This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk/6381969.stm

The article has changed 8 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Police review criminal DNA cases Police review criminal DNA cases
(about 1 hour later)
Police forces in England and Wales are to review criminal cases in which DNA samples may have been missed by the Forensic Science Service. Hundreds of criminal cases are to be reviewed because vital DNA samples may have been missed by the Forensic Science Service.
The Association of Chief Police Officers has written to 43 chief constables about serious cases such as murder which may need re-investigating. The Association of Chief Police Officers has written to 43 chief constables about cases which may need to be re-investigated.
An unspecified number of cases dated between 2000 and 2005 will be reviewed. Those under review fall within a five-year period between 2000 and 2005.
Shadow home secretary David Davis expressed concern and described the situation as "incredibly serious".Shadow home secretary David Davis expressed concern and described the situation as "incredibly serious".
A Home Office spokesperson said "a minimal amount" of cases were involved and that the situation would not have led to anyone being wrongly convicted.A Home Office spokesperson said "a minimal amount" of cases were involved and that the situation would not have led to anyone being wrongly convicted.
'Small percentage''Small percentage'
Instead the cases involved situations where there was "no result" in DNA tests, which would have meant that potentially a guilty person was not convicted.Instead the cases involved situations where there was "no result" in DNA tests, which would have meant that potentially a guilty person was not convicted.
The cases would specifically involve Low Copy Number (LCN) DNA samples which involve tiny traces of DNA that have only been detectable with new techniques available since 2001.The cases would specifically involve Low Copy Number (LCN) DNA samples which involve tiny traces of DNA that have only been detectable with new techniques available since 2001.
The review relates to cases where the FSS analysed tiny samples of blood or saliva for a DNA profile, only to get a negative result when detectives had expected otherwise.
DNA evidence became traceable in very small traces of bodily fluids from 2000 following advances in testing techniques.
The FSS was apparently applying the new LCN technique in a different way, meaning its scientists may have missed DNA evidence that other private forensic laboratories could have identified.
ACPO is now waiting to hear from police forces in England and Wales about any cases which may need revisiting - a spokesman said it expected a "prompt response".
A joint statement issued by the Home Office and Acpo said: "Towards the end of 2006 we become aware that a small percentage of DNA samples may need to be re-examined as a result of differences in the way forensic suppliers were using new techniques to analyse forensic material between 2000 and 2005.A joint statement issued by the Home Office and Acpo said: "Towards the end of 2006 we become aware that a small percentage of DNA samples may need to be re-examined as a result of differences in the way forensic suppliers were using new techniques to analyse forensic material between 2000 and 2005.
"Acpo is very close to completing that work and has found no evidence that we should be concerned about standards being used today. "Acpo is very close to completing that work and has found no evidence that we should be concerned about standards being used today."
'Silver bullet''Silver bullet'
"We cannot speculate on the numbers involved until the full review is complete."
Shadow home secretary David Davis expressed concerns over a potential "fundamental failure".Shadow home secretary David Davis expressed concerns over a potential "fundamental failure".
He told BBC News 24: "DNA evidence is almost viewed as a silver bullet point by this government.He told BBC News 24: "DNA evidence is almost viewed as a silver bullet point by this government.
"Certainly it's insisting on increasing the DNA database, without the legal backing for it and so on, so it thinks DNA's very important, and rightly so, it is very important."Certainly it's insisting on increasing the DNA database, without the legal backing for it and so on, so it thinks DNA's very important, and rightly so, it is very important.
"Juries tend to believe it almost without argument. Therefore it's very important to keep the quality of that evidence up.""Juries tend to believe it almost without argument. Therefore it's very important to keep the quality of that evidence up."