding have come to notice. Tory warning
There are currently 18 terror suspects on control orders but since the summer three cases of absconding have come to notice.
In a Commons debate before the vote, security minister Tony McNulty acknowledged control orders could not be "100% effective" but said the measures had been weakened by legal challenges.
But he said: "Without control orders these individuals would be free to continue to engage in terrorist-related activity".
Shadow homeland security minister Patrick Mercer described the system as a "shambles".
"We have got to bring this system to an end. We've got to end this injustice and we've got to take dangerous and subversive people off our streets," he said.
The power to impose such an order should reside with the court, not the home secretary Nick Clegg, Lib Dem home affairs spokesman
"This system does not allow that to happen."
He pledged support but said: "We will not be able to sustain this position, this time next year."
Liberal Democrats home affairs spokesman Nick Clegg said control orders were "imperfect and in need of extensive revision".
"The power to impose such an order should reside with the court, not the home secretary," he said.
"They should be strictly time limited and subject to regular and thorough reviews."
Labour MP and former home office minister Fiona MacTaggart suggested the UK risked bringing itself into "international disrepute" over control orders.